Evaluating Tradeoffs for Swarm Reconnaissance with Autonomous Ground Vehicles

C. Goodin, Lucas Cagle, Greg Henley, Rhett Fereday, Justin Carrillo, Peilin Song, David P. McInnis
{"title":"Evaluating Tradeoffs for Swarm Reconnaissance with Autonomous Ground Vehicles","authors":"C. Goodin, Lucas Cagle, Greg Henley, Rhett Fereday, Justin Carrillo, Peilin Song, David P. McInnis","doi":"10.1115/1.4054581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Autonomous ground vehicles (AGV) operating collaboratively have several advantages over vehicles operating alone. An AGV team may be more resilient and efficient than a single AGV. Other advantages of AGV teams include increased coverage and multiple viewing angles of terrain features as well as resistance to failure from any single AGV. Additionally, AGV teams can explore large terrains more quickly and thoroughly than a single system. In this work, the feasibility of using a team of high-mobility AGV to explore a navigation corridor, map the terrain, and autonomously flag obstacles for future navigation is evaluated. Focusing on negative obstacles, the value of using multiple vehicles to map a navigation corridor is quantified. This study is the first to evaluate large teams of AGV collaborating in realistic off-road, 3D environments. The feasibility of the large-scale AGV team is demonstrated while avoiding the high cost of purchasing and testing large numbers of vehicles by using the MSU Autonomous Vehicle Simulator (MAVS), a high-fidelity, physics-based simulation tool. The cost and benefits of increasing the AGV team size are evaluated. The simulation results show how factors like fuel use, map coverage, and obstacle detection are influenced by increasing numbers of AGV in the team. The simulation architecture is presented and experiments quantifying the performance of the simulator are shown. Finally, a model for evaluating the tradeoff between mission effectiveness and fuel use is developed and presented to demonstrate the utility of this approach.","PeriodicalId":164923,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Autonomous Vehicles and Systems","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Autonomous Vehicles and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4054581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Autonomous ground vehicles (AGV) operating collaboratively have several advantages over vehicles operating alone. An AGV team may be more resilient and efficient than a single AGV. Other advantages of AGV teams include increased coverage and multiple viewing angles of terrain features as well as resistance to failure from any single AGV. Additionally, AGV teams can explore large terrains more quickly and thoroughly than a single system. In this work, the feasibility of using a team of high-mobility AGV to explore a navigation corridor, map the terrain, and autonomously flag obstacles for future navigation is evaluated. Focusing on negative obstacles, the value of using multiple vehicles to map a navigation corridor is quantified. This study is the first to evaluate large teams of AGV collaborating in realistic off-road, 3D environments. The feasibility of the large-scale AGV team is demonstrated while avoiding the high cost of purchasing and testing large numbers of vehicles by using the MSU Autonomous Vehicle Simulator (MAVS), a high-fidelity, physics-based simulation tool. The cost and benefits of increasing the AGV team size are evaluated. The simulation results show how factors like fuel use, map coverage, and obstacle detection are influenced by increasing numbers of AGV in the team. The simulation architecture is presented and experiments quantifying the performance of the simulator are shown. Finally, a model for evaluating the tradeoff between mission effectiveness and fuel use is developed and presented to demonstrate the utility of this approach.
利用自主地面车辆进行群侦察的权衡评估
与单独操作的车辆相比,协同操作的自动地面车辆(AGV)具有几个优势。AGV团队可能比单个AGV更具弹性和效率。AGV团队的其他优势包括增加覆盖范围和地形特征的多个视角,以及抵抗任何单一AGV的故障。此外,与单一系统相比,AGV团队可以更快、更彻底地探索大型地形。在这项工作中,评估了使用高机动性AGV团队探索导航走廊,绘制地形并自主标记障碍物以供未来导航的可行性。以负障碍物为重点,量化了多车绘制导航走廊的价值。这项研究首次评估了大型AGV团队在现实越野3D环境中的合作情况。通过使用MSU自动驾驶车辆模拟器(MAVS)(一种高保真的基于物理的仿真工具),证明了大规模AGV团队的可行性,同时避免了购买和测试大量车辆的高成本。评估了增加AGV团队规模的成本和收益。仿真结果显示了燃料使用、地图覆盖和障碍物检测等因素如何受到团队中AGV数量增加的影响。给出了仿真体系结构,并给出了量化仿真性能的实验。最后,开发了一个评估任务效率和燃料使用之间权衡的模型,并展示了该方法的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信