Possibilities of analysis of nominative signs in tasks of information security

V. Khitsenko, N. Fedotov
{"title":"Possibilities of analysis of nominative signs in tasks of information security","authors":"V. Khitsenko, N. Fedotov","doi":"10.17212/2782-2230-2022-1-61-84","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using various examples, the article demonstrates and discusses the possibilities of testing hypotheses and applying information measures to identify and assess the strength of the connection of nominative features in classification problems in the analysis of information security. The main type of presentation of the initial data in this scale is a contingency table of nominative features or an \"object-feature\" table, from which frequencies of coincidence of feature categories and a contingency table can be obtained. Using this table, it is easy to test the hypothesis of independence or homogeneity of features. An alternative approach to this analysis is considered based on the Kullback statistics, which is the average discriminating information in favor of the hypothesis of the dependence of features. In particular cases, the hypothesis of the symmetry of square tables is of practical interest, which can also be tested on the basis of information measures and criteria. An example of the processing of dichotomous data of the \"yes-no\" type according to the Cochran test is shown. The paper discusses ways to measure the strength of the connection of features. Illustrative examples of calculating measures based on chi-square statistics and directed measures are considered. The possibilities of various information characteristics are discussed in the form of a relative decrease in the entropy of one feature with a known other, or in the form of a weighted average amount of information falling on different categories of a feature. These measures are useful for comparative analysis of nominative features in decision-making problems. Shannon's informativeness index, Kullback-Leibler divergence, and a measure of pairwise differentiation of protection efficiency classes according to the laws of distribution of the corresponding categories of a feature are used. The classical procedures for testing hypotheses and approaches based on information characteristics are consistently compared. The methods and examples considered in the work cover many urgent problems of information security associated with nominative features.","PeriodicalId":207311,"journal":{"name":"Digital Technology Security","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Technology Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17212/2782-2230-2022-1-61-84","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using various examples, the article demonstrates and discusses the possibilities of testing hypotheses and applying information measures to identify and assess the strength of the connection of nominative features in classification problems in the analysis of information security. The main type of presentation of the initial data in this scale is a contingency table of nominative features or an "object-feature" table, from which frequencies of coincidence of feature categories and a contingency table can be obtained. Using this table, it is easy to test the hypothesis of independence or homogeneity of features. An alternative approach to this analysis is considered based on the Kullback statistics, which is the average discriminating information in favor of the hypothesis of the dependence of features. In particular cases, the hypothesis of the symmetry of square tables is of practical interest, which can also be tested on the basis of information measures and criteria. An example of the processing of dichotomous data of the "yes-no" type according to the Cochran test is shown. The paper discusses ways to measure the strength of the connection of features. Illustrative examples of calculating measures based on chi-square statistics and directed measures are considered. The possibilities of various information characteristics are discussed in the form of a relative decrease in the entropy of one feature with a known other, or in the form of a weighted average amount of information falling on different categories of a feature. These measures are useful for comparative analysis of nominative features in decision-making problems. Shannon's informativeness index, Kullback-Leibler divergence, and a measure of pairwise differentiation of protection efficiency classes according to the laws of distribution of the corresponding categories of a feature are used. The classical procedures for testing hypotheses and approaches based on information characteristics are consistently compared. The methods and examples considered in the work cover many urgent problems of information security associated with nominative features.
信息安全任务中指示符号分析的可能性
本文通过各种实例,论证和讨论了检验假设和应用信息度量的可能性,以识别和评估信息安全分析中分类问题中指定特征的连接强度。在这个尺度中,初始数据的主要表示形式是指性特征的列联表或“对象-特征”表,从中可以得到特征类别和列联表的重合频率。使用这个表,可以很容易地检验假设的独立性或同质性的特征。这种分析的另一种方法是基于Kullback统计量,这是有利于特征依赖性假设的平均判别信息。在特殊情况下,方桌对称的假设具有实际意义,它也可以在信息度量和标准的基础上进行检验。给出了根据Cochran检验处理“是-否”类型二分类数据的一个示例。本文讨论了特征连接强度的测量方法。考虑了基于卡方统计和定向测量计算测度的说明性例子。各种信息特征的可能性以一个特征与已知的另一个特征的熵相对减少的形式进行讨论,或者以落在特征的不同类别上的加权平均信息量的形式进行讨论。这些指标有助于比较分析决策问题的特征。使用香农信息指数、Kullback-Leibler散度以及根据特征对应类别的分布规律对保护效率类别进行两两区分的度量。检验假设的经典程序和基于信息特征的方法进行了一致的比较。在工作中考虑的方法和例子涵盖了许多紧迫的信息安全问题与指定的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信