Enlightenment, Modernization, Professional Training

G. Kurucz
{"title":"Enlightenment, Modernization, Professional Training","authors":"G. Kurucz","doi":"10.47074/hsce.2022-1.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Western historical narratives of the Enlightenment tend to depict the eighteenth-centuryaristocracy as a unique promoter of overall progress, whereas Hungarian historiography is moreinclined to appraise their role according to a deprecating approach based on the criticism of atraditional class system. However, it seems clear that a more balanced judgement of the Hungarianaristocracy should involve a complex analysis. In first place, it is to be decided whether erudite andfinancially well-off individuals existed, and if so, to what extent they were willing and capable ofcontributing to various forms of innovation, let alone social and cultural progress. For this reason, thispaper is designed to focus on the activities of Count György Festetics, a Transdanubian Hungarianaristocrat who was educated in the Theresianum, an elite Viennese training institute, but whosecareer prospects were thwarted at the end of the eighteenth century on account of his involvementwith the anti-Habsburg movement of Hungary’s lesser nobility on the death of Emperor Joseph II.This analysis seems justifiable, because Festetics’s decision to set up a farming college in Keszthelyclearly shows his commitment to progress, aiming at the adaptation of modern methods as wellas creating the institutional background for the dissemination of specialist knowledge among thevarious layers of contemporary society.","PeriodicalId":267555,"journal":{"name":"Historical Studies on Central Europe","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical Studies on Central Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47074/hsce.2022-1.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Western historical narratives of the Enlightenment tend to depict the eighteenth-centuryaristocracy as a unique promoter of overall progress, whereas Hungarian historiography is moreinclined to appraise their role according to a deprecating approach based on the criticism of atraditional class system. However, it seems clear that a more balanced judgement of the Hungarianaristocracy should involve a complex analysis. In first place, it is to be decided whether erudite andfinancially well-off individuals existed, and if so, to what extent they were willing and capable ofcontributing to various forms of innovation, let alone social and cultural progress. For this reason, thispaper is designed to focus on the activities of Count György Festetics, a Transdanubian Hungarianaristocrat who was educated in the Theresianum, an elite Viennese training institute, but whosecareer prospects were thwarted at the end of the eighteenth century on account of his involvementwith the anti-Habsburg movement of Hungary’s lesser nobility on the death of Emperor Joseph II.This analysis seems justifiable, because Festetics’s decision to set up a farming college in Keszthelyclearly shows his commitment to progress, aiming at the adaptation of modern methods as wellas creating the institutional background for the dissemination of specialist knowledge among thevarious layers of contemporary society.
启蒙、现代化、专业化
西方启蒙运动的历史叙事倾向于将18世纪的贵族政治描述为整体进步的独特推动者,而匈牙利的历史编纂则更倾向于根据一种基于对传统阶级制度的批评的贬低方法来评估他们的作用。然而,似乎很明显,对匈牙利贵族更平衡的判断应该包括一个复杂的分析。首先,要决定是否存在博学和经济富裕的个人,如果存在,他们愿意和能够在多大程度上为各种形式的创新做出贡献,更不用说社会和文化进步了。出于这个原因,本文旨在关注György Festetics伯爵的活动,他是一名跨多瑙河的匈牙利贵族,曾在维也纳精英培训机构Theresianum接受教育,但在18世纪末,由于他在皇帝约瑟夫二世去世后参与了匈牙利下层贵族的反哈布斯堡运动,他的职业前景受到了阻碍。这种分析似乎是合理的,因为Festetics决定在keszthelyy建立一所农业学院清楚地表明了他对进步的承诺,旨在适应现代方法,并为在当代社会各阶层之间传播专业知识创造制度背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信