PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA YANG DIAJARKAN DENGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE DAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KONVENSIONAL

Nilam Wally, J. Molle, C. Laamena
{"title":"PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA YANG DIAJARKAN DENGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE DAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KONVENSIONAL","authors":"Nilam Wally, J. Molle, C. Laamena","doi":"10.30598/jupitekvol3iss1pp39-44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research is motivated by student mathematics learning outcomes on the material two-dimentional figure still low. The learning process is still teacher-centered and there is a lack of good cooperation between students in discussions when the learning process takes place. This research is an experimental study that aims to determine whether there are differences in student learning outcomes taught by cooperative models Think Pair share and learning models The conventional research design used is Nonrandomized Control Group Posttest Design. The population in this study were all eighth grade students of Ambon-Wathan High School with 100 students and the sample in this study was 40 students, selected using purposive sampling. The instrument used in this study was in the form of test questions which consisted of question details for the final test. The analysis used is statistical analysis, which is t-test. Calculation results obtained, namely the value of Sig. (2-tailed) < α or 0.026 <0.05 which causes H0 to be rejected and H1 to be accepted. Based on the accepted hypothesis, the results of the study showed that there were differences in the learning outcomes of the experimental class and control class students who were taught with the Cooperative learning model of the Think Pair share type and the conventional learning model on the Material of Blocks and Beams","PeriodicalId":367306,"journal":{"name":"JUPITEK: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JUPITEK: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30598/jupitekvol3iss1pp39-44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This research is motivated by student mathematics learning outcomes on the material two-dimentional figure still low. The learning process is still teacher-centered and there is a lack of good cooperation between students in discussions when the learning process takes place. This research is an experimental study that aims to determine whether there are differences in student learning outcomes taught by cooperative models Think Pair share and learning models The conventional research design used is Nonrandomized Control Group Posttest Design. The population in this study were all eighth grade students of Ambon-Wathan High School with 100 students and the sample in this study was 40 students, selected using purposive sampling. The instrument used in this study was in the form of test questions which consisted of question details for the final test. The analysis used is statistical analysis, which is t-test. Calculation results obtained, namely the value of Sig. (2-tailed) < α or 0.026 <0.05 which causes H0 to be rejected and H1 to be accepted. Based on the accepted hypothesis, the results of the study showed that there were differences in the learning outcomes of the experimental class and control class students who were taught with the Cooperative learning model of the Think Pair share type and the conventional learning model on the Material of Blocks and Beams
学生的学习成绩与合作的思维配对模式和传统的学习模式不同
本研究的动机是学生对材料二维图形的学习成果仍然较低。学习过程仍然以教师为中心,在学习过程中,学生之间在讨论中缺乏良好的合作。本研究是一项实验研究,旨在确定合作模式、思维对共享模式和学习模式对学生学习成果的影响是否存在差异。本研究的总体为Ambon-Wathan高中的八年级学生,共100名学生,本研究的样本为40名学生,采用有目的抽样的方法选择。本研究使用的工具是测试问题的形式,包括最终测试的问题细节。使用的分析是统计分析,也就是t检验。得到计算结果,即Sig. (2-tailed) < α或0.026 <0.05,导致H0被拒绝,H1被接受。基于公认的假设,研究结果表明,采用思维对共享型合作学习模式和传统学习模式的实验班和控制班学生在砌块和梁的材料上的学习效果存在差异
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信