Legal Principles of Social Entrepreneurship. Part 2

Z. Sinkevich
{"title":"Legal Principles of Social Entrepreneurship. Part 2","authors":"Z. Sinkevich","doi":"10.26516/2071-8136.2022.1.62","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is a continuation of the research presented in the previous issue of the journal. In the first part of the work, the basic principles of regulation of social and legal relations in the provision of social services are considered, the combination of private and public principles is analyzed, the principle of the balance of private and public interests in the system of provision of social services, general principles of constitutional and civil law, and social security law are analyzed. Possible variants of combination of principles based in public and private sectors in relations for the provision of social services are considered. This paper analyzes the legal principles of social entrepreneurship. Particular attention is paid to the principle of freedom of contract, which is presented through the prism of freedom to provide social services. The features of the manifestation of freedom in contracts of a public nature have been determined. Taking into account the involvement of both state institutions and entities belonging to all forms of ownership in the provision of services, an analysis of the application of the principles of competition, the professionalism of providers of social services is presented. Problems are identified and conclusions are drawn regarding the consideration of social services as a type of social entrepreneurship and the possibility of applying norms on entrepreneurial activity to these relations. The article presents a comparative characteristic of the fundamental provisions of constitutional, civil and social security norms. Taking into account the public nature of relations of social security law, it was concluded that the civil legal essence of social services is influenced by public norms in the process of recognizing the right to receive social services, the establishment of criteria or the absence of criteria for the gratuitous nature of the service received or for partial payment, the choice of a provider of social services among those who have the right to provide them.","PeriodicalId":126097,"journal":{"name":"Siberian Law Herald","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Siberian Law Herald","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26516/2071-8136.2022.1.62","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is a continuation of the research presented in the previous issue of the journal. In the first part of the work, the basic principles of regulation of social and legal relations in the provision of social services are considered, the combination of private and public principles is analyzed, the principle of the balance of private and public interests in the system of provision of social services, general principles of constitutional and civil law, and social security law are analyzed. Possible variants of combination of principles based in public and private sectors in relations for the provision of social services are considered. This paper analyzes the legal principles of social entrepreneurship. Particular attention is paid to the principle of freedom of contract, which is presented through the prism of freedom to provide social services. The features of the manifestation of freedom in contracts of a public nature have been determined. Taking into account the involvement of both state institutions and entities belonging to all forms of ownership in the provision of services, an analysis of the application of the principles of competition, the professionalism of providers of social services is presented. Problems are identified and conclusions are drawn regarding the consideration of social services as a type of social entrepreneurship and the possibility of applying norms on entrepreneurial activity to these relations. The article presents a comparative characteristic of the fundamental provisions of constitutional, civil and social security norms. Taking into account the public nature of relations of social security law, it was concluded that the civil legal essence of social services is influenced by public norms in the process of recognizing the right to receive social services, the establishment of criteria or the absence of criteria for the gratuitous nature of the service received or for partial payment, the choice of a provider of social services among those who have the right to provide them.
社会企业的法律原则。第2部分
这篇文章是该杂志上一期研究的延续。第一部分论述了社会服务提供中调节社会关系和法律关系的基本原则,分析了私人与公共原则相结合的原则,分析了社会服务提供体系中私人与公共利益平衡的原则,分析了宪法和民法的一般原则以及社会保障法。考虑了在提供社会服务的关系中结合公共和私营部门原则的可能变体。本文分析了社会企业家精神的法律原则。特别注意契约自由原则,这一原则是通过提供社会服务的自由这一棱镜提出的。自由在公共性契约中的表现特征已经确定。考虑到国家机构和属于各种所有制形式的实体在提供服务方面的参与,对竞争原则的应用进行了分析,并提出了社会服务提供者的专业性。在将社会服务视为一种社会企业精神以及将企业活动规范适用于这些关系的可能性方面,确定了问题并得出结论。本文提出了宪法、民事和社会保障规范基本条款的比较特点。考虑到社会保障法关系的公共性质,得出的结论是,社会服务的民事法律本质受到以下方面的公共规范的影响:承认接受社会服务的权利、所接受的服务的无偿性质或部分支付的标准的确立或缺乏标准、在有权提供社会服务的人中选择社会服务提供者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信