Selection and Optimization of Demulsifier Based on Physio-Chemical Characteristics of Emulsion

Ali R. Altowilib, R. Gajbhiye, M. Mahmoud, T. Sølling
{"title":"Selection and Optimization of Demulsifier Based on Physio-Chemical Characteristics of Emulsion","authors":"Ali R. Altowilib, R. Gajbhiye, M. Mahmoud, T. Sølling","doi":"10.2118/213617-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The presence of crude oil/water emulsions is a burden in the petroleum industry. It leads to several operational and economic issues related to crude production, transportation, and refining processes. The stability of the emulsified oil is affected by water content, presence of organic/inorganic materials, formation brine salinity, and temperature. In reservoir fluid studies, applying chemical demulsifiers on emulsion samples is common to break the emulsion and reduce the water content to an acceptable level (less than 1 wt. %) to generate representative fluid composition results. However, this process depends heavily on the crude and the water compositions and the type of demulsifier used. An incompatible choice of demulsifier could strengthen the emulsion's stability or alter the fluid composition. This introduces the need to understand specific physiochemical properties to identify the root causes of demulsifier ineffectiveness.\n In this study, two demulsifiers containing different functional groups (Type 1 and Type 2) were evaluated for their emulsion breakage ability. Nine oil samples from various fields were mixed with formation water in the first round and seawater in the second. The water-oil ratio of 80:20 was achieved using a blender for 1.5 minutes at 300 RPM. Saturates, Aromatics, Resins, and Asphaltene (SARA), viscosity, density, and sulfur content were determined for all oil samples. Furthermore, chemical analysis was conducted on all water samples to determine Total Dissolved Solids (TDS). After applying both demulsifiers at the same concentration (1% of total volume), separated water volumes were measured at 5, 10, 15, and 20 minutes and used to calculate the emulsion separation index (ESI). Results of this work showed that Type 1 demulsifier performed better than Type 2 in the formation water and seawater and while using different oils due to the resistance of the non-ionic surfactant to salinity, polarity, and water hardness. This study shows a methodology for effectively determining the optimum chemical demulsifier type to break emulsions by adequately understanding the chemistry of the oil, brine, resulting emulsions, and demulsifiers used.","PeriodicalId":249245,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Mon, February 20, 2023","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Mon, February 20, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/213617-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The presence of crude oil/water emulsions is a burden in the petroleum industry. It leads to several operational and economic issues related to crude production, transportation, and refining processes. The stability of the emulsified oil is affected by water content, presence of organic/inorganic materials, formation brine salinity, and temperature. In reservoir fluid studies, applying chemical demulsifiers on emulsion samples is common to break the emulsion and reduce the water content to an acceptable level (less than 1 wt. %) to generate representative fluid composition results. However, this process depends heavily on the crude and the water compositions and the type of demulsifier used. An incompatible choice of demulsifier could strengthen the emulsion's stability or alter the fluid composition. This introduces the need to understand specific physiochemical properties to identify the root causes of demulsifier ineffectiveness. In this study, two demulsifiers containing different functional groups (Type 1 and Type 2) were evaluated for their emulsion breakage ability. Nine oil samples from various fields were mixed with formation water in the first round and seawater in the second. The water-oil ratio of 80:20 was achieved using a blender for 1.5 minutes at 300 RPM. Saturates, Aromatics, Resins, and Asphaltene (SARA), viscosity, density, and sulfur content were determined for all oil samples. Furthermore, chemical analysis was conducted on all water samples to determine Total Dissolved Solids (TDS). After applying both demulsifiers at the same concentration (1% of total volume), separated water volumes were measured at 5, 10, 15, and 20 minutes and used to calculate the emulsion separation index (ESI). Results of this work showed that Type 1 demulsifier performed better than Type 2 in the formation water and seawater and while using different oils due to the resistance of the non-ionic surfactant to salinity, polarity, and water hardness. This study shows a methodology for effectively determining the optimum chemical demulsifier type to break emulsions by adequately understanding the chemistry of the oil, brine, resulting emulsions, and demulsifiers used.
基于乳化液理化特性的破乳剂选择与优化
原油/水乳状液的存在是石油工业的一个负担。它导致了与原油生产、运输和精炼过程有关的几个操作和经济问题。乳化油的稳定性受水含量、有机/无机物质的存在、地层盐水盐度和温度的影响。在储层流体研究中,通常使用化学破乳剂对乳化液样品进行破乳,并将水含量降低到可接受的水平(小于1wt . %),以产生具有代表性的流体成分结果。然而,这一过程在很大程度上取决于原油和水的组成以及所用破乳剂的类型。选择不相容的破乳剂可以增强乳液的稳定性或改变流体的组成。这就需要了解特定的物理化学性质,以确定破乳剂无效的根本原因。在本研究中,对两种含不同官能团的破乳剂(1型和2型)的破乳能力进行了评价。第一轮将来自不同油田的9个油样与地层水混合,第二轮将其与海水混合。水油比为80:20,使用搅拌器在300 RPM下搅拌1.5分钟。测定了所有油样的饱和烃、芳烃、树脂和沥青质(SARA)、粘度、密度和硫含量。此外,对所有水样进行化学分析,测定总溶解固形物(TDS)。两种破乳剂均以相同浓度(占总体积的1%)加入后,分别在5、10、15和20分钟测量分离水体积,并计算乳状液分离指数(ESI)。研究结果表明,由于非离子表面活性剂对矿化度、极性和水硬度的抵抗能力,1型破乳剂在地层水和海水中以及在不同的油中表现优于2型破乳剂。本研究展示了一种方法,通过充分了解油、盐水、生成的乳剂和所用的破乳剂的化学性质,有效地确定最佳的化学破乳剂类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信