Rien que ton costume, on te met à la porte: The Importance of Being Fashionable in 19th century French Literature

S. Godfrey
{"title":"Rien que ton costume, on te met à la porte: The Importance of Being Fashionable in 19th century French Literature","authors":"S. Godfrey","doi":"10.1080/1535685X.1995.11015774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a keen awareness in 19th century French literature that fashion can open many doors. In a society freed from the sumptuary laws that, in principle, had governed public appearance since the 16th century, unconditional access to all modes of dress allowed 19th century authors and their fictive counterparts to aspire towards social spheres whose doors a few decades before might have been locked. Deslauriers' advice to Frederic Moreau at the beginning of L'Education Sentimentale based on the authority of Rastignac summarizes a new formula for social ambition: Puisque tu as un habit noir et des gants blancs, profites-en!' Under the ancien regime, strict edicts regarding acceptable dress had produced a reliable code for maintaining and reading the status of individuals and their place within the social hierarchy. As stated in the Edict of 1514, all common people and non-nobles were prohibited from assuming le titre de noblesse soit en leurs qualitis ou en habillement.2 Other edicts specified fabrics and adornments forbidden to the bourgeoisie: damask, velvet, taffeta, satin, flesh-coloured hose, valuable jewels, and so on. In short, a series of sumptuary laws helped to ensure social immobility especially in popular and rural milieus and assured the correspondence between costume and social position. In the words of Daniel Roche, la mode devientprincipe de lecture sociale et morale sans qu'ily ait rupture entre le vestimentaire et la condition entiere de l'homme.3 For citizens of the 19th century, the Revolutionary repeal of the sumptuary laws in 1794 thus represented the final liberation from a classbased dress code and consequently, a democratization of dress. At the same time, it also dismantled a relatively stable system of signification that had been constructed around difference and dress. By the second decade of the century, men's clothing in particular had","PeriodicalId":312913,"journal":{"name":"Cardozo Studies in Law and Literature","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardozo Studies in Law and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1535685X.1995.11015774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There is a keen awareness in 19th century French literature that fashion can open many doors. In a society freed from the sumptuary laws that, in principle, had governed public appearance since the 16th century, unconditional access to all modes of dress allowed 19th century authors and their fictive counterparts to aspire towards social spheres whose doors a few decades before might have been locked. Deslauriers' advice to Frederic Moreau at the beginning of L'Education Sentimentale based on the authority of Rastignac summarizes a new formula for social ambition: Puisque tu as un habit noir et des gants blancs, profites-en!' Under the ancien regime, strict edicts regarding acceptable dress had produced a reliable code for maintaining and reading the status of individuals and their place within the social hierarchy. As stated in the Edict of 1514, all common people and non-nobles were prohibited from assuming le titre de noblesse soit en leurs qualitis ou en habillement.2 Other edicts specified fabrics and adornments forbidden to the bourgeoisie: damask, velvet, taffeta, satin, flesh-coloured hose, valuable jewels, and so on. In short, a series of sumptuary laws helped to ensure social immobility especially in popular and rural milieus and assured the correspondence between costume and social position. In the words of Daniel Roche, la mode devientprincipe de lecture sociale et morale sans qu'ily ait rupture entre le vestimentaire et la condition entiere de l'homme.3 For citizens of the 19th century, the Revolutionary repeal of the sumptuary laws in 1794 thus represented the final liberation from a classbased dress code and consequently, a democratization of dress. At the same time, it also dismantled a relatively stable system of signification that had been constructed around difference and dress. By the second decade of the century, men's clothing in particular had
Rien que ton costume, on The met la porte:时尚在19世纪法国文学中的重要性
19世纪的法国文学敏锐地意识到,时尚可以打开许多扇门。从原则上讲,自16世纪以来,奢侈的法律一直制约着公众的形象,在这个社会中,人们可以无条件地穿着各种服装,这使得19世纪的作家和他们的小说同行能够渴望进入社会领域,而这些领域的大门在几十年前可能是紧闭的。在《感怀教育》一书的开头,德斯劳里耶以拉斯蒂涅的权威为基础,对弗雷德里克·莫罗提出了一个关于社会野心的新公式:“不习惯的黑,利润的黑!”在古代制度下,关于可接受的服装的严格法令产生了一种可靠的代码,用于维护和解读个人的地位及其在社会等级中的地位。1514年敕令规定,禁止所有平民和非贵族担任le titre de noblesse soit en leurs qualtis ou en habillement其他法令规定了资产阶级禁止使用的织物和装饰品:锦缎、天鹅绒、塔夫绸、缎子、肉色长筒袜、贵重珠宝等等。简而言之,一系列关于奢侈品的法律有助于确保社会不流动,特别是在流行和农村环境中,并确保服装与社会地位之间的对应。用丹尼尔·罗奇的话来说,“社会训导的不正当原则与道德的不正当原则”就是“社会训导的不正当原则与道德的不正当原则”因此,对于19世纪的公民来说,1794年废除奢侈品法的革命代表着从基于阶级的着装规范中最终解放出来,从而实现了着装的民主化。与此同时,它也拆除了围绕差异和服饰构建的相对稳定的意义体系。到了20世纪的第二个十年,男士服装的变化尤为明显
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信