Comparison of Solar Thermal Collectors and Solar PV Heat Pump Systems

Frederick B. Mitri, K. Anderson
{"title":"Comparison of Solar Thermal Collectors and Solar PV Heat Pump Systems","authors":"Frederick B. Mitri, K. Anderson","doi":"10.1115/es2022-81560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper presents a comparison between traditional flat plate solar thermal collector systems and solar photovoltaic (PV) heat pump systems. The purpose of this analysis was to determine whether or not heat pump technology has matured to the point that a solar PV system paired with a heat pump could outperform a traditional solar thermal flat plate collector system. To this end, two systems with identical panel footprints of 7.6 m2 (82 ft2) were modelled and analyzed at four different locations being Los Angeles CA, Phoenix AZ, Seattle WA, and Denver CO. The expected energy production and Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) for both systems at these locations were determined. The solar fraction for the solar thermal collector systems and PV heat pump systems at the four locations studied were found to be f = 0.44 and f = 0.99 in Los Angeles, f = 0.44 and f = 1.00 in Phoenix, f = 0.21 and f = 0.62 in Seattle, and f = 0.34 and f = 0.90 in Denver. As such, it is evident that the solar PV heat pump systems produced more thermal energy than the solar thermal collectors at all locations tested. The LCOE for the solar thermal collector systems and solar PV heat pump systems at each location were found to be 48.42 ¢/kWh and 36.57 ¢/kWh at Los Angeles, 55.37 ¢/kWh and 36.13 ¢/kWh at Phoenix, 81.47 ¢/kWh and 97.29 ¢/kWh at Seattle, and 52.27 ¢/kWh and 67.50 ¢/kWh at Denver. From these values, it can be seen that the solar PV heat pump systems have a lower LCOE in the warmer climates where ground source heat pumps are not needed but have slightly higher LCOE values in cooler climates where they are. As such, this study has found that solar PV heat pump systems have matured enough to outperform solar thermal flat plate collectors in most situations.","PeriodicalId":384147,"journal":{"name":"ASME 2022 16th International Conference on Energy Sustainability","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASME 2022 16th International Conference on Energy Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/es2022-81560","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents a comparison between traditional flat plate solar thermal collector systems and solar photovoltaic (PV) heat pump systems. The purpose of this analysis was to determine whether or not heat pump technology has matured to the point that a solar PV system paired with a heat pump could outperform a traditional solar thermal flat plate collector system. To this end, two systems with identical panel footprints of 7.6 m2 (82 ft2) were modelled and analyzed at four different locations being Los Angeles CA, Phoenix AZ, Seattle WA, and Denver CO. The expected energy production and Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) for both systems at these locations were determined. The solar fraction for the solar thermal collector systems and PV heat pump systems at the four locations studied were found to be f = 0.44 and f = 0.99 in Los Angeles, f = 0.44 and f = 1.00 in Phoenix, f = 0.21 and f = 0.62 in Seattle, and f = 0.34 and f = 0.90 in Denver. As such, it is evident that the solar PV heat pump systems produced more thermal energy than the solar thermal collectors at all locations tested. The LCOE for the solar thermal collector systems and solar PV heat pump systems at each location were found to be 48.42 ¢/kWh and 36.57 ¢/kWh at Los Angeles, 55.37 ¢/kWh and 36.13 ¢/kWh at Phoenix, 81.47 ¢/kWh and 97.29 ¢/kWh at Seattle, and 52.27 ¢/kWh and 67.50 ¢/kWh at Denver. From these values, it can be seen that the solar PV heat pump systems have a lower LCOE in the warmer climates where ground source heat pumps are not needed but have slightly higher LCOE values in cooler climates where they are. As such, this study has found that solar PV heat pump systems have matured enough to outperform solar thermal flat plate collectors in most situations.
太阳能集热器与太阳能光伏热泵系统的比较
本文对传统的平板太阳能集热器系统和太阳能光伏热泵系统进行了比较。本分析的目的是确定热泵技术是否已经成熟到与热泵配对的太阳能光伏系统可以胜过传统的太阳能热平板集热器系统的程度。为此,两个面板占地面积相同的系统分别在洛杉矶、凤凰城、西雅图和丹佛四个不同的地点进行建模和分析。确定了这两个系统在这些地点的预期能源产量和平化能源成本(LCOE)。四个地点的太阳能集热器系统和光伏热泵系统的太阳能分数分别为:洛杉矶的f = 0.44和f = 0.99,凤凰城的f = 0.44和f = 1.00,西雅图的f = 0.21和f = 0.62,丹佛的f = 0.34和f = 0.90。因此,很明显,在所有测试地点,太阳能光伏热泵系统比太阳能集热器产生更多的热能。洛杉矶的太阳能集热器系统和太阳能光伏热泵系统的LCOE分别为48.42美分/kWh和36.57美分/kWh,凤凰城分别为55.37美分/kWh和36.13美分/kWh,西雅图分别为81.47美分/kWh和97.29美分/kWh,丹佛分别为52.27美分/kWh和67.50美分/kWh。从这些值可以看出,在较温暖的气候条件下,不需要地源热泵,太阳能光伏热泵系统的LCOE较低,而在较冷的气候条件下,太阳能光伏热泵系统的LCOE略高。因此,本研究发现太阳能光伏热泵系统已经足够成熟,在大多数情况下优于太阳能热平板集热器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信