Study of the temporomandibular disorders (TMD) with Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with active and passive mouth opening

Ch. Papadeli, C. Kouskouras, G. Venetis, Adamantia Filippou
{"title":"Study of the temporomandibular disorders (TMD) with Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with active and passive mouth opening","authors":"Ch. Papadeli, C. Kouskouras, G. Venetis, Adamantia Filippou","doi":"10.54936/haoms2412535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY: Objectives: TMD evaluation heavily relies on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In several investigations, the MRI examination results do not support the clinical diagnosis. The clinical examination’s diagnostic precision varies, falling between 54 and 90 percent. Our working theory holds that the method used to acquire the MRI is what allows for the acquisition of objective diagnostic findings. Materials and Method: The RDC-TMD diagnostic technique identified 30 patients as having “anterior displacement with reduction as the subjects. The results of the MRI test performed with the mouth closed supported the clinical diagnosis. The distance between the center of the condyle head and the apex of the articular eminence for each joint, as well as the range of motion of the condyle by passive mouth opening (biting a 60ml syringe plunger) and by active maximal mouth opening, without the use of an intraoral appliance, were calculated for each patient in the closed mouth position. Results: The condyle has a wider range of motion with the active opening typically, but the passive opening typically hides subluxation due to hypermobility.Conclusion: Our data underwent statistical analysis, which demonstrated that active and passive opening are two distinct techniques that provide access to various imaging findings.","PeriodicalId":164809,"journal":{"name":"Hellenic Archives of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hellenic Archives of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54936/haoms2412535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

SUMMARY: Objectives: TMD evaluation heavily relies on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In several investigations, the MRI examination results do not support the clinical diagnosis. The clinical examination’s diagnostic precision varies, falling between 54 and 90 percent. Our working theory holds that the method used to acquire the MRI is what allows for the acquisition of objective diagnostic findings. Materials and Method: The RDC-TMD diagnostic technique identified 30 patients as having “anterior displacement with reduction as the subjects. The results of the MRI test performed with the mouth closed supported the clinical diagnosis. The distance between the center of the condyle head and the apex of the articular eminence for each joint, as well as the range of motion of the condyle by passive mouth opening (biting a 60ml syringe plunger) and by active maximal mouth opening, without the use of an intraoral appliance, were calculated for each patient in the closed mouth position. Results: The condyle has a wider range of motion with the active opening typically, but the passive opening typically hides subluxation due to hypermobility.Conclusion: Our data underwent statistical analysis, which demonstrated that active and passive opening are two distinct techniques that provide access to various imaging findings.
主动和被动张口的颞下颌紊乱(TMD)的磁共振成像研究
摘要:目的:TMD评估严重依赖于磁共振成像(MRI)。在一些调查中,MRI检查结果不支持临床诊断。临床检查的诊断准确率各不相同,在54%到90%之间。我们的工作理论认为,用于获得MRI的方法是允许获得客观诊断结果的。材料与方法:采用RDC-TMD诊断技术对30例“前路移位伴复位”患者进行诊断。闭口MRI检查结果支持临床诊断。计算每位闭口位患者在不使用口腔内矫治器的情况下,被动开口(咬60ml注射器柱塞)和主动最大开口时髁突的运动范围,以及每个关节的髁突头中心到关节隆起顶点的距离。结果:主动开口的髁突活动范围较大,而被动开口的髁突由于活动过度而隐藏半脱位。结论:我们的数据经过统计分析,表明主动和被动开放是两种不同的技术,可以提供不同的成像结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信