Digital Feed-Forward Gas Flow Rate Control With a Switched Nozzle Valve

Christopher R. Martin, T. Batzel, Ethan H. Liebmann
{"title":"Digital Feed-Forward Gas Flow Rate Control With a Switched Nozzle Valve","authors":"Christopher R. Martin, T. Batzel, Ethan H. Liebmann","doi":"10.1115/imece2021-70549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This work presents the (SNV) approach for feed-forward gas flow rate control, the considerations included in the design of a prototype, and the results of its evaluation using a bell prover. The SNV uses a pulse-width modulation approach to provide inexpensive feed-forward gas flow rate control in contrast to closed-loop systems with thermal mass flow sensors. Attempts for feed-forward digital control of gas flow rate with throttling is usually frustrated by the difficulty of precisely and repeatably locating a throttle body to the precision required. The SNV uses a statically machined transonic nozzle to provide a mass flow rate insensitive to back-pressure for the on portion of the switching cycle. The severe pressure drop usually associated with sonic flow is almost entirely recovered by using a converging-diverging nozzle instead of a plain orifice, so that excellent metering can be achieved with drops as low as 11%.\n Uncertainty in the actual delivered flow is found to be ±1% of full scale. Back-pressure insensitivity is found to be ±0.5% up to 88% of the supply pressure. The operator design predicted that operation would be possible up to 100Hz, but actual performance was limited to roughly 33Hz. Unexpected minor quadratic behavior in the valve calibration and a single errant data suggest that the degraded performance is due to migration of lubricant inside the assembly.","PeriodicalId":112698,"journal":{"name":"Volume 10: Fluids Engineering","volume":"305 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 10: Fluids Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2021-70549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This work presents the (SNV) approach for feed-forward gas flow rate control, the considerations included in the design of a prototype, and the results of its evaluation using a bell prover. The SNV uses a pulse-width modulation approach to provide inexpensive feed-forward gas flow rate control in contrast to closed-loop systems with thermal mass flow sensors. Attempts for feed-forward digital control of gas flow rate with throttling is usually frustrated by the difficulty of precisely and repeatably locating a throttle body to the precision required. The SNV uses a statically machined transonic nozzle to provide a mass flow rate insensitive to back-pressure for the on portion of the switching cycle. The severe pressure drop usually associated with sonic flow is almost entirely recovered by using a converging-diverging nozzle instead of a plain orifice, so that excellent metering can be achieved with drops as low as 11%. Uncertainty in the actual delivered flow is found to be ±1% of full scale. Back-pressure insensitivity is found to be ±0.5% up to 88% of the supply pressure. The operator design predicted that operation would be possible up to 100Hz, but actual performance was limited to roughly 33Hz. Unexpected minor quadratic behavior in the valve calibration and a single errant data suggest that the degraded performance is due to migration of lubricant inside the assembly.
数字前馈气体流量控制与开关喷嘴阀
本文介绍了前馈气体流量控制的(SNV)方法,原型设计中包含的考虑因素,以及使用钟证明器对其进行评估的结果。与采用热质量流量传感器的闭环系统相比,SNV采用脉宽调制方法,提供廉价的前馈气体流量控制。尝试前馈数字控制气体流量与节流通常是受挫的困难,精确和重复定位的节流阀体的精度要求。SNV使用静态加工的跨音速喷嘴,在开关周期的on部分提供不受背压影响的质量流量。通常与声波流动相关的严重压降几乎完全可以通过使用会聚-发散喷嘴而不是普通孔板来恢复,因此可以实现低至11%的出色测量。实际输送流量的不确定度为满量程的±1%。背压不敏感值为±0.5%至88%的供应压力。操作器的设计预测操作可能高达100Hz,但实际性能限制在大约33Hz。阀门校准中意外的次要二次行为和单个错误数据表明,性能下降是由于总成内润滑剂的迁移。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信