A group recommender system for books based on fine-grained classification of comments

Jiaxin Ye, Huixiang Xiong, Jinpeng Guo, Xuan Meng
{"title":"A group recommender system for books based on fine-grained classification of comments","authors":"Jiaxin Ye, Huixiang Xiong, Jinpeng Guo, Xuan Meng","doi":"10.1108/el-11-2022-0252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this study is to investigate how book group recommendations can be used as a meaningful way to suggest suitable books to users, given the increasing number of individuals engaging in sharing and discussing books on the web.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors propose reviews fine-grained classification (CFGC) and its related models such as CFGC1 for book group recommendation. These models can categorize reviews successively by function and role. Constructing the BERT-BiLSTM model to classify the reviews by function. The frequency characteristics of the reviews are mined by word frequency analysis, and the relationship between reviews and total book score is mined by correlation analysis. Then, the reviews are classified into three roles: celebrity, general and passerby. Finally, the authors can form user groups, mine group features and combine group features with book fine-grained ratings to make book group recommendations.\n\n\nFindings\nOverall, the best recommendations are made by Synopsis comments, with the accuracy, recall, F-value and Hellinger distance of 52.9%, 60.0%, 56.3% and 0.163, respectively. The F1 index of the recommendations based on the author and the writing comments is improved by 2.5% and 0.4%, respectively, compared to the Synopsis comments.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nPrevious studies on book recommendation often recommend relevant books for users by mining the similarity between books, so the set of book recommendations recommended to users, especially to groups, always focuses on the few types. The proposed method can effectively ensure the diversity of recommendations by mining users’ tendency to different review attributes of books and recommending books for the groups. In addition, this study also investigates which types of reviews should be used to make book recommendations when targeting groups with specific tendencies.\n","PeriodicalId":330882,"journal":{"name":"Electron. Libr.","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electron. Libr.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/el-11-2022-0252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate how book group recommendations can be used as a meaningful way to suggest suitable books to users, given the increasing number of individuals engaging in sharing and discussing books on the web. Design/methodology/approach The authors propose reviews fine-grained classification (CFGC) and its related models such as CFGC1 for book group recommendation. These models can categorize reviews successively by function and role. Constructing the BERT-BiLSTM model to classify the reviews by function. The frequency characteristics of the reviews are mined by word frequency analysis, and the relationship between reviews and total book score is mined by correlation analysis. Then, the reviews are classified into three roles: celebrity, general and passerby. Finally, the authors can form user groups, mine group features and combine group features with book fine-grained ratings to make book group recommendations. Findings Overall, the best recommendations are made by Synopsis comments, with the accuracy, recall, F-value and Hellinger distance of 52.9%, 60.0%, 56.3% and 0.163, respectively. The F1 index of the recommendations based on the author and the writing comments is improved by 2.5% and 0.4%, respectively, compared to the Synopsis comments. Originality/value Previous studies on book recommendation often recommend relevant books for users by mining the similarity between books, so the set of book recommendations recommended to users, especially to groups, always focuses on the few types. The proposed method can effectively ensure the diversity of recommendations by mining users’ tendency to different review attributes of books and recommending books for the groups. In addition, this study also investigates which types of reviews should be used to make book recommendations when targeting groups with specific tendencies.
基于细粒度评论分类的图书群组推荐系统
本研究的目的是探讨图书小组推荐如何作为一种有意义的方式,向用户推荐合适的图书,因为越来越多的人参与在网络上分享和讨论图书。设计/方法/方法作者提出了书评细粒度分类(CFGC)及其相关模型,如CFGC1,用于图书群推荐。这些模型可以按功能和角色依次对评审进行分类。构建BERT-BiLSTM模型,按功能对评论进行分类。通过词频分析挖掘评论的频率特征,通过相关性分析挖掘评论与总分数之间的关系。然后,将评论分为三种角色:名人,一般和路人。最后,作者可以组建用户组,挖掘群组特征,并将群组特征与图书细粒度评分相结合,进行图书群组推荐。总体而言,摘要点评的推荐效果最好,其准确率为52.9%,召回率为60.0%,f值为56.3%,海灵格距离为0.163。基于作者和写作评论的推荐F1指数相对于摘要评论分别提高了2.5%和0.4%。原创性/价值以往的图书推荐研究往往是通过挖掘图书之间的相似度来为用户推荐相关的图书,因此向用户尤其是群体推荐的图书集合总是集中在少数类型上。该方法通过挖掘用户对图书不同评论属性的倾向,为群组推荐图书,有效保证了推荐的多样性。此外,本研究还探讨了在针对具有特定倾向的群体时,应该使用哪种类型的评论来进行图书推荐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信