Investigating the Impact of Personality and Cognitive Efficiency on the Selection of Exercises for Learners

J. Okpo, J. Masthoff, Matt Dennis, N. Beacham, Ana Ciocarlan
{"title":"Investigating the Impact of Personality and Cognitive Efficiency on the Selection of Exercises for Learners","authors":"J. Okpo, J. Masthoff, Matt Dennis, N. Beacham, Ana Ciocarlan","doi":"10.1145/3079628.3079674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Adapting to learner characteristics is essential when selecting exercises for learners. This paper investigates how humans adapt next exercise selection to learner personality and invested mental effort to enable a future Intelligent Tutoring System to use these adaptations. Participants were presented with validated stories of a learner`s personality at polarised levels, a validated story conveying the mental effort invested in carrying out a given task and an indication of a previous performance (just passing) at a simple arithmetic exercise. Participants were also shown a selection of validated exercises of varying difficulty levels and asked to select the exercise which they thought the learner should do next. We found that overall more difficult exercises were selected for learners who used little effort than for learners who used more effort. We found that although an exercise of slightly harder difficulty remains the most popular choice in the high and low self-esteem conditions, for low self-esteem, participants picked an exercise of lower or the same difficulty more often than in the high condition.","PeriodicalId":216017,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3079628.3079674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Adapting to learner characteristics is essential when selecting exercises for learners. This paper investigates how humans adapt next exercise selection to learner personality and invested mental effort to enable a future Intelligent Tutoring System to use these adaptations. Participants were presented with validated stories of a learner`s personality at polarised levels, a validated story conveying the mental effort invested in carrying out a given task and an indication of a previous performance (just passing) at a simple arithmetic exercise. Participants were also shown a selection of validated exercises of varying difficulty levels and asked to select the exercise which they thought the learner should do next. We found that overall more difficult exercises were selected for learners who used little effort than for learners who used more effort. We found that although an exercise of slightly harder difficulty remains the most popular choice in the high and low self-esteem conditions, for low self-esteem, participants picked an exercise of lower or the same difficulty more often than in the high condition.
研究个性和认知效率对学习者练习选择的影响
在为学习者选择练习时,适应学习者的特点是必不可少的。本文研究了人类如何根据学习者的个性来调整下一个练习选择,并投入精力使未来的智能辅导系统能够使用这些适应。研究人员向参与者展示了两个极端水平的学习者性格的经过验证的故事,一个经过验证的故事传达了在完成给定任务时投入的精神努力,另一个是之前在简单算术练习中的表现(刚刚及格)。参与者还被展示了一系列不同难度的经过验证的练习,并被要求选择他们认为学习者下一步应该做的练习。我们发现,总体而言,那些努力较少的学习者比那些努力较多的学习者选择了更困难的练习。我们发现,尽管在高自尊和低自尊的情况下,难度稍微高一点的练习仍然是最受欢迎的选择,但在低自尊的情况下,参与者比高自尊的情况下更多地选择难度更低或相同的练习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信