What's the Best Way to Stabilize Oil in the Permian? An Examination of Different Facilities Layouts

I. Chan, S. Baaren, Anthony Sarcletti
{"title":"What's the Best Way to Stabilize Oil in the Permian? An Examination of Different Facilities Layouts","authors":"I. Chan, S. Baaren, Anthony Sarcletti","doi":"10.2118/210446-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Operators in the unconventional shale oil space are becoming increasingly focused on methods to reduce emissions, mitigate issues due to NGL production, increase sales oil production, and increase safety. Moreover, for facilities to operate unmanned facility designs are required to be simple and robust.\n Each facility configuration optimizes for a different utility: some allow more flexibility for the economic investment, while others offer familiarity of operation. The option that adds the most flexibility per dollar invested focuses on low-pressure separation with simultaneous heat introduction with minimum necessary storage tanks.\n Three different facilities are compared utilizing hydrocarbon recovery, NGL production, gas production, compression power, and Reid Vapor Pressure as key metrics. The three layouts include: a heater treater, a vapor recovery tower, and a novel elevated heated separation design that combines the utility of a heater treater and vapor recovery tower.\n The novel low-pressure stabilization system allows for stabilized oil to be pumped either to storage tanks or directly to the custody transfer point. Emissions stemming from tank vapor and tank vapor management systems are avoided as the oil is stabilized before entering the storage tanks or being transported directly to custody transfer.\n The novel system can be scaled for higher production rates seen at central processing facilities where traditional equipment such as heater treaters would require operating several parallel production trains. The novel design avoids known operational safety and maintenance issues regarding direct fired heaters and tanks; thus, improving safety and operational cost.\n Existing facilities designs include equipment such as direct fired heater treaters, inline heat exchangers, vapor recovery towers and tanks. The results from all process simulations and operational data is summarized in an overview comparing the performance of the various facility designs.","PeriodicalId":113697,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, October 04, 2022","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, October 04, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/210446-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Operators in the unconventional shale oil space are becoming increasingly focused on methods to reduce emissions, mitigate issues due to NGL production, increase sales oil production, and increase safety. Moreover, for facilities to operate unmanned facility designs are required to be simple and robust. Each facility configuration optimizes for a different utility: some allow more flexibility for the economic investment, while others offer familiarity of operation. The option that adds the most flexibility per dollar invested focuses on low-pressure separation with simultaneous heat introduction with minimum necessary storage tanks. Three different facilities are compared utilizing hydrocarbon recovery, NGL production, gas production, compression power, and Reid Vapor Pressure as key metrics. The three layouts include: a heater treater, a vapor recovery tower, and a novel elevated heated separation design that combines the utility of a heater treater and vapor recovery tower. The novel low-pressure stabilization system allows for stabilized oil to be pumped either to storage tanks or directly to the custody transfer point. Emissions stemming from tank vapor and tank vapor management systems are avoided as the oil is stabilized before entering the storage tanks or being transported directly to custody transfer. The novel system can be scaled for higher production rates seen at central processing facilities where traditional equipment such as heater treaters would require operating several parallel production trains. The novel design avoids known operational safety and maintenance issues regarding direct fired heaters and tanks; thus, improving safety and operational cost. Existing facilities designs include equipment such as direct fired heater treaters, inline heat exchangers, vapor recovery towers and tanks. The results from all process simulations and operational data is summarized in an overview comparing the performance of the various facility designs.
稳定二叠纪盆地石油的最佳方法是什么?不同设施布局的考察
非常规页岩油领域的运营商越来越关注减少排放、缓解NGL生产带来的问题、增加销售石油产量和提高安全性的方法。此外,无人驾驶设施的设计要求简单而坚固。每个设施配置都针对不同的用途进行了优化:一些设施为经济投资提供了更大的灵活性,而另一些设施则提供了熟悉的操作。每投资一美元增加最大灵活性的选择侧重于低压分离,同时引入热量,所需的储罐最少。利用油气采收率、NGL产量、天然气产量、压缩功率和Reid蒸气压作为关键指标,对三种不同的设施进行了比较。这三种布局包括:加热器处理器、蒸汽回收塔和一种新型的高架加热分离设计,该设计结合了加热器处理器和蒸汽回收塔的功能。新型低压稳定系统允许将稳定的油泵入储罐或直接泵入保管转运点。由于油在进入储罐或直接运输到保管转移之前已经稳定,因此避免了油罐蒸汽和油罐蒸汽管理系统产生的排放。这种新型系统可以在中央处理设施中实现更高的生产率,而传统设备(如加热器)需要运行多个并行生产列车。新颖的设计避免了直接燃烧加热器和储罐的已知操作安全和维护问题;从而提高安全性和运营成本。现有的设施设计包括直燃式加热器、在线热交换器、蒸汽回收塔和储罐等设备。所有过程模拟和运行数据的结果总结在一个概述中,比较了各种设施设计的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信