Who Engaged First?

James S. Pula
{"title":"Who Engaged First?","authors":"James S. Pula","doi":"10.1353/get.2015.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Who Engaged First? matter appears to increase as years roll onward, owing, no doubt, largely to the now universally conceded fact that it was upon the fi eld of Gettysburg that the crisis of resistance was passed, and the supremacy of the Union irrevocably established. Th e credit and the honor of the opening of the battle upon which hinged issues so momentous as those which presented themselves on that fi eld will scarce repeat itself in an age, not at all likely in a century, much less within the lifetime of any one individual. Th e Army of the Potomac, on that occasion, fairly symbolized the spearhead in rear of which have ever followed progress, enlightenment, and the elevation of the human race. In regard to the claims from the other arms of the service, it is generally understood that unless a battle be one confi ned to the cavalry arm it is not opened until the infantry become engaged, and taking this view of it, the honor of the opening fi re of the battle may fairly be claimed to belong to the offi cers and men of the 56th regiment, Pennsylvania volunteers,— to its offi cers and men,— not to any individual offi cer or man, as has been claimed in some instances, but to the regiment as a unit; and it was the result, in a large measure, to long, persistent, hard work, and an intelligent and cheerful concession on the part of the offi cers and men to all the discomforts imposed upon them to fi t them to give an instantaneous response when the moment for action arrived. Th eir fi re was “by battalion;” therefore, as stated, the honor belongs to no individual, but to the regiment as a unit. General Cutler, who commanded the brigade, Although the Gettysburg campaign ended in July 1863, the fi ghting did not. It merely assumed another form. One of the vehicles for continued confl ict was the National Tribune, a monthly newspaper that began publishing in 1877. Quite soon its pages included the reminiscences of former soldiers, both offi cers and men alike, especially in the “Fighting Th em Over” section in which correspondents shared their own memories and promoted their own versions of history. It did not take long for verbal jousts to emerge as the memories of the participants oft en clashed with each other on issues both large and small. One question that brought forth considerable debate was which Federal unit claimed the honor of being fi rst engaged. Th is question emerged periodically over the years, including an exchange of several letters in the summer of 1884. What prompted it is unknown since the several issues before the two letters that appeared in the March 20 issue do not appear to have mentioned it. Regardless, over the next few months several letters were exchanged by men promoting their own units. Although it was obvious that Gen. John Buford’s cavalry was the fi rst to fi re on the Rebels, most of the correspondents, like our fi rst correspondent below, discounted the cavalry’s claims, maintaining that the battle had not truly joined until the infantry became engaged. Th e fi rst was from J. William Hofmann, who had served as colonel of the Fift ySixth Pennsylvania Infantry.1","PeriodicalId":268075,"journal":{"name":"Gettysburg Magazine","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gettysburg Magazine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/get.2015.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Who Engaged First? matter appears to increase as years roll onward, owing, no doubt, largely to the now universally conceded fact that it was upon the fi eld of Gettysburg that the crisis of resistance was passed, and the supremacy of the Union irrevocably established. Th e credit and the honor of the opening of the battle upon which hinged issues so momentous as those which presented themselves on that fi eld will scarce repeat itself in an age, not at all likely in a century, much less within the lifetime of any one individual. Th e Army of the Potomac, on that occasion, fairly symbolized the spearhead in rear of which have ever followed progress, enlightenment, and the elevation of the human race. In regard to the claims from the other arms of the service, it is generally understood that unless a battle be one confi ned to the cavalry arm it is not opened until the infantry become engaged, and taking this view of it, the honor of the opening fi re of the battle may fairly be claimed to belong to the offi cers and men of the 56th regiment, Pennsylvania volunteers,— to its offi cers and men,— not to any individual offi cer or man, as has been claimed in some instances, but to the regiment as a unit; and it was the result, in a large measure, to long, persistent, hard work, and an intelligent and cheerful concession on the part of the offi cers and men to all the discomforts imposed upon them to fi t them to give an instantaneous response when the moment for action arrived. Th eir fi re was “by battalion;” therefore, as stated, the honor belongs to no individual, but to the regiment as a unit. General Cutler, who commanded the brigade, Although the Gettysburg campaign ended in July 1863, the fi ghting did not. It merely assumed another form. One of the vehicles for continued confl ict was the National Tribune, a monthly newspaper that began publishing in 1877. Quite soon its pages included the reminiscences of former soldiers, both offi cers and men alike, especially in the “Fighting Th em Over” section in which correspondents shared their own memories and promoted their own versions of history. It did not take long for verbal jousts to emerge as the memories of the participants oft en clashed with each other on issues both large and small. One question that brought forth considerable debate was which Federal unit claimed the honor of being fi rst engaged. Th is question emerged periodically over the years, including an exchange of several letters in the summer of 1884. What prompted it is unknown since the several issues before the two letters that appeared in the March 20 issue do not appear to have mentioned it. Regardless, over the next few months several letters were exchanged by men promoting their own units. Although it was obvious that Gen. John Buford’s cavalry was the fi rst to fi re on the Rebels, most of the correspondents, like our fi rst correspondent below, discounted the cavalry’s claims, maintaining that the battle had not truly joined until the infantry became engaged. Th e fi rst was from J. William Hofmann, who had served as colonel of the Fift ySixth Pennsylvania Infantry.1
谁先订婚的?
谁先订婚的?随着时间的推移,事情似乎越来越多,毫无疑问,这主要是由于现在普遍承认的事实,即在葛底斯堡战场上,抵抗的危机被克服了,联邦的至高无上地位无可挽回地确立了。这一战场上出现的如此重大的问题都与这场战役的爆发有关,而它所带来的荣誉和荣誉在一个时代里是很难重现的,一个世纪也不太可能,更不用说在任何人的有生之年了。在那个时候,波托马克河的军队完全代表了在它后面追随进步、启蒙和人类进步的先锋队。关于索赔服务的其他武器,通常理解,除非骑兵的战斗是一个进行手臂不打开直到步兵订婚,并采取这种观点,开幕式fi再保险的荣誉战斗很可能声称属于办公室cer第56团和男人,宾夕法尼亚州的志愿者,到其办公室的cer和男性——而不是任何个人的办公室cer或人,已经声称在某些情况下,而是以团为单位;在很大程度上,这是长期坚持不懈的艰苦工作的结果,是官兵明智而愉快地对强加在他们身上的种种不适作出让步的结果,这是为了使他们在行动的时刻到来时立即作出反应。他们的射击是“以营为单位”,因此,如前所述,荣誉不属于个人,而属于作为一个单位的团。虽然葛底斯堡战役于1863年7月结束,但战斗并没有结束。它只是换了一种形式。1877年开始出版的月刊《国家论坛报》(National Tribune)是持续冲突的媒介之一。很快,它的页面就包含了前士兵的回忆,包括军官和士兵,特别是在“为他们而战”部分,记者们分享了他们自己的记忆,并宣传了他们自己的历史版本。由于参与者的记忆经常在大大小小的问题上相互冲突,很快就出现了口头上的比拼。有一个问题引起了相当大的争论,那就是哪个联邦单位声称是第一个参战的。这个问题多年来定期出现,包括1884年夏天的几封信。在3月20日的两封书信之前的几期中,似乎都没有提到这一点,因此不知道这是什么原因。不管怎样,在接下来的几个月里,士兵们互相交换了几封信来宣传他们自己的部队。虽然约翰·布福德将军的骑兵显然是首先向起义军开火的,但大多数记者,就像我们下面的第一位记者一样,都不相信骑兵的说法,坚持认为战斗直到步兵交战才真正开始。第一封是威廉·霍夫曼写的,他曾任宾夕法尼亚第五步兵团上校
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信