The Centrality and Origins of Hypotheses

E. Montgomery
{"title":"The Centrality and Origins of Hypotheses","authors":"E. Montgomery","doi":"10.1093/MED/9780190912925.003.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hypotheses are central to the hypothetico-deductive approach in medical diagnosis and to the scientific method in research. Arguably, hypotheses are central to induction as reflected in the a priori problem of induction. Yet conspicuously absent from discussions of medical reasoning is any explicit critical analysis of the origin and quality of hypotheses as they often are attributed to some psychological process. However, there are specific manners in which hypotheses can be generated, such as by interpolation among and extrapolation beyond known knowledge claims such as data. Interpolations and extrapolations in the causal mechanisms that underlie knowledge claims can also generate hypotheses. Metaphors are a source as well. Perhaps an unrecognized metaphor critical to reductionism that underlies rationalist/allopathic medicine and biomedical research is the process metaphor. Each approach has advantages as well as risks. The latter can be estimated by the notion of epistemic risk, which contains epistemic distance and epistemic degrees of freedom.","PeriodicalId":309216,"journal":{"name":"Medical Reasoning","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Reasoning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/MED/9780190912925.003.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hypotheses are central to the hypothetico-deductive approach in medical diagnosis and to the scientific method in research. Arguably, hypotheses are central to induction as reflected in the a priori problem of induction. Yet conspicuously absent from discussions of medical reasoning is any explicit critical analysis of the origin and quality of hypotheses as they often are attributed to some psychological process. However, there are specific manners in which hypotheses can be generated, such as by interpolation among and extrapolation beyond known knowledge claims such as data. Interpolations and extrapolations in the causal mechanisms that underlie knowledge claims can also generate hypotheses. Metaphors are a source as well. Perhaps an unrecognized metaphor critical to reductionism that underlies rationalist/allopathic medicine and biomedical research is the process metaphor. Each approach has advantages as well as risks. The latter can be estimated by the notion of epistemic risk, which contains epistemic distance and epistemic degrees of freedom.
假设的中心性和起源
假设是医学诊断中的假设-演绎方法和研究中的科学方法的核心。可以说,假设是归纳法的核心,这反映在归纳法的先验问题中。然而,在医学推理的讨论中明显缺乏对假设的起源和质量的任何明确的批判性分析,因为它们通常归因于某些心理过程。然而,有一些特定的方式可以产生假设,例如通过数据等已知知识主张之间的插值和外推。作为知识主张基础的因果机制中的内插和外推也可以产生假设。隐喻也是一个来源。也许一个未被认识到的隐喻对理性主义/对抗疗法医学和生物医学研究背后的还原论至关重要,那就是过程隐喻。每种方法都有优点,也有风险。后者可以通过知识风险的概念来估计,知识风险包含知识距离和知识自由度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书