Computer Simulations Outcomes of Left Atrial Arrhythmia Induction are Highly Sensitive to Scar and Fibrosis Determination

M. Lange, Eugene Kwan, R. MacLeod, R. Ranjan
{"title":"Computer Simulations Outcomes of Left Atrial Arrhythmia Induction are Highly Sensitive to Scar and Fibrosis Determination","authors":"M. Lange, Eugene Kwan, R. MacLeod, R. Ranjan","doi":"10.23919/cinc53138.2021.9662818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Personalized computational models used to guide ablation heavily depend on late gadolinium enhanced images for scar and gray area estimation. The estimation has a high degree of uncertainty, but it is unclear how sensitive the simulation outcome is to the specific scar. In this work, we study the sensitivity of the simulation outcome on the scar. Two personalized left atrial models were generated for a de-novo and a redo atrial. In control setting scar and gray area were obtained by thresholding LGE-MRI images at 70%, and 60% of the maximum myocardial intensity, respectively. This was compared against segmentations, generated by dilating, or eroding the control segmentation by one pixel, and increasing or decreasing the threshold by 5%. The outcomes were normal capture without further activity, extra beats with additional activity but not sustained, sustained arrhythmia with activity until the end of the simulation, and no capture. We found normally captured beats were not affected in redo cases but did change in de-novo ablation. However, extra beats were likely to change to arrhythmia when adding or subtracting scar. Sustained arrhythmia was sensitive to a reduction in scar size. This reiterates that attention is need when determining appropriate thresholds for scar and gray area.","PeriodicalId":126746,"journal":{"name":"2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/cinc53138.2021.9662818","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Personalized computational models used to guide ablation heavily depend on late gadolinium enhanced images for scar and gray area estimation. The estimation has a high degree of uncertainty, but it is unclear how sensitive the simulation outcome is to the specific scar. In this work, we study the sensitivity of the simulation outcome on the scar. Two personalized left atrial models were generated for a de-novo and a redo atrial. In control setting scar and gray area were obtained by thresholding LGE-MRI images at 70%, and 60% of the maximum myocardial intensity, respectively. This was compared against segmentations, generated by dilating, or eroding the control segmentation by one pixel, and increasing or decreasing the threshold by 5%. The outcomes were normal capture without further activity, extra beats with additional activity but not sustained, sustained arrhythmia with activity until the end of the simulation, and no capture. We found normally captured beats were not affected in redo cases but did change in de-novo ablation. However, extra beats were likely to change to arrhythmia when adding or subtracting scar. Sustained arrhythmia was sensitive to a reduction in scar size. This reiterates that attention is need when determining appropriate thresholds for scar and gray area.
诱导左房心律失常的计算机模拟结果对疤痕和纤维化的测定高度敏感
用于指导消融的个性化计算模型在很大程度上依赖于晚期钆增强图像的疤痕和灰色区域估计。该估计具有高度的不确定性,但尚不清楚模拟结果对特定疤痕的敏感程度。在这项工作中,我们研究了模拟结果对疤痕的敏感性。生成了两个个性化左心房模型,分别用于重建左心房和重建左心房。在对照组中,疤痕和灰色区域分别在最大心肌强度的70%和60%处进行阈值分割。这与通过将控制分割扩大或侵蚀一个像素,并将阈值增加或减少5%而产生的分割进行比较。结果是正常捕获,没有进一步的活动,额外的心跳,额外的活动,但不持续,持续的心律失常,活动,直到模拟结束,没有捕获。我们发现正常捕获的心跳在重做病例中不受影响,但在从头消融中确实发生了变化。然而,当增加或减少疤痕时,额外的心跳可能转变为心律失常。持续性心律失常对瘢痕大小的减小很敏感。这重申了在确定疤痕和灰色区域的适当阈值时需要注意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信