Group-Sovereignty Conflict

Levy O’Flynn.
{"title":"Group-Sovereignty Conflict","authors":"Levy O’Flynn.","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198867036.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores conflicts that centre on group sovereignty. In such conflicts, two or more identity-based groups compete for political dominion within a specific territory. We introduce group sovereignty in broad terms as a concept in political and constitutional theory. We also offer some initial suggestions for the design of a deliberative peace referendum to take account of group sovereignty elements in conflict. We contend that this element cannot be ignored or wished away, but must be accommodated—for instance, by means of a rule of ‘concurrent consent’ in the referendum. Such a rule requires a majority vote within each of the distinct groups in conflict. A critical question raised, however, is the degree to which deliberation is feasible when we give group identity (the root cause of many deliberative pathologies) a robust role in the deliberative peace referendum.","PeriodicalId":103014,"journal":{"name":"Deliberative Peace Referendums","volume":"194 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deliberative Peace Referendums","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198867036.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter explores conflicts that centre on group sovereignty. In such conflicts, two or more identity-based groups compete for political dominion within a specific territory. We introduce group sovereignty in broad terms as a concept in political and constitutional theory. We also offer some initial suggestions for the design of a deliberative peace referendum to take account of group sovereignty elements in conflict. We contend that this element cannot be ignored or wished away, but must be accommodated—for instance, by means of a rule of ‘concurrent consent’ in the referendum. Such a rule requires a majority vote within each of the distinct groups in conflict. A critical question raised, however, is the degree to which deliberation is feasible when we give group identity (the root cause of many deliberative pathologies) a robust role in the deliberative peace referendum.
Group-Sovereignty冲突
本章探讨了以群体主权为中心的冲突。在这种冲突中,两个或更多基于身份的群体在特定领土内争夺政治统治权。我们在政治和宪法理论中广泛地介绍了群体主权这个概念。我们还提出一些初步建议,以便设计一个考虑到冲突中的集团主权因素的审议性和平公民投票。我们认为,不能忽视或希望消除这一因素,而必须加以适应- -例如,在全民投票中采用“同时同意”的规则。这样的规则要求在每个冲突的不同群体中进行多数投票。然而,提出的一个关键问题是,当我们在审议性和平公投中赋予群体认同(许多审议病态的根本原因)一个强有力的角色时,审议的可行性程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信