Enterococci Contamination on Edisto Island, South Carolina: Frequency, Sources of Contamination, and Prospects on How to Improve Water Quality

Christina Ek, D. Porter, D. Graves, Bryan Rabon, B. Cai, G. Cai, Ronald Willis, G. Scott
{"title":"Enterococci Contamination on Edisto Island, South Carolina: Frequency, Sources of Contamination, and Prospects on How to Improve Water Quality","authors":"Christina Ek, D. Porter, D. Graves, Bryan Rabon, B. Cai, G. Cai, Ronald Willis, G. Scott","doi":"10.34068/jscwr/08.01.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Beach monitoring samples were collected from 18 (14 currently in use) locations on Edisto Island, South Carolina, from 2000 to 2016 to assess patterns of water quality violations (contraventions) indicated by the presence of multiple Enterococcus species, including Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium, bacteria used to assess the health of surface waters for contact recreation. Statistical analyses were conducted comparing Enterococci levels and different environmental variables including location, tidal stages, wind direction, and time. Specific focus was placed on temporal and spatial patterns for dates when the bacteria levels exceeded 104 Most Probable Numbers (MPN) per 100 milliliters (ml), which is the Enterococcus single sample maximum (SSM) water quality standard in South Carolina. Results indicated that 2.2% of the samples exceeded the Enterococcus SSM standard and that the majority of these SSM contraventions occurred in September, during periods without significant rainfall but when primarily easterly winds occurred, at or near the time of flooding associated with King Tides (flood tides higher than 7.5 ft). Statistical analysis indicated that wind direction and tidal stage (at or around high tide—¾ flood to ¼ ebb) appeared to have more of an impact on bacterial levels than rainfall, per se. Microbial source tracking using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analysis was conducted and used to identify potential bacterial pollution sources causing Enterococci levels to exceed the SSM. Results indicated that birds and domestic dogs, rather than humans, were the major sources of bacterial pollution. These findings suggested that flooding during King Tides inundated a larger area of the beach-face surface containing bird and dog waste, which resulted in elevated levels of Enterococcus SSM contraventions, primarily on the southern end of the island. These findings are particularly relevant due to the increasing sea-level rise associated with climate change. Changes in population growth on Edisto Island were also analyzed and indicated that permanent population has been increasing at a relatively low rate, while high rates of tourism growth have been observed and may play a factor in observed increases in Enterococcus SSM contraventions. Comparisons of contact recreational water quality with other South Carolina (SC) beaches indicated that Edisto Island (2.2% of Enterococcus SSM contraventions) was third only behind the Grand Strand (10.9%) and Sullivan’s Island (3.9%), both of which have much higher population densities (777–1,300 people/sq. mile) compared to Edisto Island (36 people/sq. mile). These low population densities at Edisto Island and microbial source tracking results further indicate that most pollution sources were from birds and dogs and indicate the important role of coastal flooding associated with climate change. Coastal flooding is continuing to significantly increase as 24.4% of all King Tide flooding events in Charleston, South Carolina, over the past 67 years have occurred from 2019 to 2020. Better management of microbial pollution sources from dogs and birds is essential to prevent further degradation and loss of ecosystem services.","PeriodicalId":412787,"journal":{"name":"Journal of South Carolina Water Resources","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of South Carolina Water Resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34068/jscwr/08.01.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Beach monitoring samples were collected from 18 (14 currently in use) locations on Edisto Island, South Carolina, from 2000 to 2016 to assess patterns of water quality violations (contraventions) indicated by the presence of multiple Enterococcus species, including Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium, bacteria used to assess the health of surface waters for contact recreation. Statistical analyses were conducted comparing Enterococci levels and different environmental variables including location, tidal stages, wind direction, and time. Specific focus was placed on temporal and spatial patterns for dates when the bacteria levels exceeded 104 Most Probable Numbers (MPN) per 100 milliliters (ml), which is the Enterococcus single sample maximum (SSM) water quality standard in South Carolina. Results indicated that 2.2% of the samples exceeded the Enterococcus SSM standard and that the majority of these SSM contraventions occurred in September, during periods without significant rainfall but when primarily easterly winds occurred, at or near the time of flooding associated with King Tides (flood tides higher than 7.5 ft). Statistical analysis indicated that wind direction and tidal stage (at or around high tide—¾ flood to ¼ ebb) appeared to have more of an impact on bacterial levels than rainfall, per se. Microbial source tracking using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analysis was conducted and used to identify potential bacterial pollution sources causing Enterococci levels to exceed the SSM. Results indicated that birds and domestic dogs, rather than humans, were the major sources of bacterial pollution. These findings suggested that flooding during King Tides inundated a larger area of the beach-face surface containing bird and dog waste, which resulted in elevated levels of Enterococcus SSM contraventions, primarily on the southern end of the island. These findings are particularly relevant due to the increasing sea-level rise associated with climate change. Changes in population growth on Edisto Island were also analyzed and indicated that permanent population has been increasing at a relatively low rate, while high rates of tourism growth have been observed and may play a factor in observed increases in Enterococcus SSM contraventions. Comparisons of contact recreational water quality with other South Carolina (SC) beaches indicated that Edisto Island (2.2% of Enterococcus SSM contraventions) was third only behind the Grand Strand (10.9%) and Sullivan’s Island (3.9%), both of which have much higher population densities (777–1,300 people/sq. mile) compared to Edisto Island (36 people/sq. mile). These low population densities at Edisto Island and microbial source tracking results further indicate that most pollution sources were from birds and dogs and indicate the important role of coastal flooding associated with climate change. Coastal flooding is continuing to significantly increase as 24.4% of all King Tide flooding events in Charleston, South Carolina, over the past 67 years have occurred from 2019 to 2020. Better management of microbial pollution sources from dogs and birds is essential to prevent further degradation and loss of ecosystem services.
南卡罗莱纳埃迪斯托岛肠球菌污染:频率,污染源,以及如何改善水质的前景
从2000年至2016年,从南卡罗来纳州埃迪斯托岛的18个(目前正在使用的14个)地点收集了海滩监测样本,以评估多种肠球菌(包括粪肠球菌和粪肠球菌)的存在所表明的水质违规模式,这些细菌用于评估接触性娱乐地表水的健康状况。统计分析肠球菌水平与不同环境变量(地点、潮汐阶段、风向和时间)的差异。当细菌水平超过每100毫升(ml) 104个最可能数(MPN)时,特别关注的是时间和空间模式,这是南卡罗来纳州的单样本肠球菌最大(SSM)水质标准。结果显示,2.2%的样本超过了肠球菌的SSM标准,而这些SSM超标的大部分发生在九月份,在没有明显降雨但主要是东风的时候,在大潮(潮水高于7.5英尺)的洪水期间或附近。统计分析表明,风向和潮汐阶段(在涨潮时或前后- 3 / 4的洪水到1 / 4的退潮)似乎比降雨本身对细菌水平的影响更大。采用定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)方法进行微生物源追踪,并用于鉴定导致肠球菌水平超过SSM的潜在细菌污染源。结果表明,鸟类和家养狗是细菌污染的主要来源,而不是人类。这些研究结果表明,大潮期间的洪水淹没了含有鸟和狗粪便的更大面积的海滩表面,导致SSM肠球菌含量升高,主要是在岛的南端。由于海平面上升与气候变化有关,这些发现尤其重要。还分析了埃迪斯托岛人口增长的变化,表明常住人口以相对较低的速度增长,而观察到的旅游业增长率很高,这可能是观察到的SSM肠球菌违禁品增加的一个因素。与南卡罗来纳州(SC)其他海滩的接触休闲水质比较表明,埃迪斯托岛(2.2%的SSM肠球菌违规)仅次于大海滩(10.9%)和沙利文岛(3.9%),这两个岛的人口密度都要高得多(777 - 1300人/平方公里)。相比之下,埃迪斯托岛(36人/平方公里)。英里)。Edisto岛的低种群密度和微生物源跟踪结果进一步表明,大多数污染源来自鸟类和狗,并表明沿海洪水与气候变化相关的重要作用。在过去的67年里,南卡罗来纳州查尔斯顿发生的所有国王潮洪水事件中,有24.4%发生在2019年至2020年之间,沿海洪水继续显著增加。更好地管理来自狗和鸟类的微生物污染源,对于防止生态系统服务的进一步退化和丧失至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信