Assessing Large-Scale Power Relations among Locations from Mobility Data

L. S. Oliveira, P. V. D. Melo, A. C. Viana
{"title":"Assessing Large-Scale Power Relations among Locations from Mobility Data","authors":"L. S. Oliveira, P. V. D. Melo, A. C. Viana","doi":"10.1145/3470770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The pervasiveness of smartphones has shaped our lives, social norms, and the structure that dictates human behavior. They now directly influence how individuals demand resources or interact with network services. From this scenario, identifying key locations in cities is fundamental for the investigation of human mobility and also for the understanding of social problems. In this context, we propose the first graph-based methodology in the literature to quantify the power of Point-of-Interests (POIs) over its vicinity by means of user mobility trajectories. Different from literature, we consider the flow of people in our analysis, instead of the number of neighbor POIs or their structural locations in the city. Thus, we modeled POI’s visits using the multiflow graph model where each POI is a node and the transitions of users among POIs are a weighted direct edge. Using this multiflow graph model, we compute the attract, support, and independence powers. The attract power and support power measure how many visits a POI gathers from and disseminate over its neighborhood, respectively. Moreover, the independence power captures the capacity of a POI to receive visitors independently from other POIs. We tested our methodology on well-known university campus mobility datasets and validated on Location-Based Social Networks (LBSNs) datasets from various cities around the world. Our findings show that in university campus: (i) buildings have low support power and attract power; (ii) people tend to move over a few buildings and spend most of their time in the same building; and (iii) there is a slight dependence among buildings, even those with high independence power receive user visits from other buildings on campus. Globally, we reveal that (i) our metrics capture places that impact the number of visits in their neighborhood; (ii) cities in the same continent have similar independence patterns; and (iii) places with a high number of visitation and city central areas are the regions with the highest degree of independence.","PeriodicalId":435653,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3470770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The pervasiveness of smartphones has shaped our lives, social norms, and the structure that dictates human behavior. They now directly influence how individuals demand resources or interact with network services. From this scenario, identifying key locations in cities is fundamental for the investigation of human mobility and also for the understanding of social problems. In this context, we propose the first graph-based methodology in the literature to quantify the power of Point-of-Interests (POIs) over its vicinity by means of user mobility trajectories. Different from literature, we consider the flow of people in our analysis, instead of the number of neighbor POIs or their structural locations in the city. Thus, we modeled POI’s visits using the multiflow graph model where each POI is a node and the transitions of users among POIs are a weighted direct edge. Using this multiflow graph model, we compute the attract, support, and independence powers. The attract power and support power measure how many visits a POI gathers from and disseminate over its neighborhood, respectively. Moreover, the independence power captures the capacity of a POI to receive visitors independently from other POIs. We tested our methodology on well-known university campus mobility datasets and validated on Location-Based Social Networks (LBSNs) datasets from various cities around the world. Our findings show that in university campus: (i) buildings have low support power and attract power; (ii) people tend to move over a few buildings and spend most of their time in the same building; and (iii) there is a slight dependence among buildings, even those with high independence power receive user visits from other buildings on campus. Globally, we reveal that (i) our metrics capture places that impact the number of visits in their neighborhood; (ii) cities in the same continent have similar independence patterns; and (iii) places with a high number of visitation and city central areas are the regions with the highest degree of independence.
从移动数据评估地点间大规模权力关系
智能手机的普及塑造了我们的生活、社会规范和支配人类行为的结构。它们现在直接影响个人对资源的需求或与网络服务的交互方式。在这种情况下,确定城市中的关键位置是研究人类流动性和理解社会问题的基础。在此背景下,我们提出了文献中第一个基于图形的方法,通过用户移动轨迹来量化兴趣点(poi)在其附近的力量。与文献不同的是,我们在分析中考虑的是人流,而不是相邻poi的数量或它们在城市中的结构位置。因此,我们使用多流图模型对POI的访问进行建模,其中每个POI是一个节点,用户在POI之间的转换是一个加权的直接边。利用这个多流图模型,我们计算了吸引力、支持力和独立性。吸引力和支持力分别衡量POI从其邻居聚集和传播的访问量。此外,独立性能力捕获POI独立于其他POI接收访问者的能力。我们在知名大学校园流动性数据集上测试了我们的方法,并在来自世界各地不同城市的基于位置的社交网络(LBSNs)数据集上进行了验证。研究结果表明:大学校园建筑的支撑力和吸引力较低;(ii)人们往往会搬离几幢建筑物,大部分时间都在同一幢建筑物内度过;(3)建筑物之间存在轻微的依赖性,即使具有较高独立性的建筑物也会受到校园内其他建筑物的用户访问。在全球范围内,我们发现(i)我们的指标捕获了影响其附近访问数量的地方;同一大陆的城市具有相似的独立模式;(3)游客较多的地方和城市中心区是独立程度最高的区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信