Shariah Fintech

Aam, Aisyah As-Salafiyah
{"title":"Shariah Fintech","authors":"Aam, Aisyah As-Salafiyah","doi":"10.58968/eii.v4i2.98","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research was conducted to review the perception of sharia fintech within the scope of the sharia economy from the perspective of sentiment research on Twitter social media users in response to the development of sharia fintech. The method used in this study is a qualitative approach with descriptive statistics from the literature study in the form of 2131 Twitter tweets. A Python library software called VADER (Valence Aware Dictionary and Sentiment Reasoner) is used to classify tweets. Sentiment analysis results tend to perceive neutral sentiment at 80.8%, positive sentiment at 16.2%, and negative sentiment at 3.0%. The diversity of sentiment results shows that there are pros and cons to the development of sharia fintech. The benefits of this research are literature and considerations related to the development of sharia fintech and efforts to identify weaknesses and threats in the form of negative perceptions of the implementation of sharia fintech. In addition, to find out positive perceptions, strengths, potential, and benefits of Islamic fintech. This research is the first comprehensive study to discuss sentiment analysis on sharia fintech themes with Twitter tweet data. Suggestions for further research and recommendations are listed.","PeriodicalId":243427,"journal":{"name":"Ekonomi Islam Indonesia","volume":"127 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ekonomi Islam Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58968/eii.v4i2.98","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research was conducted to review the perception of sharia fintech within the scope of the sharia economy from the perspective of sentiment research on Twitter social media users in response to the development of sharia fintech. The method used in this study is a qualitative approach with descriptive statistics from the literature study in the form of 2131 Twitter tweets. A Python library software called VADER (Valence Aware Dictionary and Sentiment Reasoner) is used to classify tweets. Sentiment analysis results tend to perceive neutral sentiment at 80.8%, positive sentiment at 16.2%, and negative sentiment at 3.0%. The diversity of sentiment results shows that there are pros and cons to the development of sharia fintech. The benefits of this research are literature and considerations related to the development of sharia fintech and efforts to identify weaknesses and threats in the form of negative perceptions of the implementation of sharia fintech. In addition, to find out positive perceptions, strengths, potential, and benefits of Islamic fintech. This research is the first comprehensive study to discuss sentiment analysis on sharia fintech themes with Twitter tweet data. Suggestions for further research and recommendations are listed.
教法Fintech
本研究旨在从Twitter社交媒体用户对伊斯兰金融科技发展的情绪研究的角度,回顾伊斯兰经济范围内对伊斯兰金融科技的看法。本研究使用的方法是定性方法,描述性统计来自2131条Twitter推文的文献研究。一个名为VADER (Valence Aware Dictionary and Sentiment Reasoner)的Python库软件被用来对推文进行分类。情绪分析结果倾向于中性情绪占80.8%,积极情绪占16.2%,消极情绪占3.0%。不同的情绪结果表明,伊斯兰金融科技的发展有利有弊。本研究的好处是与伊斯兰金融科技发展相关的文献和考虑因素,以及以对伊斯兰金融科技实施的负面看法的形式确定弱点和威胁的努力。此外,找出伊斯兰金融科技的积极看法、优势、潜力和好处。这项研究是第一个用Twitter推文数据讨论伊斯兰金融科技主题情绪分析的综合研究。提出了进一步研究的建议和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信