Comparative Study of Access to Oral Health Care for Precarious and Non-precarious Populations in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire

Sangaré Abou Dramane, S. Mamadou, Meless Guanga David, Adou Akpe Jonas, Traore Jules Fabrice, Guinan Jean-Claude, R. Bakayoko-Ly
{"title":"Comparative Study of Access to Oral Health Care for Precarious and Non-precarious Populations in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire","authors":"Sangaré Abou Dramane, S. Mamadou, Meless Guanga David, Adou Akpe Jonas, Traore Jules Fabrice, Guinan Jean-Claude, R. Bakayoko-Ly","doi":"10.11648/J.HEP.20190402.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The situation of insecurity resulting from precariousness raises concerns about the oral health of the victims. The objective of this study was to compare the dental status and the modalities of the use of oral care of people in precarious situations to those of non-precarious. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 256 users of the dental office of the University Hospital of Treichville, in precarious situation or not. Subjects in precarious situations were identified using a tracking tool to take into account the context of the intervention. The respondents were interviewed using a standardized questionnaire. The data collected made it possible to calculate percentages and comparisons of the modalities of oral health care use between \"precarious\" and \"not precarious\" using the Chi2 test. Subjects in precarious situations had more recourse to self-medication (84.6%) at first intention than subjects who were not precarious (p=0,011). Renunciation of oral health care was more common in the \"precarious\" group than in the \"non- precarious\" group (p=0,004). The number of missing teeth among people in precarious situations was twice as high as among \"not precarious\" subjects. On the other hand, the number of filled teeth (O) was 3 times higher in \"not precarious\" subjects than in \"precarious\" subjects. The results of this study show the need for awareness raising and the implementation of a social protection system guaranteeing greater accessibility to care for people in precarious situations and even for the population as a whole.","PeriodicalId":213187,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Economics and Policy","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Economics and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.HEP.20190402.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The situation of insecurity resulting from precariousness raises concerns about the oral health of the victims. The objective of this study was to compare the dental status and the modalities of the use of oral care of people in precarious situations to those of non-precarious. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 256 users of the dental office of the University Hospital of Treichville, in precarious situation or not. Subjects in precarious situations were identified using a tracking tool to take into account the context of the intervention. The respondents were interviewed using a standardized questionnaire. The data collected made it possible to calculate percentages and comparisons of the modalities of oral health care use between "precarious" and "not precarious" using the Chi2 test. Subjects in precarious situations had more recourse to self-medication (84.6%) at first intention than subjects who were not precarious (p=0,011). Renunciation of oral health care was more common in the "precarious" group than in the "non- precarious" group (p=0,004). The number of missing teeth among people in precarious situations was twice as high as among "not precarious" subjects. On the other hand, the number of filled teeth (O) was 3 times higher in "not precarious" subjects than in "precarious" subjects. The results of this study show the need for awareness raising and the implementation of a social protection system guaranteeing greater accessibility to care for people in precarious situations and even for the population as a whole.
阿比让危险人口和非危险人口获得口腔保健的比较研究Côte科特迪瓦
不稳定造成的不安全状况引起人们对受害者口腔健康的关切。本研究的目的是比较牙齿状况和使用口腔护理的人在不稳定的情况下,那些不稳定的模式。对特莱希维尔大学医院牙科诊所的256名患者进行了横断面调查,这些患者是否处于危险状态。在不稳定的情况下,使用跟踪工具识别受试者,以考虑干预的背景。受访者使用标准化问卷进行访谈。收集到的数据使得使用Chi2测试计算“不稳定”和“不稳定”之间的口腔保健使用方式的百分比和比较成为可能。处于不稳定状态的受试者比非不稳定状态的受试者更倾向于自我药疗(84.6%)(p= 0.011)。放弃口腔保健在“不稳定”组中比在“不稳定”组中更常见(p= 0.004)。处于不稳定状态的人缺牙的数量是处于不稳定状态的人的两倍。另一方面,“不稳定”组的补牙数(0)是“不稳定”组的3倍。这项研究的结果表明,有必要提高认识并实施一项社会保护制度,以保证处于不稳定状况的人甚至整个人口更容易获得照顾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信