{"title":"Marcus M. Garvey and Joseph A. Craigen","authors":"Ronald J. Stephens","doi":"10.5744/florida/9780813056210.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores the clash between global Garveyism and local Garveyism by investigating the practice of Garveyism on the ground. It does so by focusing on the work of Joseph Alexander Craigen, the executive secretary of the Detroit Chapter of the Universal Negro Improvement Association (UNIA) and a leading UNIA official, who maintained a professional relationship with Marcus Garvey from 1919 to 1931, but who was sometimes in disagreement with Garvey’s down- to-earth leadership and management style. It also examines Craigen’s split with Garvey in 1929, and follows Craigen’s career beyond his formal association with the UNIA, both in Detroit and in Idlewild, Michigan. This chapter enables scholars to better understand how the practical operation of the UNIA—despite Garvey’s efforts to establish a clear chain of command—encouraged the creation of local centers of power. By charting Craigen’s post-UNIA career, it also demonstrates the manner in which the mass movement sustained by the UNIA in the United States during the 1920s continued to reverberate in the activities of talented men and women like Craigen who gained a political education in the organization.","PeriodicalId":416937,"journal":{"name":"Global Garveyism","volume":"251 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Garveyism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5744/florida/9780813056210.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This chapter explores the clash between global Garveyism and local Garveyism by investigating the practice of Garveyism on the ground. It does so by focusing on the work of Joseph Alexander Craigen, the executive secretary of the Detroit Chapter of the Universal Negro Improvement Association (UNIA) and a leading UNIA official, who maintained a professional relationship with Marcus Garvey from 1919 to 1931, but who was sometimes in disagreement with Garvey’s down- to-earth leadership and management style. It also examines Craigen’s split with Garvey in 1929, and follows Craigen’s career beyond his formal association with the UNIA, both in Detroit and in Idlewild, Michigan. This chapter enables scholars to better understand how the practical operation of the UNIA—despite Garvey’s efforts to establish a clear chain of command—encouraged the creation of local centers of power. By charting Craigen’s post-UNIA career, it also demonstrates the manner in which the mass movement sustained by the UNIA in the United States during the 1920s continued to reverberate in the activities of talented men and women like Craigen who gained a political education in the organization.
本章通过实地考察Garveyism的实践,探讨了全球Garveyism和地方Garveyism之间的冲突。该书通过关注约瑟夫·亚历山大·克雷根(Joseph Alexander Craigen)的工作来做到这一点,他是全球黑人改善协会(UNIA)底特律分会的执行秘书,也是UNIA的主要官员,他在1919年至1931年期间与马库斯·加维(Marcus Garvey)保持着专业关系,但有时与加维的务实领导和管理风格存在分歧。它还考察了克雷根在1929年与加维的分裂,并跟随克雷根在底特律和密歇根州爱德怀尔德与美国大学协会正式合作之后的职业生涯。这一章使学者们能够更好地理解联合国的实际运作——尽管加维努力建立一个明确的指挥链——是如何鼓励地方权力中心的建立的。通过描绘克雷根在UNIA之后的职业生涯,它也展示了在20世纪20年代,美国UNIA所支持的群众运动如何继续在克雷根这样的有才华的人的活动中产生反响,他们在这个组织中接受了政治教育。