Socio-cultural Considerations in Environmental Policy Formulation and Implementation in Ethiopia

Zerihun Doda Doffana
{"title":"Socio-cultural Considerations in Environmental Policy Formulation and Implementation in Ethiopia","authors":"Zerihun Doda Doffana","doi":"10.56302/jads.v8i2.3261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The idea of policies for holistic social development, healthy communities, and resilient socio-cultural institutions is one of the core issues of literature on sustainable society, development and environment. The nexus between national economic policies, resilient communities, and development is best understood in the context of policies for social development, particularly in terms of building resilient socio-cultural institutions, protecting communities, and ensuring useful traditional knowledge systems. Some research on environment and society in Ethiopia generally focus on policy failures and institutional dysfunctions leading to natural resource degradation and environmental exploitation. Others address increasingly insecure livelihood and political instability as a manifestation of unsuitable society, environment, and development. Further, policy instruments pertaining to environment, and the impact assessments are often analyzed in light of the legal perspective. This study aimed at understanding how existing environmental policy instruments define and represent socio-cultural matters as part of the environment policy and impact assessment frameworks of the country. The study adopted a qualitative method approach through analyzing existing policy documents and interviewing relevant actors. The study found out that while existing instruments do indeed address socio-cultural issues, the main problem lies in adequacy of representation of socio-cultural issues, particularly cultural resources (notably heritages, identities, belief systems social institutions, etc.). More so, the problem lies in the disturbing state of realizing the policy provisions for socio-cultural issues. Policy formulators and implementers’ general level of socio-culturally sensitive awareness, attitude and commitment is a key gap.","PeriodicalId":128999,"journal":{"name":"Journal of African Development Studies","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of African Development Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56302/jads.v8i2.3261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The idea of policies for holistic social development, healthy communities, and resilient socio-cultural institutions is one of the core issues of literature on sustainable society, development and environment. The nexus between national economic policies, resilient communities, and development is best understood in the context of policies for social development, particularly in terms of building resilient socio-cultural institutions, protecting communities, and ensuring useful traditional knowledge systems. Some research on environment and society in Ethiopia generally focus on policy failures and institutional dysfunctions leading to natural resource degradation and environmental exploitation. Others address increasingly insecure livelihood and political instability as a manifestation of unsuitable society, environment, and development. Further, policy instruments pertaining to environment, and the impact assessments are often analyzed in light of the legal perspective. This study aimed at understanding how existing environmental policy instruments define and represent socio-cultural matters as part of the environment policy and impact assessment frameworks of the country. The study adopted a qualitative method approach through analyzing existing policy documents and interviewing relevant actors. The study found out that while existing instruments do indeed address socio-cultural issues, the main problem lies in adequacy of representation of socio-cultural issues, particularly cultural resources (notably heritages, identities, belief systems social institutions, etc.). More so, the problem lies in the disturbing state of realizing the policy provisions for socio-cultural issues. Policy formulators and implementers’ general level of socio-culturally sensitive awareness, attitude and commitment is a key gap.
埃塞俄比亚环境政策制定和实施中的社会文化因素
整体社会发展、健康社区和弹性社会文化机构的政策理念是可持续社会、发展和环境文献的核心问题之一。在社会发展政策的背景下,特别是在建设具有复原力的社会文化机构、保护社区和确保有用的传统知识体系方面,国家经济政策、复原力社区和发展之间的联系得到了最好的理解。一些关于埃塞俄比亚环境和社会的研究一般侧重于导致自然资源退化和环境开发的政策失败和体制失调。另一些则将日益不安全的生计和政治不稳定视为不适宜的社会、环境和发展的表现。此外,与环境有关的政策工具和影响评估往往从法律角度进行分析。这项研究的目的是了解现有的环境政策工具如何界定和反映社会文化问题,作为该国环境政策和影响评估框架的一部分。本研究通过对现有政策文件的分析和对相关行为主体的访谈,采用了定性研究方法。研究发现,虽然现有工具确实解决了社会文化问题,但主要问题在于社会文化问题,特别是文化资源(特别是遗产、身份、信仰体系和社会机构等)的代表性是否充分。更重要的是,问题在于对社会文化问题的政策规定的实现状况令人不安。政策制定者和执行者对社会文化敏感的认识、态度和承诺的一般水平是一个关键的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信