Sensitivity Analysis of Tracking Point for A Visual Tracking System on Lower Limb Joint Assessment

L. C. Chin, Marwan Affandi, M. N. Shah, S. Basah, T. Jian, Muhammad Yazid Din
{"title":"Sensitivity Analysis of Tracking Point for A Visual Tracking System on Lower Limb Joint Assessment","authors":"L. C. Chin, Marwan Affandi, M. N. Shah, S. Basah, T. Jian, Muhammad Yazid Din","doi":"10.1109/IICAIET51634.2021.9573938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"No matter accurate that putting a sensor in its place there is always a possibility that the position of the sensor is not correct. An inaccurate position may produce an error, which eventually affects the result of the measurement. Sensitivity analysis is intended to determine the amount of error that may occur in measurement by varying important parameters slightly in that measurement and calculating the change of the result. In this paper, sensitivity analysis was simulated in the visual tracking system for lower limb joint measurements. In doing the measurements, markers were put on the limbs of the patients at determined positions. Sensitivity analysis was then simulated by moving the points slightly. There was a total of 729 possible positions coming from three marker positions. The effects of the changes for the distances to be measured were analyzed. It is found that the errors depend on the size of the marker; for a 10-mm marker, the maximum error is only 7.85%, which is relatively small for practical application. When the marker diameter is 13 mm, the maximum error is slightly over 10%, which is still acceptable for practical purposes. There are exactly 27 positions that do not produce errors. Knowing these positions will help the user to reduce the error that may occur during the measurement.","PeriodicalId":234229,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Engineering and Technology (IICAIET)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Engineering and Technology (IICAIET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IICAIET51634.2021.9573938","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

No matter accurate that putting a sensor in its place there is always a possibility that the position of the sensor is not correct. An inaccurate position may produce an error, which eventually affects the result of the measurement. Sensitivity analysis is intended to determine the amount of error that may occur in measurement by varying important parameters slightly in that measurement and calculating the change of the result. In this paper, sensitivity analysis was simulated in the visual tracking system for lower limb joint measurements. In doing the measurements, markers were put on the limbs of the patients at determined positions. Sensitivity analysis was then simulated by moving the points slightly. There was a total of 729 possible positions coming from three marker positions. The effects of the changes for the distances to be measured were analyzed. It is found that the errors depend on the size of the marker; for a 10-mm marker, the maximum error is only 7.85%, which is relatively small for practical application. When the marker diameter is 13 mm, the maximum error is slightly over 10%, which is still acceptable for practical purposes. There are exactly 27 positions that do not produce errors. Knowing these positions will help the user to reduce the error that may occur during the measurement.
下肢关节评估视觉跟踪系统跟踪点灵敏度分析
无论将传感器放置在其位置是否准确,总有可能传感器的位置不正确。不准确的位置可能产生误差,最终影响测量结果。灵敏度分析旨在通过稍微改变测量中的重要参数并计算结果的变化来确定测量中可能发生的误差量。本文对下肢关节测量视觉跟踪系统的灵敏度分析进行了仿真。在进行测量时,在确定的位置将标记放在患者的四肢上。然后通过稍微移动点来模拟灵敏度分析。总共有729个可能的位置来自三个标记位置。分析了这些变化对被测距离的影响。研究发现,误差与标记的大小有关;对于10mm的标记,最大误差仅为7.85%,对于实际应用来说是比较小的。当标记直径为13mm时,最大误差略大于10%,在实际使用中仍然可以接受。总共有27个位置不会产生误差。了解这些位置将有助于用户减少测量过程中可能发生的误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信