Alternative Sanctions in the Republic of Serbia, Contemporary Challenges and Recommendations for Improvement

Jelena Kostić, Marina Matić Bošković
{"title":"Alternative Sanctions in the Republic of Serbia, Contemporary Challenges and Recommendations for Improvement","authors":"Jelena Kostić, Marina Matić Bošković","doi":"10.22364/iscflul.8.2.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The application of alternative sanctions has positive effects both on the re-socialization of perpetrators of criminal acts, and on the reduction of pressure on institutions for the enforcement of prison sanctions. The use of alternative sanctions enables the offender to continue working, educating, keeping family connections, and other activities that may have preventive effect on the crime re-commission and prevent stigmatisation that person might have after the prison sanction. The subject of this paper is the analysis of the effectiveness of the application of alternative sanctions in the Republic of Serbia and impact of the implementation of National development strategy for the system of enforcement of criminal sanctions for period 2013–2020. In line with the Strategy, the key national legislative acts were amended to align with international and European standards on alternative sanctions, specifically with the CoE European Probation Rules. Bearing in mind previous experiences, the authors start form the assumption that there are still certain challenges in their application, which can be caused by various factors. In order to give recommendations for reducing the challenges, the authors analyse the compliance of national regulation with international standards, as well as available data on volume and structure of imposed alternative sanctions in period 2015–2020, with the special focus on community work and conditional sanction with oversight.","PeriodicalId":314457,"journal":{"name":"New Legal Reality: Challenges and Perspectives. II","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Legal Reality: Challenges and Perspectives. II","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22364/iscflul.8.2.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The application of alternative sanctions has positive effects both on the re-socialization of perpetrators of criminal acts, and on the reduction of pressure on institutions for the enforcement of prison sanctions. The use of alternative sanctions enables the offender to continue working, educating, keeping family connections, and other activities that may have preventive effect on the crime re-commission and prevent stigmatisation that person might have after the prison sanction. The subject of this paper is the analysis of the effectiveness of the application of alternative sanctions in the Republic of Serbia and impact of the implementation of National development strategy for the system of enforcement of criminal sanctions for period 2013–2020. In line with the Strategy, the key national legislative acts were amended to align with international and European standards on alternative sanctions, specifically with the CoE European Probation Rules. Bearing in mind previous experiences, the authors start form the assumption that there are still certain challenges in their application, which can be caused by various factors. In order to give recommendations for reducing the challenges, the authors analyse the compliance of national regulation with international standards, as well as available data on volume and structure of imposed alternative sanctions in period 2015–2020, with the special focus on community work and conditional sanction with oversight.
塞尔维亚共和国的替代制裁、当代挑战和改进建议
实施替代制裁对犯罪行为者的重新社会化和减轻对执行监狱制裁的机构的压力都有积极的影响。使用替代制裁使罪犯能够继续工作、教育、保持家庭关系和其他活动,这些活动可能对再次犯罪产生预防作用,并防止他在监狱制裁后可能受到的侮辱。本文的主题是分析在塞尔维亚共和国实施替代制裁的有效性以及实施2013-2020年期间刑事制裁执行制度国家发展战略的影响。根据该战略,修订了主要的国家立法法案,以符合关于替代制裁的国际和欧洲标准,特别是欧洲委员会的《欧洲缓刑规则》。考虑到以前的经验,作者开始假设在应用中仍然存在一些挑战,这些挑战可能由各种因素引起。为了提出减少挑战的建议,作者分析了国家法规与国际标准的合规性,以及2015-2020年期间实施的替代制裁的数量和结构的现有数据,特别关注社区工作和有条件的监督制裁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信