Developments in MOOC Technologies and Participation Since 2012: Changes Since 'The Year of the MOOC'

Jeremy Riel
{"title":"Developments in MOOC Technologies and Participation Since 2012: Changes Since 'The Year of the MOOC'","authors":"Jeremy Riel","doi":"10.4018/978-1-5225-2255-3.CH686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Massive open online courses (MOOCs) are a recent approach to education, with much buzz generated around them by technology investors, educators, and the news media alike. However, despite the hype and the subsequent enrollment of millions of learners into MOOCs, the following years experienced a reversal of energy as the results of studies on the effects and costs of MOOCs began to reveal that MOOCs were not a panacea to formal educations’ challenges. Now, in 2016, as MOOCs continue to serve millions of students and there are more courses available than before, key questions persist about the efficacy, relevance, and value of MOOCs. This chapter examines the state of MOOCs between 2012 and 2016 and discusses advances in knowledge around MOOCs that have been observed from empirical research during this period. We build upon our previous review of MOOCs that was originally written in 2013 (Riel & Lawless, 2015), as a large number of studies focused on MOOC technologies, efficacy, and goals have been published in the short time between 2012 and 2016.","PeriodicalId":369795,"journal":{"name":"Writing Technologies eJournal","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Writing Technologies eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2255-3.CH686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Massive open online courses (MOOCs) are a recent approach to education, with much buzz generated around them by technology investors, educators, and the news media alike. However, despite the hype and the subsequent enrollment of millions of learners into MOOCs, the following years experienced a reversal of energy as the results of studies on the effects and costs of MOOCs began to reveal that MOOCs were not a panacea to formal educations’ challenges. Now, in 2016, as MOOCs continue to serve millions of students and there are more courses available than before, key questions persist about the efficacy, relevance, and value of MOOCs. This chapter examines the state of MOOCs between 2012 and 2016 and discusses advances in knowledge around MOOCs that have been observed from empirical research during this period. We build upon our previous review of MOOCs that was originally written in 2013 (Riel & Lawless, 2015), as a large number of studies focused on MOOC technologies, efficacy, and goals have been published in the short time between 2012 and 2016.
2012年以来MOOC技术和参与的发展:“MOOC年”以来的变化
大规模在线开放课程(MOOCs)是最近兴起的一种教育方式,技术投资者、教育工作者和新闻媒体都对其议论纷纷。然而,尽管大肆宣传,随后有数百万学习者加入了mooc,但随着对mooc效果和成本的研究结果开始显示,mooc并不是解决正规教育挑战的灵丹妙药,在接下来的几年里,mooc的能量出现了逆转。到了2016年,随着mooc继续为数百万学生提供服务,可供选择的课程也比以往更多,关于mooc的有效性、相关性和价值的关键问题仍然存在。本章考察了2012年至2016年间mooc的状况,并讨论了在此期间通过实证研究观察到的围绕mooc的知识进展。我们在2013年对MOOC的回顾(Riel & Lawless, 2015)的基础上,在2012年至2016年的短时间内发表了大量关于MOOC技术、功效和目标的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信