Free speech, politics, and government

R. Baecker
{"title":"Free speech, politics, and government","authors":"R. Baecker","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198827085.003.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Politics and government are undergoing dramatic changes through the advent of new technology. The early developers of community networks (mentioned in Section 1.2) had hopeful visions of information technology (IT)-facilitating participatory democracy. Yet the most memorable visions have been literary dystopias, where surveillance is omnipresent and governments have absolute control. We shall begin by highlighting some of these important writings. We shall then consider a current and present topic—the cultural and legal frameworks governing free speech and other forms of expression on the internet. We review several kinds of ‘undesirable’ speech that test our commitment to free speech—messages that are viewed as obscene, hateful, seditious, or encouraging of terrorism. Next, we examine methods governments worldwide use to censor web content and prevent digital transmission of messages of which they disapprove, as well as a similar role for social media firms in what is now known as content moderation. We shall also mention one new form of rampant and very harmful internet speech— fake news. Fake news becomes especially troubling when it is released into and retransmitted widely into filter bubbles that select these messages and echo chambers that focus and sensationalize such points of view to the exclusion of other contradictory ideas. The prevalence and dangers of fake news became obvious during post facto analyses of the 2016 US presidential campaign. The internet and social media enable greater civic participation, which is usually called e-democracy or civic tech. Most such uses of social media are relatively benign, as in online deliberations about the desired size of a bond issue, or internet lobbying to get libraries to stay open longer during the summer. However, for more significant issues, such as violations of fundamental human rights, or unpopular political decisions that incite public unrest, social media communications may facilitate political protest that can lead to political change. IT also plays a role in elections—social media can be used to mobilize the electorate and build enthusiasm for a candidate. Correspondingly, surveys and big data are used to target potential voters during political campaigns and to tailor specific messages to key voters.","PeriodicalId":111342,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Society","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198827085.003.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Politics and government are undergoing dramatic changes through the advent of new technology. The early developers of community networks (mentioned in Section 1.2) had hopeful visions of information technology (IT)-facilitating participatory democracy. Yet the most memorable visions have been literary dystopias, where surveillance is omnipresent and governments have absolute control. We shall begin by highlighting some of these important writings. We shall then consider a current and present topic—the cultural and legal frameworks governing free speech and other forms of expression on the internet. We review several kinds of ‘undesirable’ speech that test our commitment to free speech—messages that are viewed as obscene, hateful, seditious, or encouraging of terrorism. Next, we examine methods governments worldwide use to censor web content and prevent digital transmission of messages of which they disapprove, as well as a similar role for social media firms in what is now known as content moderation. We shall also mention one new form of rampant and very harmful internet speech— fake news. Fake news becomes especially troubling when it is released into and retransmitted widely into filter bubbles that select these messages and echo chambers that focus and sensationalize such points of view to the exclusion of other contradictory ideas. The prevalence and dangers of fake news became obvious during post facto analyses of the 2016 US presidential campaign. The internet and social media enable greater civic participation, which is usually called e-democracy or civic tech. Most such uses of social media are relatively benign, as in online deliberations about the desired size of a bond issue, or internet lobbying to get libraries to stay open longer during the summer. However, for more significant issues, such as violations of fundamental human rights, or unpopular political decisions that incite public unrest, social media communications may facilitate political protest that can lead to political change. IT also plays a role in elections—social media can be used to mobilize the electorate and build enthusiasm for a candidate. Correspondingly, surveys and big data are used to target potential voters during political campaigns and to tailor specific messages to key voters.
言论自由、政治自由和政府自由
由于新技术的出现,政治和政府正在发生巨大的变化。社区网络的早期开发者(在1.2节中提到)对信息技术(IT)抱有希望——促进参与性民主。然而,最令人难忘的景象是文学上的反乌托邦,在那里监视无处不在,政府拥有绝对控制权。我们将首先强调其中一些重要的著作。然后,我们将考虑当前和当前的主题——管理互联网上言论自由和其他形式表达的文化和法律框架。我们回顾了几种“不受欢迎的”言论,它们考验着我们对言论自由的承诺——被视为淫秽、仇恨、煽动性或鼓励恐怖主义的信息。接下来,我们研究了世界各国政府用来审查网络内容和防止他们不赞成的信息的数字传输的方法,以及社交媒体公司在现在被称为内容审核中的类似作用。我们还应该提到一种新的形式的猖獗和非常有害的网络言论-假新闻。当假新闻被释放并广泛传播到过滤气泡中,过滤气泡选择了这些信息和回音室,这些回音室聚焦并耸人听闻这些观点,而排除了其他矛盾的观点,假新闻就会变得特别令人不安。在对2016年美国总统竞选的事后分析中,假新闻的普遍性和危险性变得显而易见。互联网和社交媒体使更多的公民参与成为可能,这通常被称为电子民主或公民科技。社交媒体的大多数此类用途相对来说是良性的,比如在网上讨论债券发行的理想规模,或者在网上游说让图书馆在夏季延长开放时间。然而,对于更重大的问题,如侵犯基本人权或不受欢迎的政治决定引发公众动乱,社交媒体通信可能会促进政治抗议,从而导致政治变革。信息技术在选举中也发挥着作用——社交媒体可以用来动员选民,培养对候选人的热情。相应地,在政治竞选期间,调查和大数据被用来瞄准潜在选民,并为关键选民量身定制具体信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信