The reality of practicing some Reflection tools among students of science teachers at Sultan Qaboos University

Sharifa Al-Rawahi, Sulaiman M. Al-Balushi, Ali Al Issa, A. Kazem
{"title":"The reality of practicing some Reflection tools among students of science teachers at Sultan Qaboos University","authors":"Sharifa Al-Rawahi, Sulaiman M. Al-Balushi, Ali Al Issa, A. Kazem","doi":"10.36772/arid.aijeps.2022.367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study aimed to reveal the extent of the use of reflective practices tools among undergraduate students from the science curriculum majors at the College of Education at Sultan Qaboos University. To achieve the objective of the study, the quantitative approach was used to answer the main question: What is the degree of use of reflective practice tools among undergraduate students from the science curriculum majors at the College of Education at Sultan Qaboos University? An electronic questionnaire prepared by the researcher was applied to determine the degree of practice (high - medium - weak - non-existent) for several reflection tools, namely: action research, portfolio, reflective reports, self-assessment of performance, listening thinking, peer observation, ideas record, and learning groups.\nThe study sample consisted of (58) undergraduate students from the science curriculum majors at the College of Education at Sultan Qaboos University, (48) of them were female, and (10) were male. The results of the study showed that the average total score of student-teacher responses about the degree of their practice of reflection tools was (1.79) with a standard deviation of (1.00) and a weak practice degree, and the averages of the degree of practicing most of the tools were at a weak degree except for three of them were at a medium degree.\nThe study recommended the necessity of including reflective practices in teacher preparation courses in various disciplines and employing these reflective practices within assessment methods in teacher preparation programs.","PeriodicalId":413704,"journal":{"name":"Arid International Journal of Educational and physcological sciences","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arid International Journal of Educational and physcological sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36772/arid.aijeps.2022.367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current study aimed to reveal the extent of the use of reflective practices tools among undergraduate students from the science curriculum majors at the College of Education at Sultan Qaboos University. To achieve the objective of the study, the quantitative approach was used to answer the main question: What is the degree of use of reflective practice tools among undergraduate students from the science curriculum majors at the College of Education at Sultan Qaboos University? An electronic questionnaire prepared by the researcher was applied to determine the degree of practice (high - medium - weak - non-existent) for several reflection tools, namely: action research, portfolio, reflective reports, self-assessment of performance, listening thinking, peer observation, ideas record, and learning groups. The study sample consisted of (58) undergraduate students from the science curriculum majors at the College of Education at Sultan Qaboos University, (48) of them were female, and (10) were male. The results of the study showed that the average total score of student-teacher responses about the degree of their practice of reflection tools was (1.79) with a standard deviation of (1.00) and a weak practice degree, and the averages of the degree of practicing most of the tools were at a weak degree except for three of them were at a medium degree. The study recommended the necessity of including reflective practices in teacher preparation courses in various disciplines and employing these reflective practices within assessment methods in teacher preparation programs.
在苏丹卡布斯大学科学教师的学生中练习一些反思工具的现实
本研究旨在揭示苏丹卡布斯大学教育学院理科专业本科生使用反思实践工具的程度。为了达到研究的目的,采用定量方法来回答主要问题:苏丹卡布斯大学教育学院理科课程专业的本科生使用反思性实践工具的程度如何?采用研究人员编制的电子问卷,对行动研究、作品集、反思报告、绩效自我评估、倾听思考、同伴观察、想法记录和学习小组等反思工具的实践程度(高-中-弱-不存在)进行了评估。本研究样本由苏丹卡布斯大学教育学院理科课程专业的58名本科生组成,其中48名为女生,10名为男生。研究结果表明,师生对反思工具实践程度的平均总分为(1.79),标准差为(1.00),实践程度较弱,除3个工具的实践程度为中等外,大多数工具的实践程度平均值为较弱。该研究建议在不同学科的教师培训课程中纳入反思实践的必要性,并在教师培训计划的评估方法中采用这些反思实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信