Economies of Scale and Scope in Australian Superannuation Funds

H. Higgs, A. Worthington
{"title":"Economies of Scale and Scope in Australian Superannuation Funds","authors":"H. Higgs, A. Worthington","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1663272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper estimates economies of scale and scope for 200 large Australian superannuation (pension) funds in 2009 using a multiple-output cost function. This is the first and currently only year that certain fund-level information provided in the superannuation annual returns to the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has been deemed non-confidential and made publicly available. Costs are separately defined in terms of investment expenses— including investment, custodian and asset management fees—and operating expenses—comprising management, administration, actuarial, director and trustee fees and charges. Four outputs are specified for each cost: namely, cash flow adjusted net assets, the number of investment options, the proportion of total assets in the default strategy and the five-year rate of return for investment costs, and cash flow adjusted net assets, the number of members, net contribution flows and net rollovers for operating costs. The findings indicate that ray economies of scale hold up to at least 300 percent of current mean output in both investment and operating costs, though product-specific economies of scale hold primarily for assets under management and the number of investment options at relatively high levels of output for investment costs and for rollovers at low levels of output for operating costs. In contrast, there is little evidence that global and product-specific economies of scope prevail in the sector, and this is reflected in the proclivity of many superannuation funds to contract out many aspects of their investments and operations. JEL codes: C21 ⋅ D24 ⋅ G23","PeriodicalId":115401,"journal":{"name":"23rd Australasian Finance & Banking Conference 2010 (Archive)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"23rd Australasian Finance & Banking Conference 2010 (Archive)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1663272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper estimates economies of scale and scope for 200 large Australian superannuation (pension) funds in 2009 using a multiple-output cost function. This is the first and currently only year that certain fund-level information provided in the superannuation annual returns to the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has been deemed non-confidential and made publicly available. Costs are separately defined in terms of investment expenses— including investment, custodian and asset management fees—and operating expenses—comprising management, administration, actuarial, director and trustee fees and charges. Four outputs are specified for each cost: namely, cash flow adjusted net assets, the number of investment options, the proportion of total assets in the default strategy and the five-year rate of return for investment costs, and cash flow adjusted net assets, the number of members, net contribution flows and net rollovers for operating costs. The findings indicate that ray economies of scale hold up to at least 300 percent of current mean output in both investment and operating costs, though product-specific economies of scale hold primarily for assets under management and the number of investment options at relatively high levels of output for investment costs and for rollovers at low levels of output for operating costs. In contrast, there is little evidence that global and product-specific economies of scope prevail in the sector, and this is reflected in the proclivity of many superannuation funds to contract out many aspects of their investments and operations. JEL codes: C21 ⋅ D24 ⋅ G23
澳大利亚养老基金的规模经济和范围经济
本文采用多产出成本函数对2009年澳大利亚200家大型养老金基金的规模经济和范围经济进行了估算。这是第一次,也是目前唯一一次,向澳大利亚审慎监管局(APRA)提供的养老金年度回报中的某些基金级信息被视为非机密并公开提供。成本是根据投资费用(包括投资、托管人和资产管理费)和运营费用(包括管理、行政、精算、董事和受托人的费用和收费)分别定义的。每个成本指定了四个输出:即现金流调整后的净资产、投资选项数量、默认策略中总资产的比例和投资成本的五年回报率;现金流调整后的净资产、成员数量、净贡献流量和净滚转经营成本。研究结果表明,ray规模经济在投资和运营成本方面至少占当前平均产出的300%,尽管特定产品的规模经济主要适用于管理下的资产和投资选择数量,在相对较高的产出水平上投资成本,以及在较低的产出水平上滚动运营成本。相比之下,几乎没有证据表明全球和特定产品的范围经济在该行业盛行,这反映在许多养老基金倾向于将其投资和运营的许多方面外包出去。JEL代码:C21⋅D24⋅G23
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信