‘The Thought of Death Changes all our Ideas and Condemns all our Plans’

M. Moriarty
{"title":"‘The Thought of Death Changes all our Ideas and Condemns all our Plans’","authors":"M. Moriarty","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192843616.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The chapter highlights the variety of specifically Christian philosophical approaches to the question of the soul’s immortality. Leonard Lessius and Jean de Silhon, working within a broadly Aristotelian framework, argue that the purposiveness universally apparent in nature would be frustrated if humans were mortal. Descartes eschews such appeals to the divine purpose, but his dualist metaphysics offers grounds for belief in the soul’s capacity to survive death. He and Elisabeth of Bohemia discuss how far belief in a happier life after death should affect our pursuit of earthly happiness. Pascal rejects philosophical proofs of immortality, while insisting that we must take an existential stance that admits it as a possibility. Malebranche seeks to highlight the unreality of earthly goods, but, by distinguishing the physical from the intelligible body, he investigates the possibility of post-mortem forms of experience (sensations and attachments) that are in some sense continuous with those of this life.","PeriodicalId":129974,"journal":{"name":"Life and Death in Early Modern Philosophy","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life and Death in Early Modern Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192843616.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The chapter highlights the variety of specifically Christian philosophical approaches to the question of the soul’s immortality. Leonard Lessius and Jean de Silhon, working within a broadly Aristotelian framework, argue that the purposiveness universally apparent in nature would be frustrated if humans were mortal. Descartes eschews such appeals to the divine purpose, but his dualist metaphysics offers grounds for belief in the soul’s capacity to survive death. He and Elisabeth of Bohemia discuss how far belief in a happier life after death should affect our pursuit of earthly happiness. Pascal rejects philosophical proofs of immortality, while insisting that we must take an existential stance that admits it as a possibility. Malebranche seeks to highlight the unreality of earthly goods, but, by distinguishing the physical from the intelligible body, he investigates the possibility of post-mortem forms of experience (sensations and attachments) that are in some sense continuous with those of this life.
“死亡的想法改变了我们所有的想法,谴责了我们所有的计划”
这一章强调了基督教哲学对灵魂不朽问题的各种具体方法。莱纳德·莱西乌斯和让·德·席隆在宽泛的亚里士多德框架下进行研究,他们认为,如果人类终有一死,自然界普遍存在的合意性将会受到挫折。笛卡尔回避了这种对神圣目的的呼吁,但他的二元论形而上学为相信灵魂在死亡中幸存的能力提供了依据。他和波西米亚的伊丽莎白讨论了对死后更幸福生活的信仰应该在多大程度上影响我们对世俗幸福的追求。帕斯卡拒绝不朽的哲学证明,同时坚持认为我们必须采取一种存在主义的立场,承认它是一种可能性。Malebranche试图突出世俗事物的非现实性,但是,通过将物质与可理解的身体区分开来,他研究了死后体验形式(感觉和依恋)的可能性,这些形式在某种意义上与今生的体验是连续的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信