Aging Offenders from the Standpoint of Criminal Law

E. Rakhmanova
{"title":"Aging Offenders from the Standpoint of Criminal Law","authors":"E. Rakhmanova","doi":"10.37399/ISSN2686-9241.2020.1.189-206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. In recent decades, a steady increase in the population of elderly people and a decrease in minors and youth have been reported all over the world. These processes present certain problems, including for the criminal justice system. Most crimes are still committed by persons under the age of 30. However, a demographic shift towards the elderly, particularly, in response to social problems senior citizens are increasingly faced with, may mean that we should expect increased crime on the part of persons aged 50 and older. Although the said processes seem obvious, little attention is still given to the problems of age-related crime. There is not enough data on the extent of crimes committed by the elderly. Theoretical Basis. Methods. In terms of methodology, the study was based on general scientific methods (analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, a system analysis method) and methods of legal science (methods of comparative law, methods of literal, systematic and historical interpretation of legal norms). The theoretical basis of the work was the scientific works of Russian and foreign experts in the field of criminal law, criminology, psychology, gerontology. Results. Analysis of legislation and scientific literature indicates that no single concept of old age has yet been developed. The criminal law has not provided for a single age limit for several types of criminal liability. At the same time, some scientists suggest that a threshold for age-related liability should be established, elderly age considered a circumstance that mitigates and even exempts from criminal liability, and that a sentence of imprisonment should not be imposed on persons aged 80 and older, etc. Discussion and Conclusion. Analysis the regulatory legal acts of the Russian Federation and judicial practice, existing theoretical provisions has led to the conclusion that the legislator should define the “elderly” age, and first of all, proceed from the principle of the equality of all before the law and the presumption of sanity when determining the criminal legal meaning of the age of a person who committed a crime.","PeriodicalId":184770,"journal":{"name":"Pravosudie / Justice","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pravosudie / Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37399/ISSN2686-9241.2020.1.189-206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. In recent decades, a steady increase in the population of elderly people and a decrease in minors and youth have been reported all over the world. These processes present certain problems, including for the criminal justice system. Most crimes are still committed by persons under the age of 30. However, a demographic shift towards the elderly, particularly, in response to social problems senior citizens are increasingly faced with, may mean that we should expect increased crime on the part of persons aged 50 and older. Although the said processes seem obvious, little attention is still given to the problems of age-related crime. There is not enough data on the extent of crimes committed by the elderly. Theoretical Basis. Methods. In terms of methodology, the study was based on general scientific methods (analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, a system analysis method) and methods of legal science (methods of comparative law, methods of literal, systematic and historical interpretation of legal norms). The theoretical basis of the work was the scientific works of Russian and foreign experts in the field of criminal law, criminology, psychology, gerontology. Results. Analysis of legislation and scientific literature indicates that no single concept of old age has yet been developed. The criminal law has not provided for a single age limit for several types of criminal liability. At the same time, some scientists suggest that a threshold for age-related liability should be established, elderly age considered a circumstance that mitigates and even exempts from criminal liability, and that a sentence of imprisonment should not be imposed on persons aged 80 and older, etc. Discussion and Conclusion. Analysis the regulatory legal acts of the Russian Federation and judicial practice, existing theoretical provisions has led to the conclusion that the legislator should define the “elderly” age, and first of all, proceed from the principle of the equality of all before the law and the presumption of sanity when determining the criminal legal meaning of the age of a person who committed a crime.
从刑法的角度看老年罪犯
介绍。近几十年来,据报道,世界各地的老年人人口稳步增加,未成年人和青年人口减少。这些进程带来了某些问题,包括刑事司法系统的问题。大多数罪行仍然是由30岁以下的人犯下的。然而,人口结构向老年人的转变,特别是老年人日益面临的社会问题,可能意味着我们应该预期50岁及以上的人的犯罪率会增加。尽管上述过程似乎显而易见,但与年龄有关的犯罪问题仍然很少受到关注。关于老年人犯罪的程度,没有足够的数据。理论基础。方法。在方法论上,本研究以一般科学方法(分析与综合、归纳与演绎、系统分析方法)和法学方法(比较法方法、对法律规范的文字、系统和历史解释方法)为基础。这项工作的理论基础是俄罗斯和外国专家在刑法、犯罪学、心理学、老年学领域的科学著作。结果。对立法和科学文献的分析表明,尚未形成单一的老年概念。刑法没有对几种刑事责任规定单一的年龄限制。与此同时,一些科学家提出,应该设定年龄责任的门槛,将老年视为减轻甚至免除刑事责任的情况,不应该对80岁及以上的人判处监禁等。讨论与结论。分析俄罗斯联邦的规范性法律行为和司法实践,现有的理论规定得出的结论是,立法者在确定“老年”年龄时,首先应从法律面前人人平等的原则和精神健全的推定出发,确定犯罪人年龄的刑事法律意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信