The influence of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) for teaching macroevolution on student outcomes in a general education biology course

Emily M. Walter
{"title":"The influence of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) for teaching macroevolution on student outcomes in a general education biology course","authors":"Emily M. Walter","doi":"10.32469/10355/37821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the influence of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) for teaching macroevolution on non-science majors’ knowledge of macroevolution and evolution acceptance. The nature and sources of an experienced faculty member’s PCK and instruction as enacted PCK (Park & Oliver, 2008) were examined to consider the influence of these components on students’ knowledge of macroevolution and evolution acceptance. The study used a mixed methods approach to understand how PCK influences student outcomes, and is one of the first to examine the influence of PCK on student outcomes at the post-secondary level. In addition, the study is one of few to document a significant relationship between knowledge of evolution and evolution acceptance, including how instruction influenced these outcomes. The instructor was found to have deep knowledge of learners, and this knowledge in turn informed the other components of her PCK. Her knowledge of learners was built through reflecting on student exam outcomes, referencing the pedagogical literature, interactions with students, and discussions with colleagues. These findings have implications for faculty professional development. The influence of the course was examined both quantitatively and qualitatively. Students were surveyed using the Measure of Understanding of Macroevolution (Nadelson & Southerland, 2010a) the Measure of Acceptance of the Theory of Evolution (Rutledge & Warden, 1999, 2007). From preto post-test, students became significantly more accepting of evolution (p < .0001) and made significant gains in understanding macroevolution (p < .0001). Knowledge of macroevolution and evolution acceptance were also significantly correlated (r[268]=.47, p<.01). Twelve students initially scoring low on both instruments also interviewed to examine how the instruction influenced their responses on the instruments. Nine of the students became more accepting of evolution, which they attributed to learning about the volume of evidence for evolution (especially transitional fossils) and learning about the history of life. These findings have important implications for evolution education policy and practice at the post-secondary level.","PeriodicalId":285769,"journal":{"name":"Submitted by the University of Missouri--Columbia Graduate School","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Submitted by the University of Missouri--Columbia Graduate School","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32469/10355/37821","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This study investigated the influence of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) for teaching macroevolution on non-science majors’ knowledge of macroevolution and evolution acceptance. The nature and sources of an experienced faculty member’s PCK and instruction as enacted PCK (Park & Oliver, 2008) were examined to consider the influence of these components on students’ knowledge of macroevolution and evolution acceptance. The study used a mixed methods approach to understand how PCK influences student outcomes, and is one of the first to examine the influence of PCK on student outcomes at the post-secondary level. In addition, the study is one of few to document a significant relationship between knowledge of evolution and evolution acceptance, including how instruction influenced these outcomes. The instructor was found to have deep knowledge of learners, and this knowledge in turn informed the other components of her PCK. Her knowledge of learners was built through reflecting on student exam outcomes, referencing the pedagogical literature, interactions with students, and discussions with colleagues. These findings have implications for faculty professional development. The influence of the course was examined both quantitatively and qualitatively. Students were surveyed using the Measure of Understanding of Macroevolution (Nadelson & Southerland, 2010a) the Measure of Acceptance of the Theory of Evolution (Rutledge & Warden, 1999, 2007). From preto post-test, students became significantly more accepting of evolution (p < .0001) and made significant gains in understanding macroevolution (p < .0001). Knowledge of macroevolution and evolution acceptance were also significantly correlated (r[268]=.47, p<.01). Twelve students initially scoring low on both instruments also interviewed to examine how the instruction influenced their responses on the instruments. Nine of the students became more accepting of evolution, which they attributed to learning about the volume of evidence for evolution (especially transitional fossils) and learning about the history of life. These findings have important implications for evolution education policy and practice at the post-secondary level.
宏观进化论教学内容知识(PCK)对通识教育生物学学生学习成果的影响
本研究考察了宏观进化论教学内容知识(PCK)对非理科生宏观进化论知识和进化论接受程度的影响。我们考察了经验丰富的教师的PCK的性质和来源,以及制定的PCK的指导(Park & Oliver, 2008),以考虑这些成分对学生宏观进化知识和进化接受度的影响。该研究使用混合方法来了解PCK如何影响学生成绩,并且是第一个研究PCK对中学后水平学生成绩影响的研究之一。此外,该研究是少数记录进化知识与进化接受之间重要关系的研究之一,包括教学如何影响这些结果。教师被发现对学习者有深入的了解,而这些知识反过来又通知了她的PCK的其他组成部分。她对学习者的了解是通过反思学生的考试结果、参考教学文献、与学生的互动以及与同事的讨论建立起来的。这些发现对教师的专业发展具有启示意义。从数量和质量两方面考察了该课程的影响。学生们使用宏观进化理解量表(Nadelson & Southerland, 2010a)和进化论接受量表(Rutledge & Warden, 1999,2007)进行了调查。从测试前到测试后,学生对进化论的接受程度显著提高(p < 0.0001),对宏观进化论的理解也显著提高(p < 0.0001)。宏观进化认知与进化接受度也显著相关(r[268]=)。47岁,p < . 01)。12名最初在两种乐器上得分较低的学生也接受了采访,以检查教学如何影响他们对乐器的反应。九名学生对进化论的接受度提高了,他们认为这是由于了解了大量的进化论证据(尤其是过渡型化石)和生命的历史。这些发现对高等教育的进化教育政策和实践具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信