Political Influence on Language Education in Sri Lanka:Challenges and Opportunities

Sivalogasundarm Thiruchchenthuran
{"title":"Political Influence on Language Education in Sri Lanka:Challenges and Opportunities","authors":"Sivalogasundarm Thiruchchenthuran","doi":"10.33422/educationconf.2019.03.117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The English Language was introduced as the medium of instruction in 1833 in Sri Lanka, while Sinhala and Tamil remained indigenous languages. During the British Colonial rule in Sri Lanka, English language proficiency seemed to be instrumental to get government employment. Since Sri Lanka became an independent state, politicians have frequently intervened in the language policy of the country. The objective of this study is to categorize the challenges Sri Lankans encounter in language education and identify the opportunities to promote language education, particularly English as a second language proficiency. Both qualitative and quantitative methodologies were involved in the Research. Tools for data collection to implement this research included interviews, group discussions and secondary data sources. In 1960 s, as far as the government schools were concerned, the natives were keen to receive education in their own native languages. Yet, after a lapse of 18 years of the adoption of the system of bilingual education, the crisis such system underwent in its course is still recalled regrettably. It is disappointing to note that most of the students do not achieve the required level of English knowledge despite their school education for 13 years. Particularly students from rural areas, hill countries and poor families face serve difficulties in learning the language. It is suggested that politicians should consider for sighted amendments to the existing language policy for better prospect considering the higher educational prospects and career opportunities worldwide.","PeriodicalId":213104,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of The International Conference on Advanced Research in Education","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of The International Conference on Advanced Research in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33422/educationconf.2019.03.117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The English Language was introduced as the medium of instruction in 1833 in Sri Lanka, while Sinhala and Tamil remained indigenous languages. During the British Colonial rule in Sri Lanka, English language proficiency seemed to be instrumental to get government employment. Since Sri Lanka became an independent state, politicians have frequently intervened in the language policy of the country. The objective of this study is to categorize the challenges Sri Lankans encounter in language education and identify the opportunities to promote language education, particularly English as a second language proficiency. Both qualitative and quantitative methodologies were involved in the Research. Tools for data collection to implement this research included interviews, group discussions and secondary data sources. In 1960 s, as far as the government schools were concerned, the natives were keen to receive education in their own native languages. Yet, after a lapse of 18 years of the adoption of the system of bilingual education, the crisis such system underwent in its course is still recalled regrettably. It is disappointing to note that most of the students do not achieve the required level of English knowledge despite their school education for 13 years. Particularly students from rural areas, hill countries and poor families face serve difficulties in learning the language. It is suggested that politicians should consider for sighted amendments to the existing language policy for better prospect considering the higher educational prospects and career opportunities worldwide.
政治对斯里兰卡语言教育的影响:挑战与机遇
1833年,英语被引入斯里兰卡作为教学语言,而僧伽罗语和泰米尔语仍然是土著语言。在英国殖民统治斯里兰卡期间,英语能力似乎是获得政府就业的工具。自从斯里兰卡成为一个独立的国家以来,政治家们经常干预该国的语言政策。本研究的目的是对斯里兰卡人在语言教育中遇到的挑战进行分类,并确定促进语言教育的机会,特别是英语作为第二语言的能力。这项研究同时采用了定性和定量方法。实施本研究的数据收集工具包括访谈、小组讨论和二手数据源。在1960年代,就公立学校而言,当地人热衷于接受母语教育。然而,在实行双语教育18年之后,这一制度在其发展过程中所经历的危机仍令人遗憾地回忆起来。令人失望的是,尽管他们接受了13年的学校教育,但大多数学生的英语知识都没有达到要求的水平。特别是来自农村地区、山区和贫困家庭的学生在学习语言方面面临很大困难。考虑到世界范围内更高的教育前景和就业机会,建议政治家们应该考虑对现有的语言政策进行有远见的修改,以获得更好的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信