A Comparative Analysis of Hold Out, Cross and Re-Substitution Validation in Hyper-Parameter Tuned Stochastic Short Term Load Forecasting

B. V. S. Vardhan, M. Khedkar, P. Thakre
{"title":"A Comparative Analysis of Hold Out, Cross and Re-Substitution Validation in Hyper-Parameter Tuned Stochastic Short Term Load Forecasting","authors":"B. V. S. Vardhan, M. Khedkar, P. Thakre","doi":"10.1109/NPSC57038.2022.10069288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Analysis of load plays an important role in the operation of modern power systems due to its highly intermittent nature. This manuscript proposes the best approach by comparing results of Hold out, Cross and Re-Substitution validation from hyperparameter tuned Short Term Load Forecasting (STLF). Tree, Neural Network and GPR (Gaussian Process Regression) are three stochastic regression methods used. Each validation procedure is compared with every considered regression method, leading to 9 such combinations. Each combination is analysed with statistical parameters like RMSE (Root Mean Square Error), R Squared, MSE(Mean Square Error), MAE (Mean Absolute Error) and training time. The best approach is further optimised by modifying hyper parameters using Bayesian, Grid Search, and Random Search and most suitable method is proposed. The simulations are performed in Python and MATLAB platforms. The best combination for computation of STLF is K-fold validation with Tree Regression The statistical parameters obtained from the combination are RMSE, R Squared, MSE, MAE and training time of 0.077, 0.88, 0.0059, 0.046, 1.2 respectively. The best method for hyper-parameter tuning is found out to be Grid search with a reduced MSE of 0.0023.","PeriodicalId":162808,"journal":{"name":"2022 22nd National Power Systems Conference (NPSC)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 22nd National Power Systems Conference (NPSC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NPSC57038.2022.10069288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Analysis of load plays an important role in the operation of modern power systems due to its highly intermittent nature. This manuscript proposes the best approach by comparing results of Hold out, Cross and Re-Substitution validation from hyperparameter tuned Short Term Load Forecasting (STLF). Tree, Neural Network and GPR (Gaussian Process Regression) are three stochastic regression methods used. Each validation procedure is compared with every considered regression method, leading to 9 such combinations. Each combination is analysed with statistical parameters like RMSE (Root Mean Square Error), R Squared, MSE(Mean Square Error), MAE (Mean Absolute Error) and training time. The best approach is further optimised by modifying hyper parameters using Bayesian, Grid Search, and Random Search and most suitable method is proposed. The simulations are performed in Python and MATLAB platforms. The best combination for computation of STLF is K-fold validation with Tree Regression The statistical parameters obtained from the combination are RMSE, R Squared, MSE, MAE and training time of 0.077, 0.88, 0.0059, 0.046, 1.2 respectively. The best method for hyper-parameter tuning is found out to be Grid search with a reduced MSE of 0.0023.
超参数调优随机短期负荷预测的保留、交叉和再替代验证比较分析
由于电力系统具有高度间歇性,负荷分析在现代电力系统的运行中起着重要的作用。本文通过比较超参数调优短期负荷预测(STLF)的Hold out、Cross和Re-Substitution验证结果,提出了最佳方法。树、神经网络和高斯过程回归是常用的三种随机回归方法。每个验证程序与每个考虑的回归方法进行比较,导致9个这样的组合。每个组合都用RMSE(均方根误差)、R平方、MSE(均方误差)、MAE(平均绝对误差)和训练时间等统计参数进行分析。利用贝叶斯、网格搜索和随机搜索等方法对超参数进行了优化,提出了最合适的方法。在Python和MATLAB平台上进行了仿真。计算STLF的最佳组合是用Tree Regression进行K-fold验证,组合得到的统计参数分别为RMSE、R Squared、MSE、MAE和训练时间,分别为0.077、0.88、0.0059、0.046、1.2。网格搜索是超参数调优的最佳方法,其MSE降低为0.0023。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信