The Effect of English Admission Test and Various Variables on Foreign Language Skills of Students

Burak Asma, F. Saka
{"title":"The Effect of English Admission Test and Various Variables on Foreign Language Skills of Students","authors":"Burak Asma, F. Saka","doi":"10.30622/tarr.1188490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study compares students' foreign language proficiency according to several criteria and the role of the English Admission Test (EAT). The predictive correlational research design, one of the quantitative research methods, was used in this study. The study group consisted of 81 undergraduate students studying in the English Language Teaching Department of a state university in southern Turkey. The English Proficiency Test (TELP) developed by the researchers and the EAT scores were used as data collection tools. The validity and reliability analyses of the test were conducted using jMetrik, a data analysis software for classical test theory and item response theory, and the item difficulty and discrimination values, as well as the KR-21 reliability coefficients, were calculated. In line with the findings, it was concluded that the relevant test is a reliable and valid measurement tool. According to the findings, the English Admission Test scores predicted students' total TELP and reading test scores but not their listening, writing, or speaking scores. Besides, the students who received the English preparatory training performed better on the speaking and listening tests than those who did not. Finally, male students outperformed female students on both the total of English Proficiency Test and the reading test but not on other tests. In parallel with the results of the research, some suggestions were put forth. Accordingly, a test that successfully measures four basic language skills is needed in order to fully measure the target language skills of the students who will study in the field of language education. For this purpose, the content of the Foreign Language Test (YDT), which is currently in use, can be expanded to make multidimensional measurement and questions measuring different language skills can be added to the test. In order to facilitate the transition process and prepare the infrastructure, language skills can be added to the test gradually or multidimensional question types that measure more than one skill can be used.","PeriodicalId":318431,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Academic Research Review - Türk Akademik Araştırmalar Dergisi [TARR]","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Academic Research Review - Türk Akademik Araştırmalar Dergisi [TARR]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30622/tarr.1188490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study compares students' foreign language proficiency according to several criteria and the role of the English Admission Test (EAT). The predictive correlational research design, one of the quantitative research methods, was used in this study. The study group consisted of 81 undergraduate students studying in the English Language Teaching Department of a state university in southern Turkey. The English Proficiency Test (TELP) developed by the researchers and the EAT scores were used as data collection tools. The validity and reliability analyses of the test were conducted using jMetrik, a data analysis software for classical test theory and item response theory, and the item difficulty and discrimination values, as well as the KR-21 reliability coefficients, were calculated. In line with the findings, it was concluded that the relevant test is a reliable and valid measurement tool. According to the findings, the English Admission Test scores predicted students' total TELP and reading test scores but not their listening, writing, or speaking scores. Besides, the students who received the English preparatory training performed better on the speaking and listening tests than those who did not. Finally, male students outperformed female students on both the total of English Proficiency Test and the reading test but not on other tests. In parallel with the results of the research, some suggestions were put forth. Accordingly, a test that successfully measures four basic language skills is needed in order to fully measure the target language skills of the students who will study in the field of language education. For this purpose, the content of the Foreign Language Test (YDT), which is currently in use, can be expanded to make multidimensional measurement and questions measuring different language skills can be added to the test. In order to facilitate the transition process and prepare the infrastructure, language skills can be added to the test gradually or multidimensional question types that measure more than one skill can be used.
英语入学考试及各变量对学生外语技能的影响
本研究根据几个标准和英语入学考试(EAT)的作用来比较学生的外语能力。本研究采用定量研究方法之一的预测相关研究设计。研究小组由81名在土耳其南部一所州立大学英语教学系学习的本科生组成。使用研究者开发的英语水平测试(TELP)和英语水平测试分数作为数据收集工具。采用经典测试理论和项目反应理论数据分析软件jMetrik对测试进行效度和信度分析,计算项目难度值和辨别值,并计算r -21信度系数。根据研究结果,得出相关测试是一种可靠有效的测量工具。根据研究结果,英语入学考试成绩预测了学生的总TELP和阅读考试成绩,但不能预测他们的听力、写作和口语成绩。此外,接受过英语预备训练的学生在口语和听力测试中的表现优于未接受过英语预备训练的学生。最后,男生在英语水平测试和阅读测试的总分上表现优于女生,但在其他测试中表现不佳。结合研究结果,提出了几点建议。因此,要全面衡量未来语言教育领域学生的目标语言技能,就需要一个能够成功测量四种基本语言技能的测试。为此,可以对目前使用的外语考试(YDT)的内容进行扩展,进行多维度测量,并在考试中增加测量不同语言技能的题目。为了促进过渡过程和准备基础设施,可以逐步将语言技能添加到测试中,或者可以使用测量多种技能的多维问题类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信