Scalable program analysis through proof caching (doctoral symposium)

Andrea Aquino
{"title":"Scalable program analysis through proof caching (doctoral symposium)","authors":"Andrea Aquino","doi":"10.1145/2771783.2784773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the remarkable advances attained by the SMT community in the last decade, solving complex formulas still represents the main bottleneck to the scalability of program analysis techniques. Recent research work has shown that formulas generated during program analysis recur, and such redundancy can be captured and exploited by means of caching frameworks to avoid repeating complex queries to solvers. Although current approaches show that reusing formulas syntactically can indeed reduce the impact of SMT solvers on program analysis, they still suffer from being logic-dependent, and performing poorly on huge sets of heterogenous formulas. The core idea of our approach is to go beyond merely syntactical caching frameworks by designing a caching framework that is able to reuse proofs instead of formulas. In fact, even formulas that are syntactically different can share solutions. We aim to study the recurrence of proofs across heterogeneous formulas, and to define a technique to efficiently retrieve such proofs. We plan to exploit a suitable distance function that measures the amount of proofs shared by two formulas to allow the efficient retrieval of candidate proofs within a potentially large space of proofs. In this paper, we present the problem, draft the core idea, discuss the early results and present our research plans.","PeriodicalId":264859,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2015 International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2015 International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2771783.2784773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Despite the remarkable advances attained by the SMT community in the last decade, solving complex formulas still represents the main bottleneck to the scalability of program analysis techniques. Recent research work has shown that formulas generated during program analysis recur, and such redundancy can be captured and exploited by means of caching frameworks to avoid repeating complex queries to solvers. Although current approaches show that reusing formulas syntactically can indeed reduce the impact of SMT solvers on program analysis, they still suffer from being logic-dependent, and performing poorly on huge sets of heterogenous formulas. The core idea of our approach is to go beyond merely syntactical caching frameworks by designing a caching framework that is able to reuse proofs instead of formulas. In fact, even formulas that are syntactically different can share solutions. We aim to study the recurrence of proofs across heterogeneous formulas, and to define a technique to efficiently retrieve such proofs. We plan to exploit a suitable distance function that measures the amount of proofs shared by two formulas to allow the efficient retrieval of candidate proofs within a potentially large space of proofs. In this paper, we present the problem, draft the core idea, discuss the early results and present our research plans.
通过证明缓存进行可扩展程序分析(博士研讨会)
尽管SMT社区在过去十年中取得了显著的进步,但解决复杂的公式仍然是程序分析技术可扩展性的主要瓶颈。最近的研究工作表明,在程序分析过程中生成的公式是循环的,这种冗余可以通过缓存框架来捕获和利用,以避免对求解器重复复杂的查询。尽管目前的方法表明,在语法上重用公式确实可以减少SMT求解器对程序分析的影响,但它们仍然存在逻辑依赖的问题,并且在大量异构公式集上表现不佳。我们方法的核心思想是通过设计一个能够重用证明而不是公式的缓存框架来超越仅仅是语法缓存框架。事实上,即使是语法不同的公式也可以共享解决方案。我们的目的是研究跨异质公式的证明的递归性,并定义一种技术来有效地检索这样的证明。我们计划利用一个合适的距离函数来测量两个公式共享的证明的数量,以便在可能很大的证明空间内有效地检索候选证明。在本文中,我们提出了问题,起草了核心思想,讨论了早期的结果,并提出了我们的研究计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信