Splitting the Difference: Freud's Disavowed Theory of Antisemitism

J. Geller
{"title":"Splitting the Difference: Freud's Disavowed Theory of Antisemitism","authors":"J. Geller","doi":"10.2979/antistud.4.2.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Sigmund Freud undertook his most significant discussion of the different sources of antisemitism in the first part of the final essay of his last completed work, Moses and Monotheism (1939). After analyzing what Freud does and does not say about antisemitism in Moses, this article turns back to his discussion of neurotic development with its new theorization of defense against trauma in terms of disavowal and splitting of the ego (rather than in terms of repression and deferred action). There it locates the fetishistic remains of another theory of antisemitism that, in the face of its implication of the possible onset of collective psychosis—against which his psychoanalysis would be defenseless—and consequent genocidal telos, Freud may have traumatically disavowed.","PeriodicalId":148002,"journal":{"name":"Antisemitism Studies","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antisemitism Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/antistud.4.2.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:Sigmund Freud undertook his most significant discussion of the different sources of antisemitism in the first part of the final essay of his last completed work, Moses and Monotheism (1939). After analyzing what Freud does and does not say about antisemitism in Moses, this article turns back to his discussion of neurotic development with its new theorization of defense against trauma in terms of disavowal and splitting of the ego (rather than in terms of repression and deferred action). There it locates the fetishistic remains of another theory of antisemitism that, in the face of its implication of the possible onset of collective psychosis—against which his psychoanalysis would be defenseless—and consequent genocidal telos, Freud may have traumatically disavowed.
分裂差异:弗洛伊德否定的反犹主义理论
摘要:西格蒙德·弗洛伊德在他最后一部完成的著作《摩西与一神论》(1939)的最后一篇文章的第一部分中对反犹主义的不同来源进行了最重要的讨论。在分析了弗洛伊德对《摩西》中的反犹主义说了什么和没有说什么之后,本文回到他对神经症发展的讨论,以及从自我的否定和分裂(而不是从压抑和延迟行动的角度)的角度来防御创伤的新理论。在那里,它找到了另一种反犹主义理论的恋物残余,面对其可能的集体精神病发作的暗示——他的精神分析将是毫无防御能力的——以及随之而来的种族灭绝目的,弗洛伊德可能已经在创伤中否认了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信