{"title":"Annotating Places","authors":"Eric Lettkemann, Ingo Schulz-Schaeffer","doi":"10.4324/9781003036159-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increased use of web-enabled smartphones in urban public life is an important driver for merging physical space with digital information. Smartphone users access this information via a new form of apps referred to as locative media. In media studies, two opposing hypotheses exist as to how the use of locative media will transform public places. On the one hand, scholars express euphoric expectations that locative media will create socially inclusive places by sensitizing users to their environment and bringing strangers into conversation. On the other hand, the opponents demur that by personalizing spatial perception locative media will reinforce exclusion and push the decline of public life. In light of our empirical findings from a case study in Berlin, both hypotheses would appear to be exaggerations. Instead, we plead for a more detailed analysis of different forms of using locative media, revealing inclusive as well as exclusive implications. We illustrate our approach by analyzing two apps for annotating urban places: Foursquare City Guide and Swarm.","PeriodicalId":362353,"journal":{"name":"Spatial Transformations","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spatial Transformations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003036159-18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The increased use of web-enabled smartphones in urban public life is an important driver for merging physical space with digital information. Smartphone users access this information via a new form of apps referred to as locative media. In media studies, two opposing hypotheses exist as to how the use of locative media will transform public places. On the one hand, scholars express euphoric expectations that locative media will create socially inclusive places by sensitizing users to their environment and bringing strangers into conversation. On the other hand, the opponents demur that by personalizing spatial perception locative media will reinforce exclusion and push the decline of public life. In light of our empirical findings from a case study in Berlin, both hypotheses would appear to be exaggerations. Instead, we plead for a more detailed analysis of different forms of using locative media, revealing inclusive as well as exclusive implications. We illustrate our approach by analyzing two apps for annotating urban places: Foursquare City Guide and Swarm.
城市公共生活中越来越多地使用具有网络功能的智能手机,这是将物理空间与数字信息融合在一起的重要推动力。智能手机用户通过一种名为“定位媒体”的新型应用程序获取这些信息。在媒体研究中,关于使用位置媒体将如何改变公共场所存在两种相反的假设。一方面,学者们表达了乐观的期望,即位置媒体将通过使用户对环境敏感并将陌生人带入对话来创造具有社会包容性的场所。另一方面,反对者则认为,通过空间感知的个性化,位置媒体会强化排他性,推动公共生活的衰落。根据我们在柏林进行的一项案例研究的实证发现,这两种假设似乎都有些夸张。相反,我们呼吁对使用位置媒体的不同形式进行更详细的分析,揭示包容性和排他性的含义。我们通过分析两款标注城市地点的应用来说明我们的方法:Foursquare City Guide和Swarm。