Behind the Scenes: Course Syllabi explained

N. Buswell
{"title":"Behind the Scenes: Course Syllabi explained","authors":"N. Buswell","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2018.8659273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this Full Research Paper, as part of a larger research project that sought to understand the experiences of assistant engineering professors at non-R1 institutions, I examined the teaching conceptions and methods that were described in participants’ course syllabi. The actual course syllabi documents were examined, and additionally, I examined the way the participants themselves described their course syllabi using an interviewing technique called document elicitation. In this paper, I present the findings for two participants who both taught a course on “Dynamic Systems and Controls.” This paper presents an exploratory content analysis of a course syllabus and the accompanying interviews about the course syllabus for two participants. I found that the instructors included a limited amount of information about their teaching conceptions and methods in their actual course syllabi documents. However, I found that the technique of document elicitation about course syllabi was extremely successful in getting a thick description about a participant’s teaching conceptions and methods. These findings point to the beneficial use of teaching syllabi in interviews and conversations about teaching as describing the backstory and decisions behind a course syllabus reveal much about instructors’ teaching conceptions and methods.","PeriodicalId":354904,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2018.8659273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this Full Research Paper, as part of a larger research project that sought to understand the experiences of assistant engineering professors at non-R1 institutions, I examined the teaching conceptions and methods that were described in participants’ course syllabi. The actual course syllabi documents were examined, and additionally, I examined the way the participants themselves described their course syllabi using an interviewing technique called document elicitation. In this paper, I present the findings for two participants who both taught a course on “Dynamic Systems and Controls.” This paper presents an exploratory content analysis of a course syllabus and the accompanying interviews about the course syllabus for two participants. I found that the instructors included a limited amount of information about their teaching conceptions and methods in their actual course syllabi documents. However, I found that the technique of document elicitation about course syllabi was extremely successful in getting a thick description about a participant’s teaching conceptions and methods. These findings point to the beneficial use of teaching syllabi in interviews and conversations about teaching as describing the backstory and decisions behind a course syllabus reveal much about instructors’ teaching conceptions and methods.
幕后:课程大纲说明
在这篇完整的研究论文中,作为一个更大的研究项目的一部分,该研究项目旨在了解非r1机构的助理工程教授的经历,我研究了参与者课程大纲中描述的教学概念和方法。我检查了实际的课程大纲文件,此外,我还检查了参与者自己描述课程大纲的方式,使用了一种被称为文件引出的访谈技术。在本文中,我展示了两位教授“动态系统与控制”课程的参与者的研究结果。本文对课程大纲进行了探索性的内容分析,并对两位参与者进行了课程大纲访谈。我发现教师在实际的课程大纲文件中只包含了有限的关于他们的教学理念和方法的信息。然而,我发现关于课程大纲的文档引出技术在获得参与者的教学理念和方法的详细描述方面非常成功。这些发现表明,在采访和教学对话中使用教学大纲是有益的,因为它描述了课程大纲背后的背景故事和决定,揭示了教师的教学观念和方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信