Congenital Heart Defects Coexisting with Omphalocele - the Important Prognostic Factor

Ł. Sokołowski, M. Respondek-Liberska, M. Krekora, J. Płużańska, M. Słodki
{"title":"Congenital Heart Defects Coexisting with Omphalocele - the Important Prognostic Factor","authors":"Ł. Sokołowski, M. Respondek-Liberska, M. Krekora, J. Płużańska, M. Słodki","doi":"10.1515/pcard-2018-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the following parameters of fetuses and neonates with omphalocele: the prevalence of coexisting congenital heart defects (CHD), abnormalities in heart function and the impact of coexisting CHD on fetal and neonatal survival. Material and methods: The study group consisted of 69 fetuses with omphalocele diagnosed and monitored at the Department of Prenatal Cardiology in our Institute in the years 2007-2017. The retrospective analisis of patients' data was performed. For statistical analysis we used Chi-square test, t-Student test and U Mann-Whitney test.. Results: In the studied group omphalocele was an isolated defect in 31.9% of the cases (22/69), in 68.1% (47/69) coexisting defects were present, in 49.3% (34/69) the coexisting defect was CHD. The most common CHD coexisting with omphalocele were ventricular septal defect (VSD), double outlet right ventricle (DORV) and atrio-ventricular septal defect (AVSD). Abnormalities of heart function were present in 43.5% (30/69) of fetuses with omphalocele: 23.5% (8/34) with normal heart anatomy and in 62.9% (22/35) with CHD. Statistically significant differences between the group with normal heart anatomy and the group with CHD regarded: Cardiovascular Profile Score (CVPS) (median 10 points vs median 9 points, U Mann-Whitney test p=0.034), neonatal birth weight(mean 3253 g vs median 2700 g, U Mann-Whitney test p=0.003), Apgar score (median 8 vs median 7, U Mann-Whitney test p=0.038) and survival rate until discharge from hospital (85% vs 52.9%, Chi-square test p=0.034). The comparison of data from 2007-2017 with data obtained from similar analysis performed in our center in 1999-2006, revealed significant improvement in the early detection of omphalocele (median 14.5 weeks of gestation vs mean 25.4 weeks of gestation), gestational age of delivery (mean 38 weeks of gestation vs mean 34 weeks of gestation) and survival rate until discharge both in neonates with normal heart anatomy and coexisting CHD (85% and 52.9% vs 70% and 23% respectively) . Conclusions: 1. The presence of coexisting CHD is an important prognostic factor in fetuses and neonates with omphalocele, so early fetal echocardiography should be performed in every case of omphalocele. 2. During the last decade (2007-2017), in contrast to years 1999-2006, we observed significant improvement in early and complete prenatal diagnosis of omphalocele. 3. We observed improvement in strategy of obstetrical management resulting in delivering neonates in a more advanced gestational age both in the group with normal heart anatomy and the group with coexisting CHD.","PeriodicalId":415760,"journal":{"name":"Prenatal Cardiology","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prenatal Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pcard-2018-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the following parameters of fetuses and neonates with omphalocele: the prevalence of coexisting congenital heart defects (CHD), abnormalities in heart function and the impact of coexisting CHD on fetal and neonatal survival. Material and methods: The study group consisted of 69 fetuses with omphalocele diagnosed and monitored at the Department of Prenatal Cardiology in our Institute in the years 2007-2017. The retrospective analisis of patients' data was performed. For statistical analysis we used Chi-square test, t-Student test and U Mann-Whitney test.. Results: In the studied group omphalocele was an isolated defect in 31.9% of the cases (22/69), in 68.1% (47/69) coexisting defects were present, in 49.3% (34/69) the coexisting defect was CHD. The most common CHD coexisting with omphalocele were ventricular septal defect (VSD), double outlet right ventricle (DORV) and atrio-ventricular septal defect (AVSD). Abnormalities of heart function were present in 43.5% (30/69) of fetuses with omphalocele: 23.5% (8/34) with normal heart anatomy and in 62.9% (22/35) with CHD. Statistically significant differences between the group with normal heart anatomy and the group with CHD regarded: Cardiovascular Profile Score (CVPS) (median 10 points vs median 9 points, U Mann-Whitney test p=0.034), neonatal birth weight(mean 3253 g vs median 2700 g, U Mann-Whitney test p=0.003), Apgar score (median 8 vs median 7, U Mann-Whitney test p=0.038) and survival rate until discharge from hospital (85% vs 52.9%, Chi-square test p=0.034). The comparison of data from 2007-2017 with data obtained from similar analysis performed in our center in 1999-2006, revealed significant improvement in the early detection of omphalocele (median 14.5 weeks of gestation vs mean 25.4 weeks of gestation), gestational age of delivery (mean 38 weeks of gestation vs mean 34 weeks of gestation) and survival rate until discharge both in neonates with normal heart anatomy and coexisting CHD (85% and 52.9% vs 70% and 23% respectively) . Conclusions: 1. The presence of coexisting CHD is an important prognostic factor in fetuses and neonates with omphalocele, so early fetal echocardiography should be performed in every case of omphalocele. 2. During the last decade (2007-2017), in contrast to years 1999-2006, we observed significant improvement in early and complete prenatal diagnosis of omphalocele. 3. We observed improvement in strategy of obstetrical management resulting in delivering neonates in a more advanced gestational age both in the group with normal heart anatomy and the group with coexisting CHD.
先天性心脏缺陷合并脐膨出——重要的预后因素
摘要简介:本研究旨在评估脐膨出胎儿及新生儿并发先天性心脏缺陷(CHD)的患病率、心功能异常及并发先天性心脏缺陷对胎儿及新生儿生存的影响。材料与方法:研究对象为2007-2017年在我院产前心内科诊断并监测的69例脐膨出胎儿。对患者资料进行回顾性分析。统计分析采用卡方检验、t-Student检验和U Mann-Whitney检验。结果:本组脐膨出为孤立性缺陷占31.9%(22/69),并存缺陷占68.1%(47/69),并存缺陷占49.3%(34/69)。室间隔缺损(VSD)、右心室双出口(DORV)和房室间隔缺损(AVSD)是最常见的合并脐膨出的冠心病。脐膨出胎儿的心功能异常占43.5%(30/69),心脏解剖正常胎儿的心功能异常占23.5%(8/34),冠心病胎儿的心功能异常占62.9%(22/35)。心脏解剖正常组与冠心病组的心血管特征评分(CVPS)(中位数10分vs中位数9分,U Mann-Whitney检验p=0.034)、新生儿出生体重(平均3253 g vs中位数2700 g, U Mann-Whitney检验p=0.003)、Apgar评分(中位数8 vs中位数7,U Mann-Whitney检验p=0.038)和出院前生存率(85% vs 52.9%,卡方检验p=0.034)具有统计学意义。将2007-2017年的数据与本中心1999-2006年类似分析的数据进行比较,发现心脏解剖正常且合并冠心病的新生儿在脐膨出的早期发现(中位妊娠14.5周vs平均妊娠25.4周)、分娩胎龄(平均妊娠38周vs平均妊娠34周)和出院存活率(分别为85%和52.9% vs 70%和23%)均有显著改善。结论:1。同时存在冠心病是胎儿和新生儿脐膨出的重要预后因素,因此对任何一例脐膨出都应进行早期胎儿超声心动图检查。2. 在过去十年(2007-2017)中,与1999-2006年相比,我们观察到脐膨出的早期和完整产前诊断显着改善。3.我们观察到,在心脏解剖正常组和合并冠心病组中,产科管理策略的改善导致新生儿在更早的胎龄分娩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信