Economic Inequality and College Admissions Policies

D. Orentlicher
{"title":"Economic Inequality and College Admissions Policies","authors":"D. Orentlicher","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2642533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As economic inequality in the United States has reached unprecedented heights, reformers have focused considerable attention on changes in the law that would provide for greater equality in wealth among Americans. Much benefit would result from more equitable tax policies, fairer workplace regulation, and more generous spending policies.But there may be even more to gain by revising college admissions policies. Admissions policies at the Ivy League and other elite American colleges do much to exacerbate the problem of economic inequality. Accordingly, reforms of those policies may represent the most effective strategy for restoring a reasonable degree of economic equality in the United States.The need to address economic inequality should provide sufficient reason for selective universities to revise their admissions policies. But they also may not have any choice in the matter. The U.S. Supreme Court will be reconsidering its doctrine on affirmative action in its upcoming Term and may well conclude that college admissions offices -- public or private -- may no longer take an applicant’s race or ethnicity into account when making their admissions’ decisions.Fortunately, there is an important alternative to traditional admissions policies for elite universities to consider -- top class rank policies. Indeed, some public universities already have adopted top class rank policies in lieu of affirmative action to promote student body diversity. While the impact on student diversity is a key feature of top rank policies, this article focuses on another critical benefit of the policies -- their ability to turn elite universities from institutions that exacerbate economic inequality into institutions that foster economic equality.","PeriodicalId":141658,"journal":{"name":"Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2642533","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

As economic inequality in the United States has reached unprecedented heights, reformers have focused considerable attention on changes in the law that would provide for greater equality in wealth among Americans. Much benefit would result from more equitable tax policies, fairer workplace regulation, and more generous spending policies.But there may be even more to gain by revising college admissions policies. Admissions policies at the Ivy League and other elite American colleges do much to exacerbate the problem of economic inequality. Accordingly, reforms of those policies may represent the most effective strategy for restoring a reasonable degree of economic equality in the United States.The need to address economic inequality should provide sufficient reason for selective universities to revise their admissions policies. But they also may not have any choice in the matter. The U.S. Supreme Court will be reconsidering its doctrine on affirmative action in its upcoming Term and may well conclude that college admissions offices -- public or private -- may no longer take an applicant’s race or ethnicity into account when making their admissions’ decisions.Fortunately, there is an important alternative to traditional admissions policies for elite universities to consider -- top class rank policies. Indeed, some public universities already have adopted top class rank policies in lieu of affirmative action to promote student body diversity. While the impact on student diversity is a key feature of top rank policies, this article focuses on another critical benefit of the policies -- their ability to turn elite universities from institutions that exacerbate economic inequality into institutions that foster economic equality.
经济不平等与大学录取政策
随着美国的经济不平等达到前所未有的高度,改革者们把相当多的注意力集中在修改法律上,以使美国人之间的财富更加平等。更公平的税收政策、更公平的工作场所监管和更慷慨的支出政策将带来更多好处。但修改大学招生政策可能会带来更多好处。常春藤盟校和其他美国精英大学的招生政策在很大程度上加剧了经济不平等问题。因此,改革这些政策可能是在美国恢复合理程度的经济平等的最有效战略。解决经济不平等问题的必要性,应该成为重点大学修改招生政策的充分理由。但在这个问题上,他们可能也没有任何选择。美国最高法院将在下一届任期内重新考虑其关于平权法案的原则,并很可能得出结论,大学招生办公室——无论是公立的还是私立的——在做出录取决定时可能不再考虑申请人的种族或民族。幸运的是,对于精英大学来说,除了传统的招生政策之外,还有一个重要的选择——顶级排名政策。事实上,一些公立大学为了促进学生的多样性,已经采用了一流的排名政策,而不是平权法案。虽然对学生多样性的影响是顶级排名政策的一个关键特征,但本文关注的是这些政策的另一个关键好处——它们有能力将精英大学从加剧经济不平等的机构转变为促进经济平等的机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信