Retention of various overdenture posts: An in vitro study

S. Kumar, Babita Karda, Kavipal Singh, Nimish Sethi
{"title":"Retention of various overdenture posts: An in vitro study","authors":"S. Kumar, Babita Karda, Kavipal Singh, Nimish Sethi","doi":"10.4103/2454-3160.177945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Tooth retained overdenture helps to reduce the impact of some of the complete denture wearing consequences: Residual ridge resorption, loss of occlusal stability, undermined esthetic appearance, and compromised masticatory function. Aims: This in vitro study compared the retention of three prefabricated overdenture posts cemented with self-adhesive resin cement. Subjects and Methods: Thirty freshly extracted noncarious, healthy mandibular canines were sectioned 1 mm above cementoenamel junction and endodontically treated. The teeth were divided in three groups and prepared for overdenture posts: Group 1: Access post overdenture (EDS, USA), Group 2: Flexi overdenture post (EDS, USA), and Group 3: Ceka Preci-Clix overdenture (Ceka Preci-line, Germany). Posts were cemented with self-adhesive resin cement (Relyx U 100, Germany). Each tooth was positioned identically in the universal testing machine (Instron), and the amount of force necessary to remove a post from the tooth was recorded. Statistical Analysis Used: The results obtained were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and the comparisons of groups were performed using post hoc Tukey honestly significant difference test. Results: Ceka Preci-Clix overdenture post has maximum mean retention value of 171.57N and access post overdenture has minimum retention value of 98.75N. Conclusions: Ceka Preci-Clix overdenture post was more retentive (171.57) due to its parallel sided design than the other posts used in this study. Flexi overdenture post, due to its split shank threaded design, was the 2 nd most retentive post (128.88) after Ceka Preci-Clix overdenture post and access post overdenture were least retentive post (98.75) due to its thick-walled hollow design.","PeriodicalId":220601,"journal":{"name":"The Saint′s International Dental Journal","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Saint′s International Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2454-3160.177945","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Tooth retained overdenture helps to reduce the impact of some of the complete denture wearing consequences: Residual ridge resorption, loss of occlusal stability, undermined esthetic appearance, and compromised masticatory function. Aims: This in vitro study compared the retention of three prefabricated overdenture posts cemented with self-adhesive resin cement. Subjects and Methods: Thirty freshly extracted noncarious, healthy mandibular canines were sectioned 1 mm above cementoenamel junction and endodontically treated. The teeth were divided in three groups and prepared for overdenture posts: Group 1: Access post overdenture (EDS, USA), Group 2: Flexi overdenture post (EDS, USA), and Group 3: Ceka Preci-Clix overdenture (Ceka Preci-line, Germany). Posts were cemented with self-adhesive resin cement (Relyx U 100, Germany). Each tooth was positioned identically in the universal testing machine (Instron), and the amount of force necessary to remove a post from the tooth was recorded. Statistical Analysis Used: The results obtained were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and the comparisons of groups were performed using post hoc Tukey honestly significant difference test. Results: Ceka Preci-Clix overdenture post has maximum mean retention value of 171.57N and access post overdenture has minimum retention value of 98.75N. Conclusions: Ceka Preci-Clix overdenture post was more retentive (171.57) due to its parallel sided design than the other posts used in this study. Flexi overdenture post, due to its split shank threaded design, was the 2 nd most retentive post (128.88) after Ceka Preci-Clix overdenture post and access post overdenture were least retentive post (98.75) due to its thick-walled hollow design.
不同覆盖义齿桩位固位的体外研究
背景:牙保留覆盖义齿有助于减少一些全口义齿佩戴后果的影响:残牙脊吸收、咬合稳定性丧失、美观受损和咀嚼功能受损。目的:比较三种预制覆盖义齿桩与自粘树脂水泥的固位效果。对象和方法:30只新鲜提取的健康下颌无龋犬在牙髓-牙釉质交界处上方1mm处进行牙髓治疗。将牙齿分为三组,分别用于覆盖义齿桩:组1:Access post覆盖义齿(美国EDS公司),组2:Flexi覆盖义齿桩(美国EDS公司),组3:Ceka Preci-Clix覆盖义齿(德国Ceka Preci-line公司)。用自粘树脂水泥(Relyx U 100,德国)对立柱进行胶结。每颗牙齿在万能试验机(Instron)中定位相同,并记录从牙齿上取下立柱所需的力。统计学分析方法:所得结果采用单因素方差分析进行统计学分析,组间比较采用事后Tukey诚实显著性差异检验。结果:Ceka Preci-Clix覆盖义齿桩的平均固位值最大为171.57N, access桩覆盖义齿的平均固位值最小为98.75N。结论:Ceka Preci-Clix覆盖义齿桩采用平行侧设计,固位率为171.57。Flexi覆盖义齿桩由于采用裂柄螺纹设计,其固位率为128.88,排在Ceka Preci-Clix覆盖义齿桩之后,access覆盖义齿桩由于采用厚壁空心设计,固位率为98.75,排在第二位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信