Software Effort Estimation Using Early COSMIC to Substitute Use Case Weight

Renny Sari Dewi, R. Sarno
{"title":"Software Effort Estimation Using Early COSMIC to Substitute Use Case Weight","authors":"Renny Sari Dewi, R. Sarno","doi":"10.1109/iSemantic50169.2020.9234227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the size estimation software, there are many methods that have proven their reliability. One of them is Use Case Points (UCP). UCP has a well-known advantage based on the use case scenario which is a reformation of the user story in the software requirements specification (SRS) document. However, UCP also has several weaknesses, including the use case is a summary of the user story. User stories often do not reveal detailed data. Therefore, the potential ambiguity of the use case must be watched by a business/system analyst. On the other hand, there is an international association called COSMIC, which has developed a global standard for calculating the size of the software namely ISO/IEC 19761. The COSMIC model begins with a user story which is then carried out cascade to sequence diagrams to make an engagement between process/method flow and data. The purpose of this study is to substitute the use case weight of the pure UCP method, to become a COSMIC functional size unit (Cfsu). Then, the estimation results of the two are compared with the actual effort. The case study used as a comparison of the COSMIC and UCP methods is the Hair Salon Online Booking Application. From this study the results obtained are the deviation between the results of the original UCP estimate (keep use case weight) of the actual effort is 76.85 percent. As for software effort estimation using early COSMIC is 92.67 percent against the actual effort.","PeriodicalId":345558,"journal":{"name":"2020 International Seminar on Application for Technology of Information and Communication (iSemantic)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 International Seminar on Application for Technology of Information and Communication (iSemantic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/iSemantic50169.2020.9234227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In the size estimation software, there are many methods that have proven their reliability. One of them is Use Case Points (UCP). UCP has a well-known advantage based on the use case scenario which is a reformation of the user story in the software requirements specification (SRS) document. However, UCP also has several weaknesses, including the use case is a summary of the user story. User stories often do not reveal detailed data. Therefore, the potential ambiguity of the use case must be watched by a business/system analyst. On the other hand, there is an international association called COSMIC, which has developed a global standard for calculating the size of the software namely ISO/IEC 19761. The COSMIC model begins with a user story which is then carried out cascade to sequence diagrams to make an engagement between process/method flow and data. The purpose of this study is to substitute the use case weight of the pure UCP method, to become a COSMIC functional size unit (Cfsu). Then, the estimation results of the two are compared with the actual effort. The case study used as a comparison of the COSMIC and UCP methods is the Hair Salon Online Booking Application. From this study the results obtained are the deviation between the results of the original UCP estimate (keep use case weight) of the actual effort is 76.85 percent. As for software effort estimation using early COSMIC is 92.67 percent against the actual effort.
用早期COSMIC代替用例权重的软件工作量评估
在尺寸估计软件中,有许多方法已经证明了它们的可靠性。其中之一是用例点(UCP)。UCP有一个众所周知的基于用例场景的优势,它是对软件需求规范(SRS)文档中的用户描述的改造。然而,UCP也有一些弱点,包括用例是用户故事的总结。用户故事通常不会透露详细的数据。因此,业务/系统分析人员必须注意用例的潜在模糊性。另一方面,有一个名为COSMIC的国际协会,它制定了计算软件大小的全球标准,即ISO/IEC 19761。COSMIC模型从一个用户故事开始,然后将其级联到序列图,以在过程/方法流和数据之间建立联系。本研究的目的是替代纯UCP方法的用例权重,成为COSMIC功能大小单位(Cfsu)。然后,将两者的估计结果与实际工作量进行比较。作为COSMIC和UCP方法比较的案例研究是美发沙龙在线预订应用程序。从这个研究中获得的结果是实际工作的原始UCP估计(保持用例权重)的结果之间的偏差是76.85%。对于使用早期COSMIC的软件工作量估计,与实际工作量相比是92.67%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信