Comparative power-delay performance analysis of threshold logic technologies

Furkan Ercan, A. Muhtaroğlu
{"title":"Comparative power-delay performance analysis of threshold logic technologies","authors":"Furkan Ercan, A. Muhtaroğlu","doi":"10.1109/ICEAC.2015.7352166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent focus in energy efficiency is motivated with diminishing conventional energy resources, and increasing demand in low power applications with shrinking platform sizes. In this work, various threshold logic technologies are compared with each other in terms of power-delay-product (PDP). Compound CMOS, complementary pass transistor, static NAND gate, full adder, capacitive and differential threshold logic technologies are compared within a developed comparison scenario. Results in UMC180nm technology indicate that complementary pass transistor based threshold logic proves at least 2.5% more efficient than the rest in terms of PDP, while NAND based implementation has 29.2% better in terms of delay performance.","PeriodicalId":334594,"journal":{"name":"5th International Conference on Energy Aware Computing Systems & Applications","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"5th International Conference on Energy Aware Computing Systems & Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEAC.2015.7352166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent focus in energy efficiency is motivated with diminishing conventional energy resources, and increasing demand in low power applications with shrinking platform sizes. In this work, various threshold logic technologies are compared with each other in terms of power-delay-product (PDP). Compound CMOS, complementary pass transistor, static NAND gate, full adder, capacitive and differential threshold logic technologies are compared within a developed comparison scenario. Results in UMC180nm technology indicate that complementary pass transistor based threshold logic proves at least 2.5% more efficient than the rest in terms of PDP, while NAND based implementation has 29.2% better in terms of delay performance.
阈值逻辑技术的功率延迟性能比较分析
最近对能源效率的关注是由于传统能源资源的减少,以及平台尺寸缩小的低功耗应用需求的增加。在这项工作中,各种阈值逻辑技术在功率延迟积(PDP)方面相互比较。复合CMOS、互补通型晶体管、静态NAND门、全加法器、电容和差分阈值逻辑技术在一个开发的比较场景中进行了比较。UMC180nm技术的结果表明,基于互补通管的阈值逻辑在PDP方面的效率至少比其他逻辑高2.5%,而基于NAND的实现在延迟性能方面高出29.2%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信