National culture dimensions as predictors of innovation, creativity, and entrepreneurship

L. Jourdan, M. Smith
{"title":"National culture dimensions as predictors of innovation, creativity, and entrepreneurship","authors":"L. Jourdan, M. Smith","doi":"10.5038/2640-6489.6.2.1093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purposes of this study were twofold. The first was to encourage other investigators to examine more closely three indices related to economic growth, specifically innovation, entrepreneurship, and creativity. The second was to encourage further investigation of Hofstede’s national culture as explanatory variables. This investigation addressed this research gap by examining the relationships among indices of nations’ creativity, entrepreneurship, and innovation, and their relationships with Hofstede’s (2015) national culture dimensions. No previous research was identified which examined countries’ creativity, entrepreneurship, and innovation in the same study. The relationships among four measures associated with economic development—the Global Innovation Index (GII), the Global Entrepreneurship Index (GEI), the Global Creativity Index (GCI), and Bloomberg 50 most innovative countries (B50) were studied. Two rarely investigated indices (B50 and GCI) were included in this research. Results indicated that all four indices were highly correlated. The factor structure of Hofstede’s six cultural dimensions was reduced to three major factors: heteronomy-autonomy, gratification, and competition-altruism. Using multiple regression analysis, heteronomy-autonomy and gratification predicted GII. Gratification predicted the remaining three criteria. This study addressed this research gap of criterion development by examining the relationships among these variables, their relationships with national culture, and their predictability from different national culture dimensions. Practical implications of these findings for decision-makers and policymakers who want to increase their country’s economic growth through the support of creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship were discussed.","PeriodicalId":448415,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Business Insights","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Business Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5038/2640-6489.6.2.1093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The purposes of this study were twofold. The first was to encourage other investigators to examine more closely three indices related to economic growth, specifically innovation, entrepreneurship, and creativity. The second was to encourage further investigation of Hofstede’s national culture as explanatory variables. This investigation addressed this research gap by examining the relationships among indices of nations’ creativity, entrepreneurship, and innovation, and their relationships with Hofstede’s (2015) national culture dimensions. No previous research was identified which examined countries’ creativity, entrepreneurship, and innovation in the same study. The relationships among four measures associated with economic development—the Global Innovation Index (GII), the Global Entrepreneurship Index (GEI), the Global Creativity Index (GCI), and Bloomberg 50 most innovative countries (B50) were studied. Two rarely investigated indices (B50 and GCI) were included in this research. Results indicated that all four indices were highly correlated. The factor structure of Hofstede’s six cultural dimensions was reduced to three major factors: heteronomy-autonomy, gratification, and competition-altruism. Using multiple regression analysis, heteronomy-autonomy and gratification predicted GII. Gratification predicted the remaining three criteria. This study addressed this research gap of criterion development by examining the relationships among these variables, their relationships with national culture, and their predictability from different national culture dimensions. Practical implications of these findings for decision-makers and policymakers who want to increase their country’s economic growth through the support of creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship were discussed.
国家文化维度作为创新、创造力和企业家精神的预测因素
这项研究的目的是双重的。首先是鼓励其他研究者更密切地研究与经济增长有关的三个指标,特别是创新、创业和创造力。二是鼓励进一步研究Hofstede的民族文化作为解释变量。本研究通过考察国家创造力、企业家精神和创新指数之间的关系,以及它们与Hofstede(2015)国家文化维度的关系,解决了这一研究缺口。在此之前,还没有一项研究在同一项研究中考察了各国的创造力、企业家精神和创新能力。研究了与经济发展相关的四项指标——全球创新指数(GII)、全球创业指数(GEI)、全球创造力指数(GCI)和彭博50个最具创新力国家(B50)之间的关系。两个很少被研究的指标(B50和GCI)被纳入本研究。结果表明,四项指标均呈高度相关。Hofstede的六个文化维度的因素结构被简化为三个主要因素:他律-自治、满足和竞争-利他主义。运用多元回归分析,利用他律-自治和满足预测GII。满足预测了剩下的三个标准。本研究通过考察这些变量之间的关系、它们与民族文化的关系以及它们在不同民族文化维度上的可预测性,解决了标准制定的研究空白。本文还讨论了这些发现对那些希望通过支持创造、创新和创业来促进本国经济增长的决策者和政策制定者的实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信