A short introduction to two approaches in formal verification of security protocols: model checking and theorem proving

Mohsen Pourpouneh, Rasoul Ramezanian
{"title":"A short introduction to two approaches in formal verification of security protocols: model checking and theorem proving","authors":"Mohsen Pourpouneh, Rasoul Ramezanian","doi":"10.22042/ISECURE.2016.8.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we shortly review two formal approaches in verification of security protocols; model checking and theorem proving. Model checking is based on studying the behavior of protocols via generating all deferent behaviors of a protocol and checking whether the desired goals are satisfied in all instances or not. We investigate Scyther operational semantics as n example of this approach and then we model and verify some famous security protocols using Scyther . Theorem proving is based on deriving the desired goals from assumption of protocols via a deduction system. We define a deduction system named Simple Logic for Authentication to formally define the notion of authenticated communication based on the structure of the messages, and then we several famous protocols using our proposed deduction system and compare it with the verification results of Scyther model checking.","PeriodicalId":436674,"journal":{"name":"ISC Int. J. Inf. Secur.","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISC Int. J. Inf. Secur.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22042/ISECURE.2016.8.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this paper, we shortly review two formal approaches in verification of security protocols; model checking and theorem proving. Model checking is based on studying the behavior of protocols via generating all deferent behaviors of a protocol and checking whether the desired goals are satisfied in all instances or not. We investigate Scyther operational semantics as n example of this approach and then we model and verify some famous security protocols using Scyther . Theorem proving is based on deriving the desired goals from assumption of protocols via a deduction system. We define a deduction system named Simple Logic for Authentication to formally define the notion of authenticated communication based on the structure of the messages, and then we several famous protocols using our proposed deduction system and compare it with the verification results of Scyther model checking.
简要介绍安全协议形式化验证的两种方法:模型检查和定理证明
在本文中,我们简要回顾了验证安全协议的两种正式方法;模型检验和定理证明。模型检查是通过生成协议的所有不同行为,并检查在所有实例中期望的目标是否得到满足来研究协议的行为。我们研究Scyther操作语义作为这种方法的一个例子,然后我们使用Scyther建模和验证一些著名的安全协议。定理证明的基础是通过演绎系统从协议的假设推导出期望的目标。我们定义了一个基于消息结构的Simple Logic for Authentication推理系统,对认证通信的概念进行了形式化的定义,然后使用我们提出的推理系统对几个著名的协议进行了比较,并将其与Scyther模型检验的验证结果进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信