Shock Synthesis of Gd2Zr2O7

T. Sekine, Q. Zhou, P. Chen, Z. Tan, H. Ran, J. Liu
{"title":"Shock Synthesis of Gd2Zr2O7","authors":"T. Sekine, Q. Zhou, P. Chen, Z. Tan, H. Ran, J. Liu","doi":"10.21741/9781644900338-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We dealt with shock compression on a composition of Gd2Zr2O7 by explosive-driven flyer impact methods, because Gd2Zr2O7 with rGd/rZr ration of 1.46 lies at the structural boundary between ordered pyrochlore and defect fluorite structures. The results indicate recovered products depend on shock conditions that we need to specify by further study. Introduction Shock compression process provides unique environments for materials synthesis due to not only the realized high pressure and high temperature but also the shock-enhanced kinetics and fast quenching [1]. The process is a time-limited reaction and favors martensitic phase transformation in general. There are many trials to use shock compression techniques for investigation of solid state reactions [2]. The most typical one has been known historically as diamond synthesis, and the process has been developed to optimize the yield of products. Here we report a progress of shock synthesis of oxide compounds using explosive-driven plate impacts. Rare earth pyrochlore compounds of A2B2O7, where A is a rare earth element and B is a tetravalent cation such as Zr and Ti, exhibit several interesting properties for physical, chemical and industrial applications. The pyrochlore structure is known to form if the cation radii ratio (rA/rB) lies in the range 1.46–1.80. However, the fluorite structure is favored with rA/rB below 1.46. The cation radii ratio rA/rB has an important effect on the high pressure structural stability. Gd2Zr2O7 with rA/rB ratio of 1.46 lies at the structural boundary between ordered pyrochlore and defect fluorite. Hence it is expected to show interesting structural behavior as a function of temperature and pressure. We tried to understand the effect of shock compression on Gd2Zr2O7. Among A2B2X7 (X is anion such as O and F) compounds there are three discrete structures of pyroclore, fluorite, and weberite. Their structural relations are based on the fluorite structure (AX2) where each anion is at the center of the cation tetrahedral (A4X) and the lattice is characterized by a lattice constant of a = ~5 Å with Z=1. In pyrochlore structure, different A and B cations make A4X, B4X, and A2B2X, and the lattice is expanded double (a = ~10 Å) and the number of Z=8. Weberite consists of A3BX, AB3X, and A2B2X, with lattice constants of √2a, 2a, and √2a and with Z=4. Therefore, pyrochlore and weberite have their corresponding superlattices in addition to the fluorite structure. Shock compression technique has never been applied to solid-solid reactions in complicate chemical systems to our knowledge. We explore such chemical systems using shock compression techniques. Explosion Shock Waves and High Strain Rate Phenomena Materials Research Forum LLC Materials Research Proceedings 13 (2019) 31-34 https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644900338-5 32 Experimental methods We dealt shock compression on two starting mixtures of a composition Gd2Zr2O7 (powdered mixture of Gd2O3 + 2 ZrO2 and the product heated in air at 900 C for 2 hours), encapsulated in copper containers, by explosive-driven flyer impact methods [3]. A copper flyer with a diameter of 40 mm and a thickness of 2 mm is accelerated to a high velocity by the detonation of the main explosive charge of nitromethane (CH3NO2), initiated by a booster charge of 8701 explosive [3]. Peak shock pressure reflected within a sample is calculated by the impedance match method from the known impact velocity. The shock velocity (Us km/s)particle velocity (Up km/s) relation of copper [4] with density of 8.924 g/cm) is used as Us = 3.91 + 1.51Up. The starting material preheated at 900 C (sample I) was partially reacted to a fluorite structure with monoclinic ZrO2 according to the powder x-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis (Fig. 1 A, B, and C). Another starting material (sample II) was a mixture of Gd2O3 and monoclinic ZrO2 as the received powders. The container after shot was cut open to remove the sample. The successfully recovered samples as well as the starting materials were investigated by powder x-ray diffraction methods to identify phases present in products. We carried out a series of recovery experiments as a function of impact velocity and porosity. Explosion Shock Waves and High Strain Rate Phenomena Materials Research Forum LLC Materials Research Proceedings 13 (2019) 31-34 https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644900338-5 33 Results and discussion We have started a series of shock recovery experiments on various pyrocholre compounds that has not known yet, and explore novel compounds using shock compression. We report and discuss the results on two bulk compositions of Gd2Zr2O7. Impact velocities of 1.85 km/s, 2/36 km/s, and 3.06 km/s of Cu flyers correspond to peak shock pressures of 43.5 GPa, 60.0 GPa, and 84.9 GPa, respectively. The XRD patterns of recovered samples indicate completely transformed to the fluorite structure with no additional peaks (Fig. 1 F) from sample I. The peaks sharpen with increasing shock pressure (Figs. 1 D and E). The starting sample (Fig. 1 C) indicates peaks corresponding to a fluoride structure and Gd2O3 with no ZrO2. Although this result suggests that the fluorite is non-stoichiometric, the initial monoclinic ZrO2 may be transformed to cubic or tetragonal structure at shock-induced high temperatures. The maximum peaks for fluorite and tetragonal (or cubic) ZrO2 are close around 30 degree each other, and the difference between tetragonal and cubic ZrO2 is indistinguishable by XRD [5]. The products from the raw powder mixture (sample II), however, display two types of XRD patterns (Fig. 2). One consists of relatively broad peaks corresponding to a pyrochlore structure (Figs. 2 C and E) and the other indicate relatively sharp peaks of pyrochlore structure (Fig. D), although both contain significant amounts of copper powders from container and may contain small amount of tetragonal (or cubic) ZrO2. The copper contamination that we did not observed in sample I may suggest higher shock temperatures in sample II than sample I because the starting Gd2O3 powder was poorly crystalline (Fig. 2 A). Then, the presence of a large amount of copper in the recovered sample II can be explained by high temperatures, although the porosity difference may affect the shock temperature. The formation of fluorite Gd2Zr2O7 suggests relatively high temperatures (>1530C) in hot press sintering [6]. If this is the case, our shock temperatures could be close to this. The effects of porosity of the initial powders pressed in the recovery container are not well controlled in the present study, and we need further study. However, high temperatures generated in powdered samples are found to promote solid reaction significantly. It is difficult to understand the shock pressure effect on the solid reaction due to a small difference between fluorite and pyrochlore structures at high pressures. Based on a detailed study of the lattice parameter of Gd2Zr2O7 with fluorite and pyrochlore structures at ambient condition [7], the pyrochlore has slightly larger volume than the fluorite and can be the low pressure. Therefore, we need to know shock conditions to understand the solid reactions. And also it is interesting to compare the static compression results on Gd2Zr2O7 at room temperature [8, 9]. The results indicate back transformation from pyrochlore to defect-fluorite formed above 15 GPa [8] and amorphization above ~35 GPa due to distortion of cation [9]. Summary Shock compressions of powders with a composition of Gd2Zr2O7 produced both defect fluorite and ordered pyrochlore structures detected by x-ray diffraction methods. The results need to be specified to understand the solid reactions.","PeriodicalId":415881,"journal":{"name":"Explosion Shock Waves and High Strain Rate Phenomena","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Explosion Shock Waves and High Strain Rate Phenomena","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644900338-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We dealt with shock compression on a composition of Gd2Zr2O7 by explosive-driven flyer impact methods, because Gd2Zr2O7 with rGd/rZr ration of 1.46 lies at the structural boundary between ordered pyrochlore and defect fluorite structures. The results indicate recovered products depend on shock conditions that we need to specify by further study. Introduction Shock compression process provides unique environments for materials synthesis due to not only the realized high pressure and high temperature but also the shock-enhanced kinetics and fast quenching [1]. The process is a time-limited reaction and favors martensitic phase transformation in general. There are many trials to use shock compression techniques for investigation of solid state reactions [2]. The most typical one has been known historically as diamond synthesis, and the process has been developed to optimize the yield of products. Here we report a progress of shock synthesis of oxide compounds using explosive-driven plate impacts. Rare earth pyrochlore compounds of A2B2O7, where A is a rare earth element and B is a tetravalent cation such as Zr and Ti, exhibit several interesting properties for physical, chemical and industrial applications. The pyrochlore structure is known to form if the cation radii ratio (rA/rB) lies in the range 1.46–1.80. However, the fluorite structure is favored with rA/rB below 1.46. The cation radii ratio rA/rB has an important effect on the high pressure structural stability. Gd2Zr2O7 with rA/rB ratio of 1.46 lies at the structural boundary between ordered pyrochlore and defect fluorite. Hence it is expected to show interesting structural behavior as a function of temperature and pressure. We tried to understand the effect of shock compression on Gd2Zr2O7. Among A2B2X7 (X is anion such as O and F) compounds there are three discrete structures of pyroclore, fluorite, and weberite. Their structural relations are based on the fluorite structure (AX2) where each anion is at the center of the cation tetrahedral (A4X) and the lattice is characterized by a lattice constant of a = ~5 Å with Z=1. In pyrochlore structure, different A and B cations make A4X, B4X, and A2B2X, and the lattice is expanded double (a = ~10 Å) and the number of Z=8. Weberite consists of A3BX, AB3X, and A2B2X, with lattice constants of √2a, 2a, and √2a and with Z=4. Therefore, pyrochlore and weberite have their corresponding superlattices in addition to the fluorite structure. Shock compression technique has never been applied to solid-solid reactions in complicate chemical systems to our knowledge. We explore such chemical systems using shock compression techniques. Explosion Shock Waves and High Strain Rate Phenomena Materials Research Forum LLC Materials Research Proceedings 13 (2019) 31-34 https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644900338-5 32 Experimental methods We dealt shock compression on two starting mixtures of a composition Gd2Zr2O7 (powdered mixture of Gd2O3 + 2 ZrO2 and the product heated in air at 900 C for 2 hours), encapsulated in copper containers, by explosive-driven flyer impact methods [3]. A copper flyer with a diameter of 40 mm and a thickness of 2 mm is accelerated to a high velocity by the detonation of the main explosive charge of nitromethane (CH3NO2), initiated by a booster charge of 8701 explosive [3]. Peak shock pressure reflected within a sample is calculated by the impedance match method from the known impact velocity. The shock velocity (Us km/s)particle velocity (Up km/s) relation of copper [4] with density of 8.924 g/cm) is used as Us = 3.91 + 1.51Up. The starting material preheated at 900 C (sample I) was partially reacted to a fluorite structure with monoclinic ZrO2 according to the powder x-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis (Fig. 1 A, B, and C). Another starting material (sample II) was a mixture of Gd2O3 and monoclinic ZrO2 as the received powders. The container after shot was cut open to remove the sample. The successfully recovered samples as well as the starting materials were investigated by powder x-ray diffraction methods to identify phases present in products. We carried out a series of recovery experiments as a function of impact velocity and porosity. Explosion Shock Waves and High Strain Rate Phenomena Materials Research Forum LLC Materials Research Proceedings 13 (2019) 31-34 https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644900338-5 33 Results and discussion We have started a series of shock recovery experiments on various pyrocholre compounds that has not known yet, and explore novel compounds using shock compression. We report and discuss the results on two bulk compositions of Gd2Zr2O7. Impact velocities of 1.85 km/s, 2/36 km/s, and 3.06 km/s of Cu flyers correspond to peak shock pressures of 43.5 GPa, 60.0 GPa, and 84.9 GPa, respectively. The XRD patterns of recovered samples indicate completely transformed to the fluorite structure with no additional peaks (Fig. 1 F) from sample I. The peaks sharpen with increasing shock pressure (Figs. 1 D and E). The starting sample (Fig. 1 C) indicates peaks corresponding to a fluoride structure and Gd2O3 with no ZrO2. Although this result suggests that the fluorite is non-stoichiometric, the initial monoclinic ZrO2 may be transformed to cubic or tetragonal structure at shock-induced high temperatures. The maximum peaks for fluorite and tetragonal (or cubic) ZrO2 are close around 30 degree each other, and the difference between tetragonal and cubic ZrO2 is indistinguishable by XRD [5]. The products from the raw powder mixture (sample II), however, display two types of XRD patterns (Fig. 2). One consists of relatively broad peaks corresponding to a pyrochlore structure (Figs. 2 C and E) and the other indicate relatively sharp peaks of pyrochlore structure (Fig. D), although both contain significant amounts of copper powders from container and may contain small amount of tetragonal (or cubic) ZrO2. The copper contamination that we did not observed in sample I may suggest higher shock temperatures in sample II than sample I because the starting Gd2O3 powder was poorly crystalline (Fig. 2 A). Then, the presence of a large amount of copper in the recovered sample II can be explained by high temperatures, although the porosity difference may affect the shock temperature. The formation of fluorite Gd2Zr2O7 suggests relatively high temperatures (>1530C) in hot press sintering [6]. If this is the case, our shock temperatures could be close to this. The effects of porosity of the initial powders pressed in the recovery container are not well controlled in the present study, and we need further study. However, high temperatures generated in powdered samples are found to promote solid reaction significantly. It is difficult to understand the shock pressure effect on the solid reaction due to a small difference between fluorite and pyrochlore structures at high pressures. Based on a detailed study of the lattice parameter of Gd2Zr2O7 with fluorite and pyrochlore structures at ambient condition [7], the pyrochlore has slightly larger volume than the fluorite and can be the low pressure. Therefore, we need to know shock conditions to understand the solid reactions. And also it is interesting to compare the static compression results on Gd2Zr2O7 at room temperature [8, 9]. The results indicate back transformation from pyrochlore to defect-fluorite formed above 15 GPa [8] and amorphization above ~35 GPa due to distortion of cation [9]. Summary Shock compressions of powders with a composition of Gd2Zr2O7 produced both defect fluorite and ordered pyrochlore structures detected by x-ray diffraction methods. The results need to be specified to understand the solid reactions.
Gd2Zr2O7的冲击合成
由于Gd2Zr2O7的rGd/rZr比值为1.46,处于有序焦绿石和缺陷萤石结构的边界,我们采用爆炸驱动飞片冲击法对其进行了冲击压缩。结果表明,回收产物取决于冲击条件,需要进一步研究。冲击压缩工艺不仅实现了高压和高温,而且冲击增强动力学和快速淬火,为材料合成提供了独特的环境[1]。该过程是一个时效反应,一般有利于马氏体相变。有许多试验使用激波压缩技术来研究固态反应[2]。历史上最典型的一种方法是金刚石合成,该方法的发展是为了优化产品的收率。本文报道了利用爆炸驱动板冲击合成氧化物的研究进展。A2B2O7的稀土焦绿盐化合物,其中A是稀土元素,B是四价阳离子,如Zr和Ti,在物理,化学和工业应用中表现出一些有趣的性质。当阳离子半径比(rA/rB)在1.46 ~ 1.80之间时,可形成焦绿石结构。rA/rB低于1.46时,有利于萤石结构的形成。阳离子半径比rA/rB对高压结构稳定性有重要影响。Gd2Zr2O7位于有序焦绿石和缺陷萤石的结构边界,rA/rB比值为1.46。因此,它有望表现出有趣的结构行为,作为温度和压力的函数。我们试图了解冲击压缩对Gd2Zr2O7的影响。在A2B2X7 (X为阴离子,如O和F)化合物中有三种分立结构:辉石、萤石和韦伯石。它们的结构关系基于萤石结构(AX2),其中每个阴离子位于阳离子四面体(A4X)的中心,晶格的特征是晶格常数为a = ~5 Å, Z=1。在焦绿石结构中,不同的A和B阳离子形成A4X、B4X和A2B2X,晶格扩展为双晶格(A = ~10 Å), Z=8。Weberite由A3BX、AB3X和A2B2X组成,晶格常数为√2a、2a和√2a, Z=4。因此,除了萤石结构外,焦绿石和黄铁矿还具有相应的超晶格结构。据我们所知,激波压缩技术从未应用于复杂化学体系中的固-固反应。我们探索这样的化学系统使用激波压缩技术。爆炸冲击波和高应变率现象材料研究论坛LLC材料研究学报13 (2019)31-34 https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644900338-5 32实验方法我们对两种初始混合物Gd2Zr2O7 (Gd2O3 + 2 ZrO2的粉末状混合物与产品在900℃空气中加热2小时)进行冲击压缩,并将其封装在铜容器中,采用爆炸驱动飞片冲击方法[3]。一个直径为40mm,厚度为2mm的铜飞片,由8701炸药助推装药引发的硝基甲烷(CH3NO2)主爆药起爆,将其加速至高速[3]。根据已知的冲击速度,采用阻抗匹配法计算试样内反射的峰值冲击压力。用密度为8.924 g/cm的铜[4]的激波速度(Us km/s)和粒子速度(Up km/s)的关系式为Us = 3.91 + 1.51Up。根据粉末x射线衍射(XRD)分析(图1 a、B、C),在900℃下预热的起始材料(样品I)部分反应为具有单斜ZrO2的荧石结构。另一种起始材料(样品II)是Gd2O3和单斜ZrO2的混合物作为接收粉末。将注射后的容器切开,取出样品。用粉末x射线衍射法对成功回收的样品和起始原料进行了研究,以确定产品中存在的相。我们进行了一系列的恢复实验,作为冲击速度和孔隙率的函数。爆炸冲击波和高应变率现象材料研究论坛LLC材料研究学报第13期(2019)31-34 https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644900338-5 33结果和讨论我们已经开始了一系列的冲击恢复实验,对各种尚不知道的焦氯化合物,并探索新的化合物使用冲击压缩。我们报道并讨论了两种Gd2Zr2O7块体组成的结果。Cu飞片的冲击速度为1.85 km/s、2/36 km/s和3.06 km/s,峰值冲击压力分别为43.5 GPa、60.0 GPa和84.9 GPa。回收样品的XRD图谱表明,样品I完全转变为萤石结构,没有额外的峰(图1f)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信