{"title":"A short introduction to two approaches in formal verification of security protocols: model checking and theorem proving","authors":"Mohsen Pourpouneh, Rasoul Ramezanian","doi":"10.22042/ISECURE.2016.8.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we shortly review two formal approaches in verification of security protocols; model checking and theorem proving. Model checking is based on studying the behavior of protocols via generating all deferent behaviors of a protocol and checking whether the desired goals are satisfied in all instances or not. We investigate Scyther operational semantics as n example of this approach and then we model and verify some famous security protocols using Scyther . Theorem proving is based on deriving the desired goals from assumption of protocols via a deduction system. We define a deduction system named Simple Logic for Authentication to formally define the notion of authenticated communication based on the structure of the messages, and then we several famous protocols using our proposed deduction system and compare it with the verification results of Scyther model checking.","PeriodicalId":436674,"journal":{"name":"ISC Int. J. Inf. Secur.","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISC Int. J. Inf. Secur.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22042/ISECURE.2016.8.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
In this paper, we shortly review two formal approaches in verification of security protocols; model checking and theorem proving. Model checking is based on studying the behavior of protocols via generating all deferent behaviors of a protocol and checking whether the desired goals are satisfied in all instances or not. We investigate Scyther operational semantics as n example of this approach and then we model and verify some famous security protocols using Scyther . Theorem proving is based on deriving the desired goals from assumption of protocols via a deduction system. We define a deduction system named Simple Logic for Authentication to formally define the notion of authenticated communication based on the structure of the messages, and then we several famous protocols using our proposed deduction system and compare it with the verification results of Scyther model checking.
在本文中,我们简要回顾了验证安全协议的两种正式方法;模型检验和定理证明。模型检查是通过生成协议的所有不同行为,并检查在所有实例中期望的目标是否得到满足来研究协议的行为。我们研究Scyther操作语义作为这种方法的一个例子,然后我们使用Scyther建模和验证一些著名的安全协议。定理证明的基础是通过演绎系统从协议的假设推导出期望的目标。我们定义了一个基于消息结构的Simple Logic for Authentication推理系统,对认证通信的概念进行了形式化的定义,然后使用我们提出的推理系统对几个著名的协议进行了比较,并将其与Scyther模型检验的验证结果进行了比较。