International standards: practical or just theoretical?

ACM Stand. Pub Date : 1996-09-01 DOI:10.1145/240819.240820
Hugo Rehesaar
{"title":"International standards: practical or just theoretical?","authors":"Hugo Rehesaar","doi":"10.1145/240819.240820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"m Standards in most disciplines have developed over a very long period of time. The world of information technology (IT) is, however, relatively young. Nonetheless, numerous IT standards have already been developed under the auspices of ISO/IEC JTC1, its many subcommittees, and their 56 member nations. The rigor of the procedures for developing these standards ensures that standards published by JTC1 represent world opinion in their form, structure, and content. These procedures also ensure that the standards fulfill a specific need, and thus are practical. nternational standards play an important role in the maturation process of software development and in the furthering of software engineering as a formal discipline. While standards are an accepted part of mature disciplines, such as (physical) engineering and most of the trades, they are not yet well-established in the area of software development and engineering. Although the telecommunications industry leads the way in the development and universal acceptance of information technology standards, it too is still immature. The multitude of mobile and cellular phone standards within the United States serves as an example. In many countries, acceptance of standards, international or local, is not automatic; they are, in fact, not always welcome. Often, this is due to a lack of understanding of how standards are developed. Indeed, the process of developing international standards is understood by few. Many within the standards development arena see the process as being overly bureaucratic. Many outside the arena doubt the ability of a standard to represent the user community. Still others see standardization as one of those things that just happen—too complex to even try to understand. In order to gain wide acceptance of international standards, it is essential that potential users understand the development process, and thus gain some degree of confidence in the standards. This is equally true whether their adoption of the standard will be voluntary or mandatory. We detail the development of international (ISO/IEC) standards showing that international standards, by virtue of their very rigorous development processes and the international makeup of their development committees, do present practical solutions to the problems that beset the rather young and, in parts, immature discipline of software engineering. To illustrate this rigor, this article will describe the procedures adopted by the ISO/IEC Joint Technical Commmittee for Information Technology, JTC1. It will discuss the subcommittees of JTC1 and, in particular, the work groups within Subcommittee 7 (SC7)—Software Engineering. Our article is structured as follows: The structure of ISO and its subcommittees, International Standards: Practical or Just Theoretical? F E A T U R E A R T I C L E","PeriodicalId":270594,"journal":{"name":"ACM Stand.","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Stand.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/240819.240820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

m Standards in most disciplines have developed over a very long period of time. The world of information technology (IT) is, however, relatively young. Nonetheless, numerous IT standards have already been developed under the auspices of ISO/IEC JTC1, its many subcommittees, and their 56 member nations. The rigor of the procedures for developing these standards ensures that standards published by JTC1 represent world opinion in their form, structure, and content. These procedures also ensure that the standards fulfill a specific need, and thus are practical. nternational standards play an important role in the maturation process of software development and in the furthering of software engineering as a formal discipline. While standards are an accepted part of mature disciplines, such as (physical) engineering and most of the trades, they are not yet well-established in the area of software development and engineering. Although the telecommunications industry leads the way in the development and universal acceptance of information technology standards, it too is still immature. The multitude of mobile and cellular phone standards within the United States serves as an example. In many countries, acceptance of standards, international or local, is not automatic; they are, in fact, not always welcome. Often, this is due to a lack of understanding of how standards are developed. Indeed, the process of developing international standards is understood by few. Many within the standards development arena see the process as being overly bureaucratic. Many outside the arena doubt the ability of a standard to represent the user community. Still others see standardization as one of those things that just happen—too complex to even try to understand. In order to gain wide acceptance of international standards, it is essential that potential users understand the development process, and thus gain some degree of confidence in the standards. This is equally true whether their adoption of the standard will be voluntary or mandatory. We detail the development of international (ISO/IEC) standards showing that international standards, by virtue of their very rigorous development processes and the international makeup of their development committees, do present practical solutions to the problems that beset the rather young and, in parts, immature discipline of software engineering. To illustrate this rigor, this article will describe the procedures adopted by the ISO/IEC Joint Technical Commmittee for Information Technology, JTC1. It will discuss the subcommittees of JTC1 and, in particular, the work groups within Subcommittee 7 (SC7)—Software Engineering. Our article is structured as follows: The structure of ISO and its subcommittees, International Standards: Practical or Just Theoretical? F E A T U R E A R T I C L E
国际标准:实用还是理论?
m大多数学科的标准都是在很长一段时间内形成的。然而,信息技术(IT)的世界相对年轻。尽管如此,在ISO/IEC JTC1、它的许多小组委员会及其56个成员国的主持下,已经开发了许多IT标准。制定这些标准的严格程序确保了JTC1发布的标准在形式、结构和内容上代表了世界舆论。这些程序还确保标准满足特定的需求,因此是实用的。国际标准在软件开发的成熟过程和软件工程作为正式学科的进一步发展中扮演着重要的角色。虽然标准是成熟学科(例如(物理)工程和大多数行业)所接受的一部分,但它们在软件开发和工程领域尚未建立起来。虽然电信业在信息技术标准的制定和普遍接受方面处于领先地位,但它仍然不成熟。在美国有大量的移动电话和蜂窝电话标准就是一个例子。在许多国家,国际或地方标准的接受不是自动的;事实上,他们并不总是受欢迎的。通常,这是由于缺乏对如何制定标准的理解。事实上,很少有人了解制定国际标准的过程。标准开发领域的许多人认为这个过程过于官僚。该领域之外的许多人怀疑标准是否有能力代表用户群体。还有一些人认为标准化是刚刚发生的事情之一——太复杂了,甚至无法理解。为了获得国际标准的广泛接受,潜在用户必须了解开发过程,从而获得对标准的一定程度的信心。无论他们采用标准是自愿的还是强制性的,都是如此。我们详细介绍了国际(ISO/IEC)标准的发展,表明国际标准,凭借其非常严格的开发过程和其开发委员会的国际组成,确实为困扰相当年轻的问题提供了实际的解决方案,并且在某些方面,不成熟的软件工程学科。为了说明这种严谨性,本文将描述ISO/IEC信息技术联合技术委员会(JTC1)采用的程序。它将讨论JTC1的小组委员会,特别是第七小组委员会(SC7) -软件工程的工作组。我们的文章结构如下:ISO及其小组委员会的结构,国际标准:实践还是理论?如果我不喜欢你,我就不喜欢你
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信