The Developing Carbon Financial Service Industry: Expertise, Adaptation and Complementarity in London and New York

Janelle Knox‐Hayes
{"title":"The Developing Carbon Financial Service Industry: Expertise, Adaptation and Complementarity in London and New York","authors":"Janelle Knox‐Hayes","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1124125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"London and New York are the world's pre-eminent financial centers. They are essential in processing the financial transactions of the global economy. The circumstances that have given rise to and maintained the preeminence of these centers are well explored in the literature. Less attention has been paid to the importance of these financial centers in organizing the complementary institutions, services, and products of functional and developing markets. This article looks at the role of London and New York, particularly the complementarity of exiting financial infrastructure, in developing a new carbon market. I argue that developing a market from existing financial infrastructure through complementarities is more efficient because it economizes on sunk costs, relies on the marginal pricing of new initiatives, and generally reduces the costs of infrastructure development. Therefore, new markets are best constructed using existing market infrastructure or by developing complementary processes within existent market systems. I investigate three levels of complementarity between (existent and new) markets and within the new carbon market: the complementarity of expertise and information, the complementarity of institutions and services, and the complementarity of market systems. Case studies constructed from expert interviews conducted with banks, brokerages, intermediaries, legal firms, consultancies, and wire services in London and New York are used to support the argument. This paper concludes by commenting on the significance of the financial service centers (geography) where the market is developed.","PeriodicalId":202121,"journal":{"name":"EIBFIN: Emissions Trading (Sub-Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"73","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EIBFIN: Emissions Trading (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1124125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 73

Abstract

London and New York are the world's pre-eminent financial centers. They are essential in processing the financial transactions of the global economy. The circumstances that have given rise to and maintained the preeminence of these centers are well explored in the literature. Less attention has been paid to the importance of these financial centers in organizing the complementary institutions, services, and products of functional and developing markets. This article looks at the role of London and New York, particularly the complementarity of exiting financial infrastructure, in developing a new carbon market. I argue that developing a market from existing financial infrastructure through complementarities is more efficient because it economizes on sunk costs, relies on the marginal pricing of new initiatives, and generally reduces the costs of infrastructure development. Therefore, new markets are best constructed using existing market infrastructure or by developing complementary processes within existent market systems. I investigate three levels of complementarity between (existent and new) markets and within the new carbon market: the complementarity of expertise and information, the complementarity of institutions and services, and the complementarity of market systems. Case studies constructed from expert interviews conducted with banks, brokerages, intermediaries, legal firms, consultancies, and wire services in London and New York are used to support the argument. This paper concludes by commenting on the significance of the financial service centers (geography) where the market is developed.
发展中的碳金融服务业:伦敦和纽约的专业知识、适应和互补性
伦敦和纽约是世界上最杰出的金融中心。它们在处理全球经济的金融交易中是必不可少的。文献中很好地探讨了产生并维持这些中心卓越地位的情况。很少有人注意到这些金融中心在组织功能性和发展中市场的互补机构、服务和产品方面的重要性。本文着眼于伦敦和纽约在发展新的碳市场中的作用,特别是现有金融基础设施的互补性。我认为,通过互补性从现有的金融基础设施中开发一个市场更有效,因为它节省了沉没成本,依赖于新举措的边际定价,并且通常降低了基础设施开发的成本。因此,新市场最好是利用现有的市场基础设施或在现有的市场体系内发展互补的过程来构建的。我研究了(现有市场和新市场)之间以及新碳市场内部三个层次的互补性:专业知识和信息的互补性,制度和服务的互补性,以及市场体系的互补性。案例研究是通过对伦敦和纽约的银行、经纪公司、中介机构、法律公司、咨询公司和电信服务机构进行的专家访谈构建而成的,用于支持这一论点。本文最后对金融服务中心(地理)在市场发展中的意义进行了评述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信