Hybrid go-betweens:

J. P. Crielaard
{"title":"Hybrid go-betweens:","authors":"J. P. Crielaard","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvckq4zg.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The point of departure for this paper is a number of tombs found in locations scattered over the central and eastern Mediterranean. Together they cover a period that encompasses the outgoing Bronze Age and the Iron Age. Although dispersed in time and space, these tombs have in common that each of them has features that are definitely of a non-local nature and is different or unusual in comparison to the graves that accompany them. The ambiguity of these tombs and the individuals buried in them has confused archaeologists, which is another element that these burials share. Scholars are divided over the question how to evaluate these individuals and, more in particular, what kind of ethnic identity they had. In this contribution I take a closer look at these tombs with two main aims in mind. First, I offer a different perspective on these ambiguous individuals. I treat them not in isolation but consider them as manifestations of a more widely occurring phenomenon. I argue that these individuals had hybrid or multiple identities, and compare them to other individuals attested in the archaeological and textual records who seem to have possessed comparable positions in intercultural or transcultural situations of increasing interconnectivity. In many recent studies on culture contact, the focus is on larger collectives, such as migrants or colonists. In this paper, however, I highlight the possible role of individuals in culture contacts and explore the phenomenon of cultural hybrids, which constitutes the second aim of my paper.","PeriodicalId":234017,"journal":{"name":"Change, Continuity, and Connectivity","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Change, Continuity, and Connectivity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvckq4zg.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The point of departure for this paper is a number of tombs found in locations scattered over the central and eastern Mediterranean. Together they cover a period that encompasses the outgoing Bronze Age and the Iron Age. Although dispersed in time and space, these tombs have in common that each of them has features that are definitely of a non-local nature and is different or unusual in comparison to the graves that accompany them. The ambiguity of these tombs and the individuals buried in them has confused archaeologists, which is another element that these burials share. Scholars are divided over the question how to evaluate these individuals and, more in particular, what kind of ethnic identity they had. In this contribution I take a closer look at these tombs with two main aims in mind. First, I offer a different perspective on these ambiguous individuals. I treat them not in isolation but consider them as manifestations of a more widely occurring phenomenon. I argue that these individuals had hybrid or multiple identities, and compare them to other individuals attested in the archaeological and textual records who seem to have possessed comparable positions in intercultural or transcultural situations of increasing interconnectivity. In many recent studies on culture contact, the focus is on larger collectives, such as migrants or colonists. In this paper, however, I highlight the possible role of individuals in culture contacts and explore the phenomenon of cultural hybrids, which constitutes the second aim of my paper.
混合中间人:
这篇论文的出发点是在地中海中部和东部分散发现的一些坟墓。它们合在一起,涵盖了即将结束的青铜时代和铁器时代。虽然这些坟墓在时间和空间上分散,但它们有一个共同点,那就是它们每一个都有明显的非本地性质的特征,与它们周围的坟墓相比是不同的或不寻常的。这些坟墓和埋葬在其中的人的模糊性让考古学家感到困惑,这是这些墓葬的另一个共同点。学者们在如何评价这些人的问题上存在分歧,尤其是他们有什么样的种族身份。在这篇文章中,我带着两个主要目的仔细研究了这些坟墓。首先,我对这些模棱两可的个体提供了一个不同的视角。我不是孤立地对待它们,而是把它们视为一种更广泛发生的现象的表现。我认为这些人具有混合或多重身份,并将他们与考古和文本记录中证明的其他个人进行比较,这些人似乎在日益相互联系的跨文化或跨文化情况下拥有类似的地位。在最近许多关于文化接触的研究中,重点是更大的集体,如移民或殖民者。然而,在本文中,我强调了个人在文化接触中的可能作用,并探讨了文化混合现象,这构成了我的论文的第二个目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信